Literature DB >> 18380626

Probabilistic cost-effectiveness modeling of different breast cancer screening policies in Slovenia.

Klemen Rojnik1, Klemen Naversnik, Tatjana Mateović-Rojnik, Maja Primiczakelj.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the most cost-effective screening policy for population-based mammography breast cancer screening in Slovenia using probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
METHODS: A time-dependent Markov model for breast cancer was constructed. General principles of cost-effectiveness analysis with multiple strategies were used to compare the costs and effects of 36 different screening policies. Using probability distributions for model parameters, the true effect of uncertainty across model input parameters on expected costs and effects was explored. The results from probabilistic simulation analysis are presented in a form of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves with cost-effectiveness acceptability frontier.
RESULTS: With the presented analysis, it was shown that a 1-year screening interval in population breast cancer screening would produce less benefits at higher costs than less intensive screening and that a 2-year interval would be cost-effective only at high values of society's willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Therefore, the optimal screening policy should be chosen among 3-year-interval policies.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on commonly quoted thresholds of society's willingness to pay per QALY of $50,000, the optimal approach in the Slovenian population would be screening women aged from 40 to 80 years every 3 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18380626     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00223.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  8 in total

1.  Output correlations in probabilistic models with multiple alternatives.

Authors:  Klemen Naveršnik
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-01-04

2.  Rethinking: Ideal Screening Age for Breast Cancer in Developing Countries.

Authors:  Maha Abdel Hadi; Hefzi Al Ratrout; Hamid Al Wadaani
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2015-07-01

3.  Finding the optimal mammography screening strategy: A cost-effectiveness analysis of 920 modelled strategies.

Authors:  Lindy M Kregting; Valérie D V Sankatsing; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Harry J de Koning; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 7.316

4.  Methods for Communicating the Impact of Parameter Uncertainty in a Multiple-Strategies Cost-Effectiveness Comparison.

Authors:  Henri B Wolff; Venetia Qendri; Natalia Kunst; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Veerle M H Coupé
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.749

5.  Cost effectiveness of breast cancer screening using mammography; a systematic review.

Authors:  Arash Rashidian; Eshagh Barfar; Hamed Hosseini; Shirin Nosratnejad; Esmat Barooti
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 1.429

6.  Is Age-targeted full-field digital mammography screening cost-effective in emerging countries? A micro simulation model.

Authors:  Fabiano Hahn Souza; Carísi Anne Polanczyk
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-07-31

7.  Cost-effectiveness of health-related lifestyle advice delivered by peer or lay advisors: synthesis of evidence from a systematic review.

Authors:  Mark Pennington; Shelina Visram; Cam Donaldson; Martin White; Monique Lhussier; Katherine Deane; Natalie Forster; Susan M Carr
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2013-12-04

8.  Evaluation of health benefits and harms of the breast cancer screening programme in the Basque Country using discrete event simulation.

Authors:  Arantzazu Arrospide; Montserrat Rue; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Merce Comas; Nerea Larrañaga; Garbiñe Sarriugarte; Javier Mar
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.