Literature DB >> 28331727

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Vacuum Assisted and Core Needle Biopsies.

Fahrettin Kılıç1, Abdulkadir Eren2, Necmettin Tunç3, Mehmet Velidedeoğlu4, Selim Bakan1, Fatih Aydoğan4, Varol Çelik4, Ertuğrul Gazioğlu4, Mehmet Halit Yılmaz1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study to present the results of Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided cutting needle biopsy procedures of suspicious breast lesions that can be solely detected on Magnetic resonance (MR) examination.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 48 patients with 48 lesions which were solely be observed in breast MRI, indistinguishable in ultrasonography and mammography, for MR guided vacuum-assisted cutting needle biopsy and 42 patients with 42 lesions for MR guided cutting needle biopsy for the lesions of the same nature. MR imaging was performed using a 1.5-Tesla MRI device. Acquired MR images were determined and biopsy protocol was performed using computer-aided diagnosis system on the workstation. Vacuum biopsies were performed using 10 G or 12 G automatic biopsy systems, cutting needle biopsy procedures were performed using fully automated 12 G biopsy needle.
RESULTS: All biopsy procedures were finalized successfully without major complications. The lesions were 54 mass (60%), 28 were non-mass contrast enhancement (31%) and 8 were foci (9%) in the MR examination. Histopathological evaluation revealed 18 malignant (invasive, in-situ ductal carcinoma and lobular carcinoma), 66 benign (apocrine metaplasia, fibrosis, fibroadenomatoid lesion, sclerosing adenosis, fibrocystic disease and mild-to-severe epithelial proliferation) and 6 high-risk (atypical ductal hyperplasia, intraductal papilloma, radial scar) lesions.
CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance guided vacuum and cutting needle biopsy methods are successful methods fort he evaluation of solely MRI detected suspicious breast lesions. There are several advantages relative to each other in both methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance imaging; breast neoplasm; image-guided biopsy; large core needle; vacuum

Year:  2016        PMID: 28331727      PMCID: PMC5351431          DOI: 10.5152/tjbh.2015.2769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breast Health        ISSN: 1306-0945


  27 in total

1.  Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000.

Authors:  D M Parkin; F Bray; J Ferlay; P Pisani
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy.

Authors:  Laura Liberman
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience.

Authors:  Susan G Orel; Mark Rosen; Carolyn Mies; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Preoperative MR imaging-guided needle localization of breast lesions.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Morris; Laura Liberman; D David Dershaw; Jennifer B Kaplan; Linda R LaTrenta; Andrea F Abramson; Douglas J Ballon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Magnetic resonance-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results in 100 Japanese women.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Norie Yamashiro; Masaaki Sakamoto; Naomi Sakamoto; Nobuo Mizuuchi; Eisuke Fukuma
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Fast MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experience.

Authors:  Laura Liberman; Elizabeth A Morris; D David Dershaw; Cynthia M Thornton; Kimberly J Van Zee; Lee K Tan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted biopsy methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast.

Authors:  Liane E Philpotts; Regina J Hooley; Carol H Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Liberman; Elizabeth A Morris; Cathleen M Kim; Jennifer B Kaplan; Andrea F Abramson; Jennifer H Menell; Kimberly J Van Zee; D David Dershaw
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Christopher C Riedl; Lothar Ponhold; Daniel Flöry; Michael Weber; Regina Kroiss; Teresa Wagner; Michael Fuchsjäger; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures.

Authors:  Matthew Wallis; Anne Tardivon; Anne Tarvidon; Thomas Helbich; Ingrid Schreer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.034

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.