Keren Ladin1,2, Katie Buttafarro1,2, Emily Hahn2, Susan Koch-Weser3, Daniel E Weiner4. 1. Department of Occupational Therapy, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts. 2. Research on Aging, Ethics, and Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts. 3. Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Purpose: Between 2000 and 2012, the incident dialysis population in the United States increased by nearly 60%, most sharply among adults 75 years and older. End-of-life (EOL) conversations among dialysis patients are associated with better patient-centered outcomes and lower use of aggressive interventions in the last month of life. This study examined how health literacy may affect engagement, comprehension, and satisfaction with EOL conversations among elderly dialysis patients. Design and Methods: Qualitative/descriptive study with semi-structured interviews about health literacy, EOL conversations, and goals of care with 31 elderly dialysis patients at 2 centers in Boston. Themes were interpreted in the context of Nutbeam's health literacy framework. Results: Despite high mortality risk in this population, only 13% of patients had discussed EOL preferences with physicians, half had discussed EOL with their social network, and 25% of participants explicitly stated that they had never considered EOL preferences. Less than 30% of participants could correctly define terminology commonly used in EOL conversations. Analyses yielded 5 themes: (1) Misunderstanding EOL terminology; (2) Nephrologists reluctant to discuss EOL; (3) Patients conforming to socially constructed roles; (4) Discordant expectations and dialysis experiences; and (5) Reconciling EOL values and future care. Patients had limited understanding of EOL terminology, lacked of opportunities for meaningful EOL discussion with providers and family, resulting in uncertainty about future care. Implications: Limited health literacy presents a substantial barrier to communication and could lead to older adults committing to an intensive pattern of care without adequate information. Clinicians should consider health literacy when discussing dialysis initiation.
Purpose: Between 2000 and 2012, the incident dialysis population in the United States increased by nearly 60%, most sharply among adults 75 years and older. End-of-life (EOL) conversations among dialysis patients are associated with better patient-centered outcomes and lower use of aggressive interventions in the last month of life. This study examined how health literacy may affect engagement, comprehension, and satisfaction with EOL conversations among elderly dialysis patients. Design and Methods: Qualitative/descriptive study with semi-structured interviews about health literacy, EOL conversations, and goals of care with 31 elderly dialysis patients at 2 centers in Boston. Themes were interpreted in the context of Nutbeam's health literacy framework. Results: Despite high mortality risk in this population, only 13% of patients had discussed EOL preferences with physicians, half had discussed EOL with their social network, and 25% of participants explicitly stated that they had never considered EOL preferences. Less than 30% of participants could correctly define terminology commonly used in EOL conversations. Analyses yielded 5 themes: (1) Misunderstanding EOL terminology; (2) Nephrologists reluctant to discuss EOL; (3) Patients conforming to socially constructed roles; (4) Discordant expectations and dialysis experiences; and (5) Reconciling EOL values and future care. Patients had limited understanding of EOL terminology, lacked of opportunities for meaningful EOL discussion with providers and family, resulting in uncertainty about future care. Implications: Limited health literacy presents a substantial barrier to communication and could lead to older adults committing to an intensive pattern of care without adequate information. Clinicians should consider health literacy when discussing dialysis initiation.
Authors: Rachel Urquhart-Secord; Jonathan C Craig; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Helen Tam-Tham; Braden Manns; Martin Howell; Kevan R Polkinghorne; Peter G Kerr; David C Harris; Stephanie Thompson; Kara Schick-Makaroff; David C Wheeler; Wim van Biesen; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; David W Johnson; Kirsten Howard; Nicole Evangelidis; Allison Tong Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Angelo E Volandes; Laurie Anne Ferguson; Aretha D Davis; Nathan C Hull; Michael J Green; Yuchiao Chang; Kristy Deep; Michael K Paasche-Orlow Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2011-01-21 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Melissa W Wachterman; Edward R Marcantonio; Roger B Davis; Robert A Cohen; Sushrut S Waikar; Russell S Phillips; Ellen P McCarthy Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-07-08 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Dean Schillinger; John Piette; Kevin Grumbach; Frances Wang; Clifford Wilson; Carolyn Daher; Krishelle Leong-Grotz; Cesar Castro; Andrew B Bindman Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2003-01-13
Authors: Claire A Richards; Chuan-Fen Liu; Paul L Hebert; Mary Ersek; Melissa W Wachterman; Lynn F Reinke; Leslie L Taylor; Ann M O'Hare Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Sarah J Ramer; Nicolas A Baddour; Edward D Siew; Huzaifah Salat; Aihua Bian; Thomas G Stewart; Susan P Y Wong; Manisha Jhamb; Khaled Abdel-Kader Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2020-07-28 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Allison Tong; Andrew S Levey; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Samaya Anumudu; Cristina M Arce; Amanda Baumgart; Louese Dunn; Talia Gutman; Tess Harris; Liz Lightstone; Nicole Scholes-Robertson; Jenny I Shen; David C Wheeler; David M White; Martin Wilkie; Jonathan C Craig; Michel Jadoul; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Keren Ladin; Renuka Pandya; Allison Kannam; Rohini Loke; Tira Oskoui; Ronald D Perrone; Klemens B Meyer; Daniel E Weiner; John B Wong Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Keren Ladin; Renuka Pandya; Ronald D Perrone; Klemens B Meyer; Allison Kannam; Rohini Loke; Tira Oskoui; Daniel E Weiner; John B Wong Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Nwamaka D Eneanya; Shananssa G Percy; Taylor L Stallings; Wei Wang; David J R Steele; Michael J Germain; Jane O Schell; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Angelo E Volandes Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Jennifer L Barton; Sheila Markwardt; Meike Niederhausen; Allison Schue; Jacob Dougherty; Patricia Katz; Somnath Saha; Edward H Yelin Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2021-09-27 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Marco D Boonstra; Sijmen A Reijneveld; Elisabeth M Foitzik; Ralf Westerhuis; Gerjan Navis; Andrea F de Winter Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2020-12-22 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Keren Ladin; Isabel Neckermann; Noah D'Arcangelo; Susan Koch-Weser; John B Wong; Elisa J Gordon; Ana Rossi; Dena Rifkin; Tamara Isakova; Daniel E Weiner Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 14.978