| Literature DB >> 28331602 |
Akhtar Rasool Asif1, Muhammad Awais2, Sumayyah Qadri3, Hafiz Ishfaq Ahmad4, Xiaoyong Du5.
Abstract
The identification of the candidate genes that play key role in phenotypic variation in livestock populations can provide new information about evolution and positive selection. IL-33 (71954) (Interleukin) gene is associated with the increased nematode resistance in small ruminants; however, the role of IL-33 for the genetic control of different diseases in Chinese goat breeds is poorly described in scientific literature. Therefore, the current investigation was performed for the better understanding of the molecular evolution and the positive selection of single-nucleotide polymorphism in IL-33 gene. Fixation Index (FST)-based method was used for the outlier loci determination and found that IL-33 was present in outlier area with the provisional combined allocation of mean heterozygosity and FST. Positively selected IL-33 gene was significantly, that is, p(Simul FST < sample FST = 0.98*) present in corresponding positive selection area. Hence, our study provided novel information about the nucleotide variations in IL-33 gene and found to be nonsynonymous which may helpful for the genetic control of diseases by enhancing the immune system in local Chinese goat breeds as well as in other analyzed vertebrate species.Entities:
Keywords: IL‐33; evolution; goat; positive selection
Year: 2017 PMID: 28331602 PMCID: PMC5355198 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2813
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Candidate gene IL‐33 under positive selection keeping the 95% confidence interval. F ST (Fixation index), H e (Heterozygosity)
Locus, heterozygosity (H e), and Fixation Index (F ST) for each of 21 genotyped SNPs
| Locus | Het |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| IL‐3 | 0.28 | −0 | 0.44 |
| DRB‐1 | 0.25 | 0.03 | 0.87 |
| DRB‐1 | 0.4 | 0.01 | 0.6 |
| GDF‐9 | 0.4 | −0.01 | 0.26 |
| IFNG | 0.54 | 0.03 | 0.95 |
| IGF‐1 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.69 |
| IGF‐1 | 0.45 | −0.01 | 0.1 |
| IL1‐α | 0.51 | −0.01 | 0.31 |
| IL1‐α | 0.38 | −0.01 | 0.34 |
| IL1‐β | 0.49 | −0.01 | 0.21 |
| IL1‐β | 0.5 | −0 | 0.4 |
| IL1‐β | 0.41 | 0 | 0.49 |
| IL‐8 | 0.51 | 0.04 | 0.91 |
| IL‐8 | 0.54 | 0.01 | 0.72 |
| IL‐31 | 0.5 | −0.01 | 0.11 |
| IL‐33(63854) | 0.49 | −0.01 | 0.36 |
| IL‐33(70589) | 0.1 | 0.04 | 0.95 |
| IL‐33(71954) | 0.38 | 0.05 | 0.98 |
| IL‐32 | 0.37 | 0.05 | 0.96 |
| IL‐32 | 0.45 | −0.01 | 0.18 |
| IL‐32 | 0.44 | 0.01 | 0.6 |
Heterozygosity (H e) and Fixation Index (F ST) p(Simulated F ST < sample F ST).
*indicate significance level.
Different models for positive selection tests for IL‐33 gene
| Model | Parameters | BIC | AICc |
| (+I) | (+G) | R |
|
|
|
| r(AT) | r(AC) | r(AG) | r(TA) | r(TC) | r(TG) | r(CA) | r(CT) | r(CG) | r(GA) | r(GT) | r(GC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T92 + G | 24 | 4252.78 | 4101.83 | −2026.76 | n/a | 1.27 | 1.6 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| T92 + I | 24 | 4253.94 | 4102.993 | −2027.35 | 0.27 | n/a | 1.55 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| K2 + G | 23 | 4254.4 | 4109.725 | −2031.72 | n/a | 1.21 | 1.6 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| K2 + I | 23 | 4255.36 | 4110.685 | −2032.2 | 0.28 | n/a | 1.56 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| T92 + G+I | 25 | 4260.16 | 4102.933 | −2026.3 | 0.18 | 3.13 | 1.58 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| K2 + G+I | 24 | 4261.62 | 4110.67 | −2031.19 | 0.19 | 3.21 | 1.59 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| HKY+G | 26 | 4269.73 | 4106.229 | −2026.94 | n/a | 1.25 | 1.61 | 0.308 | 0.272 | 0.214 | 0.206 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| TN93 + G | 27 | 4270.59 | 4100.808 | −2023.22 | n/a | 1.26 | 1.62 | 0.308 | 0.272 | 0.214 | 0.206 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| HKY+I | 26 | 4271.03 | 4107.528 | −2027.59 | 0.27 | n/a | 1.56 | 0.308 | 0.272 | 0.214 | 0.206 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| TN93 + I | 27 | 4272.92 | 4103.146 | −2024.38 | 0.26 | n/a | 1.56 | 0.308 | 0.272 | 0.214 | 0.206 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.2 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| HKY+G+I | 27 | 4277.15 | 4107.374 | −2026.5 | 0.18 | 3.04 | 1.59 | 0.308 | 0.272 | 0.214 | 0.206 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| TN93 + G+I | 28 | 4278.23 | 4102.177 | −2022.89 | 0.15 | 2.51 | 1.61 | 0.308 | 0.272 | 0.214 | 0.206 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| T92 | 23 | 4282.43 | 4137.759 | −2045.74 | n/a | n/a | 1.48 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| K2 | 22 | 4286.94 | 4148.549 | −2052.15 | n/a | n/a | 1.48 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| GTR+G | 30 | 4289.51 | 4100.918 | −2020.23 | n/a | 1.28 | 1.63 | 0.308 | 0.272 | 0.214 | 0.206 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.21 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| GTR+I | 30 | 4292.74 | 4104.144 | −2021.84 | 0.26 | n/a | 1.57 | 0.308 | 0.272 | 0.214 | 0.206 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| GTR+G+I | 31 | 4297.43 | 4102.564 | −2020.03 | 0.12 | 2.19 | 1.62 | 0.308 | 0.272 | 0.214 | 0.206 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.21 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| TN93 | 26 | 4300.35 | 4136.848 | −2042.25 | n/a | n/a | 1.49 | 0.308 | 0.272 | 0.214 | 0.206 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.2 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| HKY | 25 | 4300.37 | 4143.146 | −2046.41 | n/a | n/a | 1.48 | 0.308 | 0.272 | 0.214 | 0.206 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| GTR | 29 | 4318.23 | 4135.905 | −2038.74 | n/a | n/a | 1.49 | 0.308 | 0.272 | 0.214 | 0.206 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| JC+I | 22 | 4340.13 | 4201.74 | −2078.74 | 0.27 | n/a | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| JC+G | 22 | 4340.4 | 4202.007 | −2078.88 | n/a | 1.33 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| JC+G+I | 23 | 4347.15 | 4202.476 | −2078.1 | 0.21 | 4.52 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| JC | 21 | 4368.55 | 4236.441 | −2097.11 | n/a | n/a | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
Models with the lowest BIC scores (Bayesian information criterion) are considered to describe the substitution pattern the best. For each model, AICc value (Akaike information criterion, corrected), maximum likelihood value (lnL), and the number of parameters (including branch lengths) are also presented. Nonuniformity of evolutionary rates among sites may be modeled by using a discrete Gamma distribution (+G) with 5 rate categories and by assuming that a certain fraction of sites are evolutionarily invariable (+I). Whenever applicable, estimates of gamma shape parameter and/or the estimated fraction of invariant sites are shown. Assumed or estimated values of transition/transversion bias (R) are shown for each model, as well. They are followed by nucleotide frequencies (f) and rates of base substitutions (r) for each nucleotide pair. Relative values of instantaneous r should be considered when evaluating them. For simplicity, sum of r values is made equal to 1 for each model. For estimating ML values, a tree topology was automatically computed. The analysis involved 12 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were 1st+2nd+3rd+Noncoding. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 336 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6.
Figure 2Phylogenetic relationship of IL‐33 gene among species
Coding sequences similarity analysis and values of pair wise comparison of IL‐33 gene among different species
| Goat | Sheep | Cattle | Buffalo | Humans | Camel | Rabbit | Mouse | Rat | Cat | Dog | Horse | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goat | 98.74 | 93.74 | 94.56 | 80.1 | 86.55 | 71.93 | 66.57 | 66.42 | 80.81 | 79.7 | 79.97 | |
| Sheep | 98.74 | 92.72 | 93.58 | 79.76 | 86.13 | 71.52 | 66.72 | 66.12 | 80.23 | 79.11 | 79.26 | |
| Cattle | 93.74 | 92.72 | 96.57 | 79.07 | 88.36 | 70.16 | 67.94 | 66.87 | 81.42 | 80.37 | 81.42 | |
| Buffalo | 94.56 | 93.58 | 96.57 | 80.79 | 87.83 | 72.65 | 69.02 | 67.88 | 82.52 | 81.48 | 81.84 | |
| Humans | 80.1 | 79.76 | 79.07 | 80.79 | 79.85 | 76.7 | 72.59 | 72.2 | 80.97 | 80.27 | 78.47 | |
| Camel | 86.55 | 86.13 | 88.36 | 94.56 | 79.85 | 71.72 | 68.04 | 67.14 | 83.02 | 82.2 | 82.47 | |
| Rabbit | 71.93 | 71.52 | 70.16 | 72.65 | 76.7 | 71.72 | 67.78 | 66.01 | 71.08 | 72.07 | 70.78 | |
| Mouse | 66.57 | 66.72 | 67.94 | 69.02 | 72.59 | 68.04 | 67.78 | 88.43 | 68.75 | 67.42 | 66.84 | |
| Rat | 66.42 | 66.12 | 66.87 | 67.88 | 72.2 | 67.14 | 66.01 | 88.43 | 68.77 | 67.03 | 67.89 | |
| Cat | 80.81 | 80.23 | 81.42 | 82.52 | 80.97 | 83.02 | 71.08 | 68.75 | 68.77 | 88.54 | 82.33 | |
| Dog | 79.7 | 79.11 | 80.37 | 81.48 | 80.27 | 82.2 | 72.07 | 67.042 | 67.03 | 88.54 | 80.64 | |
| Horse | 79.97 | 79.26 | 81.42 | 81.84 | 78.47 | 82.47 | 70.78 | 66.84 | 67.89 | 82.33 | 80.64 |
Similar values under triangle (%) in different species.
