Literature DB >> 28327996

Genome sequencing of the sweetpotato whitefly Bemisia tabaci MED/Q.

Wen Xie1, Chunhai Chen2, Zezhong Yang1, Litao Guo1, Xin Yang1, Dan Wang2, Ming Chen2, Jinqun Huang2, Yanan Wen1, Yang Zeng1, Yating Liu1, Jixing Xia1, Lixia Tian1, Hongying Cui1, Qingjun Wu1, Shaoli Wang1, Baoyun Xu1, Xianchun Li3, Xinqiu Tan4, Murad Ghanim5, Baoli Qiu6, Huipeng Pan6, Dong Chu7, Helene Delatte8, M N Maruthi9, Feng Ge10, Xueping Zhou11, Xiaowei Wang12, Fanghao Wan11, Yuzhou Du13, Chen Luo14, Fengming Yan15, Evan L Preisser16, Xiaoguo Jiao17, Brad S Coates18, Jinyang Zhao2, Qiang Gao2, Jinquan Xia2, Ye Yin2, Yong Liu4, Judith K Brown3, Xuguo Joe Zhou19, Youjun Zhang1.   

Abstract

The sweetpotato whitefly Bemisia tabaci is a highly destructive agricultural and ornamental crop pest. It damages host plants through both phloem feeding and vectoring plant pathogens. Introductions of B. tabaci are difficult to quarantine and eradicate because of its high reproductive rates, broad host plant range, and insecticide resistance. A total of 791 Gb of raw DNA sequence from whole genome shotgun sequencing, and 13 BAC pooling libraries were generated by Illumina sequencing using different combinations of mate-pair and pair-end libraries. Assembly gave a final genome with a scaffold N50 of 437 kb, and a total length of 658 Mb. Annotation of repetitive elements and coding regions resulted in 265.0 Mb TEs (40.3%) and 20 786 protein-coding genes with putative gene family expansions, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis based on orthologs across 14 arthropod taxa suggested that MED/Q is clustered into a hemipteran clade containing A. pisum and is a sister lineage to a clade containing both R. prolixus and N. lugens. Genome completeness, as estimated using the CEGMA and Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs pipelines, reached 96% and 79%. These MED/Q genomic resources lay a foundation for future 'pan-genomic' comparisons of invasive vs. noninvasive, invasive vs. invasive, and native vs. exotic Bemisia, which, in return, will open up new avenues of investigation into whitefly biology, evolution, and management.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Annotation; Assembly; Genomics; Whitefly Bemisia tabaci

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28327996      PMCID: PMC5467035          DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/gix018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gigascience        ISSN: 2047-217X            Impact factor:   6.524


Introduction

Samples and libraries construction

As a globally invasive species, the phloem-feeding whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Genn.; hereafter ‘Bemisia’) has been found on all continents except Antarctica [1,2]. Taxonomically, B. tabaci is considered a species complex that contains several morphologically indistinguishable but genetically distinct ‘cryptic species’ [2-7]. The Bemisia Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1, or ‘B’) cryptic species is highly invasive and has emerged as a major pest in the United States, Caribbean Basin, Latin America, Middle East [1], and East Asia [8]. Similarly, the invasive Bemisia Mediterranean (MED, or ‘Q’) cryptic species has been introduced into several geographic locations and has become established throughout China [9,10]. Despite substantial research and the recently published whitefly B. tabaci MEAM1/B genome [11], however, the genetic or genomic basis of MED/Q remains obscure. The MED/Q B. tabaci adult whitefly females (2n) and males (1n) were initially collected from infested field-grown cucumber plants in Beijing, China during 2011 and used to establish a laboratory colony (MED/Q) at the Institute of Vegetable and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Science by transferring adult males and females to caged pepper plants (10–12 leaf stage). Results of mtCOI gene PCR-RFLP assays [12] and direct DNA sequencing followed by phylogenetic evaluation against reference sequences [13] both confirmed that the Bemisia in the MED/Q colony belonged to the Q1 haplotype group, or western Mediterranean region clade (data not shown). The MED/Q whitefly colony was used as the source initial short shotgun Illumina sequencing. Adult whiteflies fed using Parafilm membrane sachets containing a 25% sucrose solution for 48 hours prior to collection of ∼5000 male and female adults (∼50:50). Samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for 3 hours prior to transfer to a −80°C freezer. This genomic DNA was used to construct Illumina TruSeq paired end (PE) sequencing libraries (170-, 250-, 300-, 500-, and 800-bp insert sizes) and mate pair (MP) libraries (2, 5, 10, 20, and 40 kb in size) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Additionally, two Illumina PE sequencing libraries (∼500-bp and 800-bp inserts) were constructed from whole genome amplification (WGA) reactions carried out on genomic DNA isolated from two adult male whiteflies. We also constructed 13 BAC libraries with pooling of clones and Illumina library construction according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Genome sequencing and assembly

