| Literature DB >> 28330280 |
Yong-Hong Liu1,2,3, Jian-Wei Guo1,4, Nimaichand Salam2, Li Li1, Yong-Guang Zhang1, Jian Han1,3, Osama Abdalla Mohamad1,5, Wen-Jun Li6,7.
Abstract
Xinjiang, a region of high salinity and drought, is a host to many arid and semi-arid plants. Many of these plants including Ferula spp. have indigenous pharmaceutical histories. As many of the medicinal properties of plants are in tandem with the associated microorganisms residing within the plant tissues, it is advisable to explore the endophytic potential of such plants. In the present study, diversity of culturable bacteria isolated from medicinal plants Ferula songorica collected from Hebukesaier, Xinjiang were analyzed. A total of 170 endophytic bacteria belonging to three phyla, 15 orders, 20 families and 27 genera were isolated and characterized by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The phylum Actinobacteria constitutes a major portion of the endophytic microbes isolated from the plant Ferula songorica (107 isolates). Overall endophytic species richness of the sample was 58 taxa while the sample has statistical values of 4.02, 0.97, 0.65 and 16.55 with Shannon's, Simpson, Species evenness and Margalef, respectively. Root tissues were found to be more suitable host for endophytes as compared to leaf and stem tissues. Among these endophytic strains, 88 % can grow on nitrogen-free media, 19 % solubilize phosphate, while 26 and 40 % are positive for production of protease and cellulase, respectively. The results confirm that the medicinal plant Ferula songorica represents an extremely rich reservoir for the isolation of diverged bacteria with potential for growth promoting factors and biologically active compounds including enzymes.Entities:
Keywords: Diversity; Endophytes; Enzyme; Ferula songorica; Growth promotion
Year: 2016 PMID: 28330280 PMCID: PMC5040645 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-016-0522-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Compositions of the nine different media used for the isolation of endophytic bacteria from plant samples
| Medium | Composition (g/L) | References |
|---|---|---|
| M1 | Sodium propionate, 2; | Wang ( |
| M2 | Yeast, 0.25; K2HPO4, 0.5; NaCl, 30; agar, 15 | Wang ( |
| M3 | Sodium propionate, 2; | Li ( |
| M4 | Cellulose, 2.5; sodium pyruvate, 2; KNO3, 0.25; proline, 1; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.2; K2HPO4, 0.2; CaCl2, 0.5; FeSO4·7H2O, 10 mg; NaCl, 30; agar, 15 | Modified from Qin et al. ( |
| M5 | Sodium oxalate, 2; Casein hydrolysate 0.5; KH2PO4, 0.3; Na2HPO4·12H2O, 0.5; NaCl, 30; ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.02; CaCl2, 0.5; agar, 15 | Wang ( |
| M6 | Glycerol, 10; | Shirling and Gottlieb ( |
| M7 | Added to Sodium propionate, 1; | Modified from Qin et al. ( |
| M8 | Sodium propionate, 2; Arginine, 1; NaCl, 30; MgSO4·7H2O, 1; KH2PO4, 0.1; FeSO4·7H2O, 0.05; agar, 15 | Wang ( |
| M9 | Soluble starch, 20; KNO3, 1; K2HPO4, 0.5; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.5; NaCl, 0.5; FeSO4·7H2O, 0.01; agar, 15 | Shirling and Gottlieb ( |
Distribution of strains isolated from Ferula songorica
| Phyla (3) | Orders (15) | Families (20) | Genera (27) | Species | Strains |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (58) | (170) | ||||
|
|
|
|
| 3 | 9 |
|
| 1 | 1 | |||
|
| 1 | 3 | |||
|
|
| 4 | 5 | ||
|
| 3 | 11 | |||
|
| 3 | 5 | |||
|
|
| 1 | 1 | ||
|
|
| 2 | 5 | ||
|
|
|
| 3 | 8 | |
|
|
|
| 1 | 4 | |
|
| 1 | 1 | |||
|
| 1 | 1 | |||
|
|
|
| 5 | 7 | |
|
|
|
| 2 | 2 | |
|
| 1 | 1 | |||
|
|
|
| 1 | 1 | |
|
|
|
| 2 | 2 | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 | 22 |
|
|
|
| 2 | 7 | |
|
|
|
| 1 | 1 | |
|
|
|
| 2 | 7 | |
|
|
| 1 | 14 | ||
|
|
|
| 1 | 1 | |
|
|
|
| 1 | 5 | |
|
|
|
| 1 | 23 | |
|
|
|
|
| 1 | 1 |
|
|
| 9 | 22 |
Fig. 1Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree based on partial 16S rRNA gene sequences of the representative strains. Numbers in the branches represent the bootstrapping percentage that supports the branch with 1000 bootstrap replications
Diversity of endophytic strains
| Individuals | Taxa_S | Shannon_H | Simpson | Evenness | Margalef | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf and stem | 82 | 40 | 3.42 | 0.96 | 0.76 | 8.85 |
| Root | 88 | 43 | 3.9 | 0.97 | 0.79 | 13.62 |
| Total | 170 | 58 | 4.02 | 0.97 | 0.65 | 16.55 |
(Shannon H: variety; Simpson: dominance index; Evenness: uniformity; Margalef: abundance)
Fig. 2Diversity of endophytic strains from Ferula songorica
Characteristics and enzymatic screening of some representative strains
| Strain | Closest homolog | Growth promoting activity | Enzyme activity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fix N | Solubilize P | Protease | Cellulase | ||
| SZ4R5S4 |
| + | ++ | − | − |
| SZ4R6S2 | + | +++ | − | − | |
| SZ4S5S1 |
| + | − | + | ++ |
| SZ4S81 |
| + | − | + | + |
| SZ4R7S10 |
| + | + | ++ | ++ |
| SZ4R7S8 | − | − | + | +++ | |
| SZ4R3S14 |
| + | − | − | − |
| SZ4S8S14 | + | − | − | + | |
| SZ4SGS1 |
| + | − | + | ++ |
| SZ4R1S6 |
| + | + | ++ | + |
| SZ4R3S8 |
| + | + | − | + |
| SZ4S6S2 | + | + | + | + | |
| SZ4S5S2 | + | + | − | + | |
| SZ4R5S3 | + | + | − | + | |
| SZ4S8S16 | + | − | − | + | |
| SZ4R3S7 |
| + | − | + | + |
| SZ4S8S4 |
| − | − | +++ | − |
| SZ4S10S1 |
| + | − | − | − |
| SZ4S8S2 |
| + | + | − | − |
| SZ4S7S13 |
| − | − | +++ | − |
| SZ4S7S14 |
| + | − | − | − |
| SZ4S4S9 |
| + | +++ | − | − |
The ability to solubilize P, protease and cellulase were represented by halo diameter/colony diameter (R/r) whereby
– (negative), R/r = 1.0 cm (without halo zone and no enzyme activity); + (weakly positive), 1.0 cm < R/r < 2.0 cm; ++ (moderately positive), 2.0 cm ≤ R/r < 3.0 cm; +++ (strongly positive), R/R ≥ 3.0 cm
The ability of fix N was recorded as “+” if strain grows on both the nitrogen growth media