Literature DB >> 16430397

Breast cancer in limited-resource countries: an overview of the Breast Health Global Initiative 2005 guidelines.

Benjamin O Anderson1, Roman Shyyan, Alexandru Eniu, Robert A Smith, Cheng-Har Yip, Nuran Senel Bese, Louis W C Chow, Shahla Masood, Scott D Ramsey, Robert W Carlson.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death among women worldwide, with case fatality rates highest in low-resource countries. Despite significant scientific advances in its management, most of the world faces resource constraints that limit the capacity to improve early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of the disease. The Breast Health Global Initiative (BHGI) strives to develop evidence-based, economically feasible, and culturally appropriate guidelines that can be used in nations with limited health care resources to improve breast cancer outcomes. Using an evidence-based consensus panel process, four BHGI expert panels addressed the areas of early detection and access to care, diagnosis and pathology, treatment and resource allocation, and health care systems and public policy as they relate to breast health care in limited-resource settings. To update and expand on the BHGI Guidelines published in 2003, the 2005 BHGI panels outlined a stepwise, systematic approach to health care improvement using a tiered system of resource allotment into four levels-basic, limited, enhanced, and maximal-based on the contribution of each resource toward improving clinical outcomes. Early breast cancer detection improves outcome in a cost-effective fashion assuming treatment is available, but requires public education to foster active patient participation in diagnosis and treatment. Clinical breast examination combined with diagnostic breast imaging (ultrasound +/- diagnostic mammography) can facilitate cost-effective tissue sampling techniques for cytologic or histologic diagnosis. Breast-conserving treatment with partial mastectomy and radiation therapy requires more health care resources and infrastructure than mastectomy, but can be provided in a thoughtfully designed limited-resource setting. The availability and administration of systemic therapies are critical to improving breast cancer survival. Estrogen receptor testing allows patient selection for hormonal treatments (tamoxifen, oophorectomy). Chemotherapy, which requires some allocation of resources and infrastructure, is needed to treat node-positive, locally advanced breast cancers, which represent the most common clinical presentation of disease in low-resource countries. When chemotherapy is not available, patients with locally advanced, hormone receptor-negative cancers can only receive palliative therapy. Future research is needed to better determine how these guidelines can best be implemented in limited-resource settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16430397     DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00199.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  94 in total

Review 1.  Improving outcomes in breast cancer for low and middle income countries.

Authors:  C H Yip; I Buccimazza; M Hartman; S V S Deo; P S Y Cheung
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Cost-effectiveness of clinical breast assessment-based screening in rural Egypt.

Authors:  Adel Denewer; Osama Hussein; Omar Farouk; Waleed Elnahas; Ashraf Khater; Aiman El-Saed
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Breast Cancer in Low and Middle Income Countries: How Can Guidelines Best Be Disseminated and Implemented?

Authors:  Benjamin O Anderson; Vivien D Tsu
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Sociocultural factors and breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: implications for diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Dinah A Tetteh; Sandra L Faulkner
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-12

5.  Fear of Mastectomy Associated with Delayed Breast Cancer Presentation Among Ghanaian Women.

Authors:  Yehoda M Martei; Verna Vanderpuye; Beth A Jones
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-06-29

Review 6.  Questions About Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening Knowledge, Practice, and Outcomes: A Review of Demographic and Health Surveys.

Authors:  Laura Viens; Doug Perin; Virginia Senkomago; Antonio Neri; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of patients with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Brett Burnham; Sherrie Wallington; Irene A Jillson; Holta Trandafili; Kirti Shetty; Judy Wang; Christopher A Loffredo
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2014-09

8.  A brief intervention designed to increase breast cancer self-screening.

Authors:  Nangel M Lindberg; Victor J Stevens; K Sabina Smith; Russell E Glasgow; Deborah J Toobert
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2009 May-Jun

Review 9.  Breast cancer issues in developing countries: an overview of the Breast Health Global Initiative.

Authors:  Benjamin O Anderson; Raimund Jakesz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  An evaluation of the Train the Trainer International Breast Health and Breast Cancer Education: lessons learned.

Authors:  Karen Dow Meneses; Connie Henke Yarbro
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.