Literature DB >> 28331704

Rethinking: Ideal Screening Age for Breast Cancer in Developing Countries.

Maha Abdel Hadi1, Hefzi Al Ratrout1, Hamid Al Wadaani1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim is to identify the ideal screening age for women in developing countries and to determine the suitable method for early detection of breast cancer based on age and readiness of the community.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 30-year retrospective review (from 1984 to 2014) was undertaken at King Fahd Hospital of the University, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia. Medical records of those diagnosed with breast cancer from the outpatient department and hospital admission records were reviewed, focusing mainly on demographic data, age, and time at presentation. Radiological and histopathological records were also reviewed for confirmation of diagnosis. Age-based statistical review was undertaken of the female population within the hospital catchment area.
RESULTS: The total number of patients was 1.832, accounting for 0.8 % affected patients when plotted against the 235,339 females within the catchment area. Considering the standard screening age of 40 years, patients were divided into two groups: group I included those below the age of 40 years at the time of diagnosis, accounting for 641patients (35%), and group II included those above the age of 40 years, accounting for 1191 patients (65%). Group I patients were mostly reassured in primary healthcare centers, diagnostic modalities were used with reservation, relying solely on ultrasonography 276 (43%); whereas in group II patients, mammography was used liberally, which aided in the diagnosis in all 1191 (100%).
CONCLUSION: Despite the undisputable notion that breast cancer has higher predilection for women above the age of 40 years, there is a substantial subset of affected younger women in developing countries, which contradicts this concept. However, the scarcity of structured sessions in developing countries dictates Western-based early detection strategies, but the validity of such programs is culture-governed. Rigorously tailored screening programs directed towards individual communities are mandatory. Reducing the screening age by a decade in developing countries may increase the capture of early breast cancer and improve the outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; awareness; screening

Year:  2015        PMID: 28331704      PMCID: PMC5351448          DOI: 10.5152/tjbh.2015.2560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breast Health        ISSN: 1306-0945


  21 in total

1.  Quantifying the potential problem of overdiagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  M-F Yen; L Tabár; B Vitak; R A Smith; H-H Chen; S W Duffy
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Breast cancer in limited-resource countries: an overview of the Breast Health Global Initiative 2005 guidelines.

Authors:  Benjamin O Anderson; Roman Shyyan; Alexandru Eniu; Robert A Smith; Cheng-Har Yip; Nuran Senel Bese; Louis W C Chow; Shahla Masood; Scott D Ramsey; Robert W Carlson
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Social predictors of non-attendance in an urban mammographic screening programme: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Sophia Zackrisson; Martin Lindström; Mahnaz Moghaddassi; Ingvar Andersson; Lars Janzon
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Probabilistic cost-effectiveness modeling of different breast cancer screening policies in Slovenia.

Authors:  Klemen Rojnik; Klemen Naversnik; Tatjana Mateović-Rojnik; Maja Primiczakelj
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  Breast cancer among Yemeni women using the National Oncology Centre Registry 2004-2010.

Authors:  S El-Zaemey; N Nagi; L Fritschi; J Heyworth
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Early detection of breast cancer in countries with limited resources.

Authors:  Benjamin O Anderson; Susan Braun; Susan Lim; Robert A Smith; Stephen Taplin; David B Thomas
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 7.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Risk for distant recurrence of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods.

Authors:  Heikki Joensuu; Tiina Lehtimäki; Kaija Holli; Liisa Elomaa; Taina Turpeenniemi-Hujanen; Vesa Kataja; Ahti Anttila; Mikael Lundin; Jorma Isola; Johan Lundin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laura Esserman; Yiwey Shieh; Ian Thompson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.