Literature DB >> 8883075

Strategies to improve cancer education materials.

L G Doak1, C C Doak, C D Meade.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To highlight the benefits of creating effective materials for cancer education; to describe strategies to enhance the suitability of materials for all readers, including those with limited literacy skills. DATA SOURCES: Published research and education articles, health education models and theories, the National Cancer Institute Office of Cancer Communications, and personal experiences. DATA SYNTHESIS: Written materials, including visuals, commonly are used to convey cancer life-style risks, detection methods, treatments and procedures, and informed consent information. Such materials are relevant and suitable only when they can be read and understood and are matched to patients' reading abilities. A systematic process to achieve effective written materials includes assessing the target audience, limiting the educational objectives, focusing the content on the desired behaviors, presenting the context of the message first, and planning for reader interaction. The final step is verification of comprehension and suitability with the target audience.
CONCLUSIONS: The creation of effective cancer education materials can be achieved by employing strategies that aim to enhance patient understandability, usability, relevancy, and motivation. Learner verification is a quality control process and a technique that helps ensure that materials are suitable for the intended audience and better matched to patients' learning needs. NURSING IMPLICATIONS: Nurses can improve the understandability of cancer education by using a variety of learning enhancement techniques and a set of organized planning steps. Such strategies can serve to improve the communication of cancer information to target groups with diverse literacy skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8883075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  63 in total

1.  Barbershop communications on prostate cancer screening using barber health advisers.

Authors:  John S Luque; Brian M Rivers; Clement K Gwede; Maisha Kambon; B Lee Green; Cathy D Meade
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2010-04-21

Review 2.  Developing effective cancer pain education programs.

Authors:  Michelle Y Martin; Maria Pisu; Elizabeth A Kvale; Shelley A Johns
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-08

3.  'Simple and easy:' providers' and latinos' perceptions of the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Claudia X Aguado Loi; Dinorah Martinez Tyson; Enmanuel A Chavarria; Liliana Gutierrez; Lynne Klasko; Stacy Davis; Diana Lopez; Tracy Johns; Cathy D Meade; Clement K Gwede
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 4.  Promoting health literacy.

Authors:  Alexa T McCray
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Adapting smoking relapse-prevention materials for pregnant and postpartum women: formative research.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Quinn; Bethany Bell Ellison; Cathy Meade; C Nannette Roach; Elena Lopez; Terrance Albrecht; Thomas H Brandon
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-12-10

6.  Variation in the readability of items within surveys.

Authors:  José L Calderón; Leo S Morales; Honghu Liu; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Pictogram evaluation and authoring collaboration environment.

Authors:  Hyeoneui Kim; Dorothy Tamayo; Michael Muhkin; Jaemin Kim; Julius Lam; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Eliah Aronoff-Spencer
Journal:  NI 2012 (2012)       Date:  2012-06-23

8.  Imagined anatomy and other lessons from learner verification interviews with Mexican immigrant women.

Authors:  Jennifer Hunter; Patricia J Kelly
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2012-10-02

9.  Understood? Evaluating the readability and understandability of intranasal corticosteroid delivery instructions.

Authors:  Saangyoung E Lee; William C Brown; Mark W Gelpi; Adam J Kimple; Brent A Senior; Adam M Zanation; Brian D Thorp; Charles S Ebert
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.858

10.  ACCISS study rationale and design: activating collaborative cancer information service support for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel; Veenu Randhawa; H Gene McFadden; Angela Fought; Emily Bullard; Bonnie Spring
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.