All libraries were sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq 2000 using 100-bp reads from both fragment ends, and raw data processed and assembled as shown (Supplemental Table S1; Supplemental Fig. S1). Briefly, a series of filtering steps was performed on the raw reads to filter out the following: (1) reads with >10% Ns, >40% low-quality bases, >10 bp overlapping with adapter sequences, allowing no more than 3-bp mismatches; (2) paired-end reads that overlapped >10 bp between two ends, with insert size >200-bp libraries; and (3) duplicated reads generated by PCR amplification during the construction of the large-insert library. Filtered reads were used for K-mer determination within subsequent assembly steps. The frequency of each K-mer was calculated from the genome-sequence reads. K-mer frequencies along the sequence depth gradient follow a Poisson distribution in a given data set except for a high proportion at low frequency due to sequencing errors, as K-mers that contain such sequencing errors may be orphans among all splitting K-mers. The genome size, G, was estimated as G = K_num/K_depth, where K_num is the total number of K-mers and K_depth is the maximal frequency. Initial contigs were assembled from filtered 500- and 800-bp insert-size WGA PE libraries using SOAPdenovo. The sequencing reads obtained for 2-k to 40-kb MP libraries were used to connect the contigs and to generate the scaffolds as described by Li et al. (2010) [14] with a K-mer size of 65. Individual BAC pools were assembled independently using SOAPdenovo and the whole genome shotgun reads from PE and MP libraries were used to fill gaps in the BAC scaffolds. After sequencing, the raw reads were filtered as described above. In addition, reads representing contamination by Escherichia coli or the plasmid vector were filtered. The pooled reads were separated according to the BAC-reads index, and each BAC was assembled using a combination of “hierarchical assembly” and “de Bruijn graph assembly.” First, the reads linked to each BAC were assembled using SOAPdenovo [14], with various combinations of parameters with a K-mer range from 27 to 63 and a step size of 6. The assembly with the longest scaffold N50 was defined as the “best” for each BAC. The resulting BACs were mapped with the large shotgun MP read data to optimize the assembly for each BAC. The final draft assembly was produced by integrating sequences that overlapped among the scaffolds independently assembled from genome shotgun and BAC reads, and in doing so eliminated the redundant scaffolds using the following steps. To integrate the two assemblies, the software Rabbit [15] was applied to identify any relationship between scaffolds, to connect the overlapping regions that shared at least 90% similarity, and to remove redundancy based on a 17-mer frequency. Finally, SSPACE [16] was used to construct super-scaffolds containing 800-bp to 40-kb whole genome sequence (WGS) reads, and the 170- to 800-bp genome shotgun read data were used to fill the gaps using GapCloser [14]. Postassembly processing included removal of contaminating bacterial and viral DNA sequences by aligning all assembled sequences to the genome sequences of viruses and bacteria, obtained from previous local BLASTn alignments and by NCBI upload filter. Aligned sequences that shared >90% identity and were >200 bp in size were filtered from the final assembly. The assembled sequences that were covered by at least one expressed sequence tag (EST) sequence were retained. Process read data were mapped to the draft MED/Q genome using SOAPaligner software and read counts were made from .bam files and the average depth was computed from all bases in the window. The relation graph of base pair percentages, and each given sequencing depth along the genome, was obtained. Using genomic DNA from the MED/Q colony, a total of 20 WGS shotgun sequencing libraries was generated (18 pooled male and female PE and MP libraries, and two haploid male-derived WGA PE libraries), from which sequences were generated on an Illumina Hiseq2500 platform. Library sequencing produced a total of 428.2 Gb or an approximate 594.7-fold genome coverage assuming a 0.72-Gbp genome size (based on 17-mer analysis). For the 10 short-insert PE libraries, there were a total of 229.4 Gb (100-bp or 150-bp read length, approximately 318.6-fold genome coverage). Sequencing the eight large-insert (>1 kb) MP libraries produced 80.3 Gb of reads (49 bp read length, 111.5-fold coverage) for use in scaffold construction (Supplemental Table S1). The two male WGA libraries produced a total of 118.5 Gb of data (Supplemental Table S1) or approximately 164.6-fold genome coverage. Sequencing of 13 BAC pools generated 362.6 Gbp of raw data (288.4 Gbp processed data; results not shown). The subsequent assembly of this sequence data using our pipeline (Supplemental Fig. S1) generated a 658-Mbp draft genome assembly for MED/Q consistent with recent flow cytometry estimates [17]. The mean read depth across 10-kb windows indicated that all genome regions were highly represented within the read data, with <1.5% having a depth of <10× (remaining data not shown). Through statistical comparison of genome assembly and annotation between MED/Q and MEAM1/B (Table 1), we found the draft genome of MED/Q consisted of a genome size of 658 Mb with contig N50 size 44 kb, while MEAM1/B assembly was 615 Mb with contig N50 of 30 kb. They have similar G+C content of about 39%, while higher TEs existed in MEAM1/B (44%) than MED/Q (40%). After combining several annotation methods, 20 748 genes were predicted in MED/Q, whereas 15 664 genes in MEAM1/B, and about 80% of both two gene sets were supported by several public functional databases.
Table 1:

Statistics comparison of genome assembly and annotation between MED/Q and MEAM1/B