Maximum likelihood analysis of natural selection codon by codon
| Codon# | CodonStart | Triplet | Syn (s) | Nonsyn (n) | Synsites (S) | Nonsynsites (N) | dS | dN | dN‐dS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 517 | GAA | 0 | 4 | 0.38 | 2.42 | 0 | 1.65 | 1.65 |
| 17 | 532 | TTA | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1.49 | 0 | 2.01 | 2.01 |
| 24 | 556 | AGT | 0 | 3 | 0.35 | 2.65 | 0 | 1.13 | 1.13 |
| 26 | 562 | CGG | 0 | 3 | 0.49 | 2.19 | 0 | 1.37 | 1.37 |
| 56 | 658 | AAC | 0 | 5 | 0.47 | 2.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 60 | 670 | GAA | 0 | 3 | 0.34 | 2.59 | 0 | 1.16 | 1.16 |
| 69 | 697 | ACG | 0 | 5 | 0.41 | 2.26 | 0 | 2.21 | 2.21 |
| 100 | 802 | GAT | 0 | 5 | 0.38 | 2.61 | 0 | 1.92 | 1.92 |
| 107 | 823 | ACA | 0 | 5 | 0.44 | 2.54 | 0 | 1.97 | 1.97 |
(S)Number of synonymous sites in a sequence, (N) Number of nonsynonymous sites in a sequence, (dS) Number of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site, (dN) Number of nonsynonymous substitutions per nonsynonymous site. ω = (dN‐dS) values >1 indicating significance.
Figure 3The graphical distributions of synonymous and nonsynonymous codon changes are counted
Codon‐based test of neutrality for analysis between sequences
| Goat | Sheep | Cattle | Humans | Rat | Mouse | Buffalo | Rabbit | Cat | Dog | Camel | Horse | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goat | −0.420 | −0.587 | −3.995 | −6.580 | −5.449 | −1.347 | −4.307 | −3.234 | −2.981 | −0.939 | −2.282 | |
| Sheep | 0.675 | −0.716 | −4.164 | −6.916 | −5.758 | −1.403 | −4.473 | −3.406 | −3.158 | −1.205 | −2.462 | |
| Cattle | 0.558 | 0.475 | −3.568 | −6.316 | −5.242 | −0.216 | −3.997 | −3.155 | −2.835 | −0.727 | −1.985 | |
| Humans | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 | −4.384 | −4.925 | −3.647 | −5.861 | −3.803 | −3.897 | −4.063 | −2.956 | |
| Rat | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −6.119 | −5.786 | −8.413 | −5.723 | −6.134 | −6.723 | −5.276 | |
| Mouse | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −4.730 | −6.807 | −5.910 | −6.760 | −4.929 | −5.721 | |
| Buffalo | 0.181 | 0.163 | 0.829 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −4.129 | −3.531 | −3.219 | −1.293 | −2.520 | |
| Rabbit | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −5.393 | −4.055 | −3.709 | −3.670 | |
| Cat | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | −2.552 | −3.526 | −3.852 | |
| Dog | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.005 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.012 | −2.740 | −2.778 | |
| Camel | 0.349 | 0.231 | 0.468 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.198 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.007 | −2.086 | |
| Horse | 0.024 | 0.015 | 0.049 | 0.004 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.013 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.006 | 0.039 |
Significance of nutrality, respectively.
Figure 4Antigenic domains of IL‐33 in goat
Figure 5Antigenic domains of IL‐33 in 12 species