A Susana Ramírez1, Kimberly Arellano Carmona2. 1. School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, University of California, Merced 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, CA, 95343, USA. Electronic address: sramirez37@ucmerced.edu. 2. School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, University of California, Merced 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, CA, 95343, USA. Electronic address: karellanocarmona@ucmerced.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fatalism - beliefs about the causes and controllability of disease - has been negatively associated with prevention behaviors. Fatalism has been suggested as a mechanism for health disparities because ethnic minorities are especially likely to hold fatalistic beliefs. However, the construct has been criticized: Fatalism fails to account for structural barriers to health faced by vulnerable populations that also score highly on measures of fatalism. Another critique suggests that operationalizations of fatalism expose communication failures: "Fatalism" rather reflects information overload from an environment riddled with misinformation and contradictions. This study aimed to expand understanding of one mechanism through which communication may contribute to disparities by considering the context of nutrition among bicultural Latinas, who face increased risk from dietary acculturation. METHOD: Mixed-methods (semi-structured in-depth interview, survey) with Mexican-American women ages 18-29 (n = 24) in rural California. RESULTS: Contrary to previous studies, the majority of this sample of Mexican-American women did not endorse fatalistic beliefs; most demonstrated clear understanding of the link between diet and risk of diseases: Diabetes and heart disease were understood to result from behaviors within one's control. Yet despite articulating links between diet and disease, participants felt overloaded and confused about conflicting information from public and interpersonal sources. Moreover, despite reporting feeling inundated with information, participants noted critical information gaps, distinguishing between information available and information needed. CONCLUSIONS: We found minimal support for fatalistic beliefs among a sample of Mexican-American women, but considerable information overload and confusion, together with a desire for specific knowledge and skills. Results extend understanding of how communication may influence disparities: Information overload may be conflated with fatalism, challenging the notion that fatalism is a cultural belief. Moreover, inequalities in access to and ability to process information compound overload effects. We discuss opportunities to improve the clarity of communication about nutrition science and dietary recommendations.
BACKGROUND: Fatalism - beliefs about the causes and controllability of disease - has been negatively associated with prevention behaviors. Fatalism has been suggested as a mechanism for health disparities because ethnic minorities are especially likely to hold fatalistic beliefs. However, the construct has been criticized: Fatalism fails to account for structural barriers to health faced by vulnerable populations that also score highly on measures of fatalism. Another critique suggests that operationalizations of fatalism expose communication failures: "Fatalism" rather reflects information overload from an environment riddled with misinformation and contradictions. This study aimed to expand understanding of one mechanism through which communication may contribute to disparities by considering the context of nutrition among bicultural Latinas, who face increased risk from dietary acculturation. METHOD: Mixed-methods (semi-structured in-depth interview, survey) with Mexican-American women ages 18-29 (n = 24) in rural California. RESULTS: Contrary to previous studies, the majority of this sample of Mexican-American women did not endorse fatalistic beliefs; most demonstrated clear understanding of the link between diet and risk of diseases: Diabetes and heart disease were understood to result from behaviors within one's control. Yet despite articulating links between diet and disease, participants felt overloaded and confused about conflicting information from public and interpersonal sources. Moreover, despite reporting feeling inundated with information, participants noted critical information gaps, distinguishing between information available and information needed. CONCLUSIONS: We found minimal support for fatalistic beliefs among a sample of Mexican-American women, but considerable information overload and confusion, together with a desire for specific knowledge and skills. Results extend understanding of how communication may influence disparities: Information overload may be conflated with fatalism, challenging the notion that fatalism is a cultural belief. Moreover, inequalities in access to and ability to process information compound overload effects. We discuss opportunities to improve the clarity of communication about nutrition science and dietary recommendations.
Authors: Meghan Bridgid Moran; Joyee S Chatterjee; Lauren B Frank; Sheila T Murphy; Nan Zhao; Nancy Chen; Sandra Ball-Rokeach Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2017-08
Authors: Jakob D Jensen; Jackilen Shannon; Ronaldo Iachan; Yangyang Deng; Sunny Jung Kim; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Babalola Faseru; Electra D Paskett; Jinxiang Hu; Robin C Vanderpool; DeAnn Lazovich; Jason A Mendoza; Sanjay Shete; Linda B Robertson; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Katherine J Briant; Benjamin Haaland; David A Haggstrom; Bernard F Fuemmeler Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 4.090
Authors: Michael S Wolf; Marina Serper; Lauren Opsasnick; Rachel M O'Conor; Laura Curtis; Julia Yoshino Benavente; Guisselle Wismer; Stephanie Batio; Morgan Eifler; Pauline Zheng; Andrea Russell; Marina Arvanitis; Daniela Ladner; Mary Kwasny; Stephen D Persell; Theresa Rowe; Jeffrey A Linder; Stacy C Bailey Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2020-04-09 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Denise D Payán; L Karina Díaz Rios; A Susana Ramírez; Maria-Elena De Trinidad Young Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2021-02-07 Impact factor: 5.234