BACKGROUND: Nutrient claims are a commonly used marketing tactic, but the association between claims and nutritional quality of products is unknown. The objective of this study was to examine trends in the proportion of packaged food and beverage purchases with a nutrient claim, whether claims are associated with improved nutritional profile, and whether the proportion of purchases with claims differs by race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status. METHODS: This cross-sectional study examined nutrient claims on more than 80 million food and beverage purchases from a transaction-level database of 40,000 US households from 2008 to 2012. χ2 Tests were used to examine whether the proportion of purchases with a low/no-content claim changed over time or differed by race/ethnicity or household socioeconomic status. Pooled transactions were examined using t-tests to compare products' nutritional profiles overall and by food and beverage group. RESULTS: Thirteen percent of food and 35% of beverage purchases had a low-content claim. Prevalence of claims among purchases did not change over time. Low-fat claims were most prevalent for both foods and beverages (10% and 19%, respectively), followed by low-calorie (3% and 9%), low-sugar (2% and 8%), and low-sodium (2% for both) claims. Compared to purchases with no claim, purchases with any low-content claim had lower mean energy, total sugar, total fat, and sodium densities. However, the association between particular claim types and specific nutrient densities varied substantially, and purchases featuring a given low-content claim did not necessarily offer better overall nutritional profiles or better profiles for the claimed nutrient, relative to products without claims. In addition, there was substantial heterogeneity in associations between claims and nutrient densities within food and beverage groups. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in nutrient density by claim type and food and beverage group suggests that claims may have differential utility for certain foods or nutrients and, in some cases, may mislead about the overall nutritional quality of the food.
BACKGROUND: Nutrient claims are a commonly used marketing tactic, but the association between claims and nutritional quality of products is unknown. The objective of this study was to examine trends in the proportion of packaged food and beverage purchases with a nutrient claim, whether claims are associated with improved nutritional profile, and whether the proportion of purchases with claims differs by race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status. METHODS: This cross-sectional study examined nutrient claims on more than 80 million food and beverage purchases from a transaction-level database of 40,000 US households from 2008 to 2012. χ2 Tests were used to examine whether the proportion of purchases with a low/no-content claim changed over time or differed by race/ethnicity or household socioeconomic status. Pooled transactions were examined using t-tests to compare products' nutritional profiles overall and by food and beverage group. RESULTS: Thirteen percent of food and 35% of beverage purchases had a low-content claim. Prevalence of claims among purchases did not change over time. Low-fat claims were most prevalent for both foods and beverages (10% and 19%, respectively), followed by low-calorie (3% and 9%), low-sugar (2% and 8%), and low-sodium (2% for both) claims. Compared to purchases with no claim, purchases with any low-content claim had lower mean energy, total sugar, total fat, and sodium densities. However, the association between particular claim types and specific nutrient densities varied substantially, and purchases featuring a given low-content claim did not necessarily offer better overall nutritional profiles or better profiles for the claimed nutrient, relative to products without claims. In addition, there was substantial heterogeneity in associations between claims and nutrient densities within food and beverage groups. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in nutrient density by claim type and food and beverage group suggests that claims may have differential utility for certain foods or nutrients and, in some cases, may mislead about the overall nutritional quality of the food.
Authors: Ellis L Vyth; Ingrid H M Steenhuis; Jessica A Vlot; Anouk Wulp; Meefa G Hogenes; Danielle H Looije; Johannes Brug; Jacob C Seidell Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Dong D Wang; Cindy W Leung; Yanping Li; Eric L Ding; Stephanie E Chiuve; Frank B Hu; Walter C Willett Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Marissa G Hall; Allison J Lazard; Anna H Grummon; Jennifer R Mendel; Lindsey Smith Taillie Journal: Prev Med Date: 2020-01-23 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Aviva A Musicus; Sophia V Hua; Alyssa J Moran; Emily W Duffy; Marissa G Hall; Christina A Roberto; Francesca R Dillman Carpentier; Sarah Sorscher; Margo G Wootan; Lindsey Smith Taillie; Eric B Rimm Journal: Appetite Date: 2021-12-27 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Elizabeth K Dunford; Lindsey Smith Taillie; Donna R Miles; Helen Eyles; Lizbeth Tolentino-Mayo; Shu Wen Ng Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-02-24 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Lluis Serra-Majem; António Raposo; Javier Aranceta-Bartrina; Gregorio Varela-Moreiras; Caomhan Logue; Hugo Laviada; Susana Socolovsky; Carmen Pérez-Rodrigo; Jorge Antonio Aldrete-Velasco; Eduardo Meneses Sierra; Rebeca López-García; Adriana Ortiz-Andrellucchi; Carmen Gómez-Candela; Rodrigo Abreu; Erick Alexanderson; Rolando Joel Álvarez-Álvarez; Ana Luisa Álvarez Falcón; Arturo Anadón; France Bellisle; Ina Alejandra Beristain-Navarrete; Raquel Blasco Redondo; Tommaso Bochicchio; José Camolas; Fernando G Cardini; Márcio Carocho; Maria do Céu Costa; Adam Drewnowski; Samuel Durán; Víctor Faundes; Roxana Fernández-Condori; Pedro P García-Luna; Juan Carlos Garnica; Marcela González-Gross; Carlo La Vecchia; Rosaura Leis; Ana María López-Sobaler; Miguel Agustín Madero; Ascensión Marcos; Luis Alfonso Mariscal Ramírez; Danika M Martyn; Lorenza Mistura; Rafael Moreno Rojas; José Manuel Moreno Villares; José Antonio Niño-Cruz; María Beatriz P P Oliveira; Nieves Palacios Gil-Antuñano; Lucía Pérez-Castells; Lourdes Ribas-Barba; Rodolfo Rincón Pedrero; Pilar Riobó; Juan Rivera Medina; Catarina Tinoco de Faria; Roxana Valdés-Ramos; Elsa Vasco; Sandra N Wac; Guillermo Wakida; Carmina Wanden-Berghe; Luis Xóchihua Díaz; Sergio Zúñiga-Guajardo; Vasiliki Pyrogianni; Sérgio Cunha Velho de Sousa Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Emily W Duffy; Marissa G Hall; Francesca R Dillman Carpentier; Aviva A Musicus; Michele L Meyer; Eric Rimm; Lindsey Smith Taillie Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 5.234