| Literature DB >> 34288351 |
Jin-Tian Li1,2, Jing-Li Lu1, Hong-Yu Wang1, Zhou Fang1, Xiao-Juan Wang1, Shi-Wei Feng1, Zhang Wang1, Ting Yuan2, Sheng-Chang Zhang2, Shu-Ning Ou1, Xiao-Dan Yang1, Zhuo-Hui Wu1, Xiang-Deng Du2, Ling-Yun Tang2, Bin Liao2, Wen-Sheng Shu1,3, Pu Jia1, Jie-Liang Liang1.
Abstract
Phosphate-solubilizing microbes (PSMs) drive the biogeochemical cycling of phosphorus (P) and hold promise for sustainable agriculture. However, their global distribution, overall diversity and application potential remain unknown. Here, we present the first synthesis of their biogeography, diversity and utility, employing data from 399 papers published between 1981 and 2017, the results of a nationwide field survey in China consisting of 367 soil samples, and a genetic analysis of 12986 genome-sequenced prokaryotic strains. We show that at continental to global scales, the population density of PSMs in environmental samples is correlated with total P rather than pH. Remarkably, positive relationships exist between the population density of soil PSMs and available P, nitrate-nitrogen and dissolved organic carbon in soil, reflecting functional couplings between PSMs and microbes driving biogeochemical cycles of nitrogen and carbon. More than 2704 strains affiliated with at least nine archaeal, 88 fungal and 336 bacterial species were reported as PSMs. Only 2.59% of these strains have been tested for their efficiencies in improving crop growth or yield under field conditions, providing evidence that PSMs are more likely to exert positive effects on wheat growing in alkaline P-deficient soils. Our systematic genetic analysis reveals five promising PSM genera deserving much more attention.Entities:
Keywords: agricultural sustainability; biofertilizer; biogeography; genotype; phenotype; phosphate-solubilizing microorganism; plant yield; population size
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34288351 PMCID: PMC9291587 DOI: 10.1111/brv.12779
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc ISSN: 0006-3231
Fig 1Global patterns of the population density of phosphate‐solubilizing microbes (PSMs) in the environment. (A) Locations of the 117 sites at which the population density of PSMs in environmental samples was determined. Sample types are indicated by coloured circles. The numbers of data points for the indicated sample types are given in parentheses in the key. The size of a circle on the map is proportional to the number of data points for a given sample type at that site. Circles with more than one colour indicate that more than one type of sample was collected from these sites. Some sites are close to each other, leading to overlaps among circles. (B–D) Effects of total P (B), pH (C) and mean annual temperature (D) of the study sites on the population density of PSMs. Colour coding of symbols is as in A. See Table S1 for source data.
Fig 2Patterns of the population density of soil phosphate‐solubilizing microbes (PSMs) across China. (A) Locations of the 40 sites at which the population densities of soil PSMs were investigated in our field survey. Habitat types are indicated by coloured circles. The numbers of soil samples for the indicated habitat types are given in parentheses in the key. The area of a circle on the map is proportional to the number of soil samples for a given habitat type at that site. Circles with more than one colour indicate that soil samples were collected from more than one type of habitat at these sites. Some sites are close to each other, leading to overlaps between some circles. (B–G) Effects of total P (B), available P (C), pH (D), nitrate‐nitrogen (NO3 −‐N, E), dissolved organic carbon (DOC, F) and mean annual temperature (G) of the study sites on the population density of soil PSMs. See Table S2 for source data.
Fig 3Overall diversity of phosphate‐solubilizing microbes (PSMs) reported in the literature. (A, B) The number of taxa of PSM subgroups divided according to domain (A) and substrate preference for phosphate solubilization (B). PSMO and PSMI represent microbes that can solubilize organic and inorganic phosphates, respectively; PSMI&O represents those that can solubilize both organic and inorganic phosphates. (C, D) Phylogenies showing genera represented by all 2704 identified PSM strains. The genera with more than 10 PSM strains are highlighted with red branches in the phylogenies. The two rings outside the phylogenies indicate the contributions of individual genera to the total identified PSM (inner ring) and PSMI&O strains (outer ring). Seven bacterial and two fungal genera (each with >100 identified PSM strains or >5 identified PSMI&O strains) considered the main PSM genera are identified with numbers on the outermost ring. See Table S3 for source data.
Fig 4Performance of phosphate‐solubilizing microbes (PSMs) in improving plant growth or yield. (A) Overview of reported experiments addressing the performance of PSMs in improving plant growth or yield. The number of experiments for a given subgroup according to experiment type, plant type or measure of effect is given in parentheses. (B–E) Important factors influencing the performance of PSMs on crop growth or yield in field experiments. (B, C) There are significant differences between experiments showing positive effects of PSMs and those showing no effects for soil pH (B) and available P (C). (D, E) Potential effects of crop and PSM types on the performance of PSMs. In A–C the results of a Tukey's HSD test and a Student's t‐test are shown: *, ** and *** represent P < 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001, respectively. Numbers above the bars in B–E indicate the numbers of experiments for the respective subgroups. See Table S4 for source data.
Fig 5Phylogenetic distribution of prokaryotic genomes with the genetic potential for phosphate solubilization. Genera represented by prokaryotic genomes with (A) acid phosphatase (AP)‐, (B) alkaline phosphatase (ALP)‐, (C) phytase‐ and (D) glucose dehydrogenase (GCD)‐positive genotypes, respectively. The genera rich in genotypes of interest (i.e. groups of genera that contain no less than 30 sequenced genomes individually, and 50% of these genomes contain genes encoding an enzyme of interest) are highlighted by red branches in the phylogenies. Singletons (i.e. genera with only one genome containing genes encoding an enzyme of interest) were excluded from our analysis and are not shown in the phylogenies. The inner ring with blue bars surrounding the phylogenies indicates the proportion of enzyme‐positive genomes of a given genus to the total sequenced genomes of that genus. The outer ring with brown bars indicates the contribution of individual genera to the total enzyme‐positive genotypes of interest. Six genera rich in AP/ALP/phytase‐positive and GCD‐positive genotypes (i.e. genomes with genetic potential for both organic and inorganic phosphate solubilization), considered promising PSM genera, are marked by numbers in the outermost ring. See Tables [Link], [Link] for source data.