Literature DB >> 28330884

Evaluation of bioMérieux's Dissociated Vidas Lyme IgM II and IgG II as a First-Tier Diagnostic Assay for Lyme Disease.

Claudia R Molins1, Mark J Delorey2, Adam Replogle2, Christopher Sexton2, Martin E Schriefer2.   

Abstract

The recommended laboratory diagnostic approach for Lyme disease is a standard two-tiered testing (STTT) algorithm where the first tier is typically an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) that if positive or equivocal is reflexed to Western immunoblotting as the second tier. bioMérieux manufactures one of the most commonly used first-tier EIAs in the United States, the combined IgM/IgG Vidas test (LYT). Recently, bioMérieux launched its dissociated first-tier tests, the Vidas Lyme IgM II (LYM) and IgG II (LYG) EIAs, which use purified recombinant test antigens and a different algorithm than STTT. The dissociated LYM/LYG EIAs were evaluated against the combined LYT EIA using samples from 471 well-characterized Lyme patients and controls. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess the performance of these EIAs as first-tier tests and when used in two-tiered algorithms, including a modified two-tiered testing (MTTT) approach where the second-tier test was a C6 EIA. Similar sensitivities and specificities were obtained for the two testing strategies (LYT versus LYM/LYG) when used as first-tier tests (sensitivity, 83 to 85%; specificity, 85 to 88%) with an observed agreement of 80%. Sensitivities of 68 to 69% and 76 to 77% and specificities of 97% and 98 to 99% resulted when the two EIA strategies were followed by Western immunoblotting and when used in an MTTT, respectively. The MTTT approach resulted in significantly higher sensitivities than did STTT. Overall, the LYM/LYG EIAs performed equivalently to the LYT EIA in test-to-test comparisons or as first-tier assays in STTT or MTTT with few exceptions.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Borrelia burgdorferi; Lyme disease; Vidas; serology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28330884      PMCID: PMC5442525          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02407-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  20 in total

Review 1.  vls Antigenic Variation Systems of Lyme Disease Borrelia: Eluding Host Immunity through both Random, Segmental Gene Conversion and Framework Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Steven J Norris
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2014-12

2.  Recommendations for test performance and interpretation from the Second National Conference on Serologic Diagnosis of Lyme Disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1995-08-11       Impact factor: 17.586

3.  Immunoblot interpretation criteria for serodiagnosis of early Lyme disease.

Authors:  S M Engstrom; E Shoop; R C Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Serodiagnosis in early Lyme disease.

Authors:  M E Aguero-Rosenfeld; J Nowakowski; D F McKenna; C A Carbonaro; G P Wormser
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Osp17, a novel immunodominant outer surface protein of Borrelia afzelii: recombinant expression in Escherichia coli and its use as a diagnostic antigen for serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis.

Authors:  S Jauris-Heipke; B Rössle; G Wanner; C Habermann; D Rössler; V Fingerle; G Lehnert; R Lobentanzer; I Pradel; B Hillenbrand; U Schulte-Spechtel; B Wilske
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Lyme Borreliosis Serology: Performance of Several Commonly Used Laboratory Diagnostic Tests and a Large Resource Panel of Well-Characterized Patient Samples.

Authors:  Claudia R Molins; Mark J Delorey; Christopher Sexton; Martin E Schriefer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Human antibody responses to VlsE antigenic variation protein of Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  M B Lawrenz; J M Hardham; R T Owens; J Nowakowski; A C Steere; G P Wormser; S J Norris
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparative reactivity of human sera to recombinant VlsE and other Borrelia burgdorferi antigens in class-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for Lyme borreliosis.

Authors:  Louis A Magnarelli; Matthew Lawrenz; Steven J Norris; Erol Fikrig
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Single-tier testing with the C6 peptide ELISA kit compared with two-tier testing for Lyme disease.

Authors:  Gary P Wormser; Martin Schriefer; Maria E Aguero-Rosenfeld; Andrew Levin; Allen C Steere; Robert B Nadelman; John Nowakowski; Adriana Marques; Barbara J B Johnson; J Stephen Dumler
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.803

10.  Serodiagnosis of Lyme disease by kinetic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using recombinant VlsE1 or peptide antigens of Borrelia burgdorferi compared with 2-tiered testing using whole-cell lysates.

Authors:  Rendi Murphree Bacon; Brad J Biggerstaff; Martin E Schriefer; Robert D Gilmore; Mario T Philipp; Allen C Steere; Gary P Wormser; Adriana R Marques; Barbara J B Johnson
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  9 in total

1.  A Fully Automated Multiplex Assay for Diagnosis of Lyme Disease with High Specificity and Improved Early Sensitivity.

Authors:  Johnnie B Hahm; John W Breneman; Jing Liu; Svetlana Rabkina; Weiming Zheng; Shuxia Zhou; Roger P Walker; Ravi Kaul
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of Modified Two-Tiered Testing Algorithms for Lyme Disease Laboratory Diagnosis Using Well-Characterized Serum Samples.

Authors:  Adoracion Pegalajar-Jurado; Martin E Schriefer; Ryan J Welch; Marc R Couturier; Tiffany MacKenzie; Rebecca J Clark; Laura V Ashton; Mark J Delorey; Claudia R Molins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Advances in Serodiagnostic Testing for Lyme Disease Are at Hand.

Authors:  John A Branda; Barbara A Body; Jeff Boyle; Bernard M Branson; Raymond J Dattwyler; Erol Fikrig; Noel J Gerald; Maria Gomes-Solecki; Martin Kintrup; Michel Ledizet; Andrew E Levin; Michael Lewinski; Lance A Liotta; Adriana Marques; Paul S Mead; Emmanuel F Mongodin; Segaran Pillai; Prasad Rao; William H Robinson; Kristian M Roth; Martin E Schriefer; Thomas Slezak; Jessica Snyder; Allen C Steere; Jan Witkowski; Susan J Wong; Steven E Schutzer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of Modified Two-Tiered Testing Algorithms for Lyme Disease Using Zeus Scientific Commercial Assays.

Authors:  Maroun M Sfeir; Jennifer K Meece; Elitza S Theel; Dane Granger; Thomas R Fritsche; Allen C Steere; John A Branda
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 11.677

5.  Revisiting the Lyme Disease Serodiagnostic Algorithm: the Momentum Gathers.

Authors:  Adriana R Marques
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis.

Authors:  John A Branda; Allen C Steere
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 7.  Immunoserological Diagnosis of Human Borrelioses: Current Knowledge and Perspectives.

Authors:  Emilie Talagrand-Reboul; Alice Raffetin; Pierre Zachary; Benoît Jaulhac; Carole Eldin
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 8.  Recent Advances in the Immunologic Method Applied to Tick-Borne Diseases in Brazil.

Authors:  Mônica E T Alcon-Chino; Salvatore G De-Simone
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-08-02

9.  A multiplex serologic platform for diagnosis of tick-borne diseases.

Authors:  Rafal Tokarz; Nischay Mishra; Teresa Tagliafierro; Stephen Sameroff; Adrian Caciula; Lokendrasingh Chauhan; Jigar Patel; Eric Sullivan; Azad Gucwa; Brian Fallon; Marc Golightly; Claudia Molins; Martin Schriefer; Adriana Marques; Thomas Briese; W Ian Lipkin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.