MED/QaMEAM1/Bb
Sequencing summaryScaffoldcContigcScaffoldcContigc
Total number495429 61819 76152 036
Total length of (bp)658 272 463638 061 971615 029 878599 923 598
Gap number (bp)19 828 575014 380 4910
Average length (bp)132 87721 54331 12311 529
N50 length (bp)436 79144 3663 232 96429 918
N90 length (bp)111 83511 504381 3466117
Maximum length (bp)2 857 362362 83511 178 615269 706
Minimum length (bp)501500500500
GC content (%)39.4639.4639.6439.64
TEs proportion (%)265 Mb (0.40)269 Mb (0.44)
CEGMA evaluation (%)96 100 
BUSCO evaluation7896.8
Gene number20 78615 664
Average gene length (bp)10 06522 762
Average CDS length (bp)19521470
Average exon per gene66
Average exon length (bp)351234
Average intron length (bp)17763125
Annotation gene (%)79.9781
Assemble softwareSOAPdenovoPlatanus

From this study.

From the published MEAM1/B genome [11].

Only contigs and scaffolds ≧500 bp were included in the genome assembly.

Statistics comparison of genome assembly and annotation between MED/Q and MEAM1/B From this study. From the published MEAM1/B genome [11]. Only contigs and scaffolds ≧500 bp were included in the genome assembly.

Annotation of repetitive elements

Repetitive elements were searched for and identified using Repbase [18] implemented in TRF software [19], and a de novo approach implemented in Piler [20]. For the Repbase-based method, two software programs named RepeatMasker [21] and RepeatProteinMask were used to identify repetitive sequences. In the de novo approach, Piler-DF-1.0 [20], RepeatScout-1.0.5 [22], and LTR-FINDER-1.0.5 [23] were used to build de novo repeat libraries from the genome sequences. Finally, the repeated sequences were searched for and classified using the RepeatMasker software. Homology-based annotation of MED/Q repetitive elements was queried against Repbase v.20.05 [18] with RepeatMasker [21]. We found a total of 265.0 Mb TEs, or 40.3% of the MED/Q genome size. This was about 10% higher than the repeat contents of Acyrthosiphon pisum and Rhodnius prolixus, but similar to that of Nilaparvata lugens (39.8%) (Supplemental Table S2). This suggests that long terminal repeat (LTR) (18.5%) are more abundant and contain more nucleotides than all other TE classes. This proliferation of LTR retrotransposons has been found in only one other Hemipteran genome, that of N. lugens (12.29%). The MED/Q genome also contains the high proportion of the DNA-transposon TEs (12.92%) found in other fully described Hemipteran genomes. As with both N. lugens (0.5%) and R. prolixus (0.01%), the MED/Q genome also appears devoid of short interspersed nuclear elements (0.96 %). These other Hemipteran genomes also contain a small amount of long interspersed nuclear elements (A. pisum: 2.6%; MED/Q: 3.18%; R. prolixus: 3.2%), but N. lugens (12.84%). This suggests that MED/Q-specific TEs, especially the LTRs, have evolved relatively recently and contribute to the large number of gene sets.

Annotation of coding regions

Initial evaluation of the gene coverage rate in the draft MED/Q genome assembly was assessed by comparing against 248 core eukaryotic genes obtained using CEGMA 2.4 [24] and Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) [25]. Additionally, 105 067 B. tabaci transcript sequences, ESTs, of >200 bp were used as BLASTn queries against the assembled genome to estimate the representation (cutoff E-value ≥ 10−40). Protein-coding gene de novo predictions using GENEWISE [26] and ab initio gene predictions using GENSCAN [27] and AUGUSTUS [28] were made in combination with 13.7 Gbp of transcriptome (RNA-Seq) data including published MED/Q B. tabaci body, guts, and salivary glands [29-31] and additional, previously unpublished data from females and males [32], to obtain consensus gene sets using GLEAN [33]. For homolog-based prediction, protein sequences from nine species (A. pisum, A. mellifera, D. melanogaster, R. prolixus, Z. nevadensis, A. gambiae, B. mori, P. humanus, and T. castaneum) were aligned with the MED/Q genome scaffolds using TblastN (E-value <1e-5). Target sequences were used to search for accurate gene structures implementing the GeneWise software [26]. For the RNA-Seq datasets, the transcriptome reads were first aligned against the genome using TopHat [33] to identify candidate exon regions. Then, the Cufflinks software [34] was used to assemble the aligned reads into transcripts, and the open reading frames were predicted to obtain reliable transcripts using a Hidden Markov Model-based training parameter. Finally, GLEAN [33] was used to integrate the predicted genes with the de novo, homologous, and RNAseq data to produce the final gene set. The functional annotation of genes was performed using BLASTP alignment to KEGG [35], SwissProt, and TrEMBL [36] databases. Motifs and domains were determined by InterProScan [37] and protein database searches against ProDom, PRINTS, Pfam, SMART, PANTHER, and PROSITE. Preliminary evaluation of transcribed regions within the draft MED/Q genome assembly coverage found that ∼95.2% of B. tabaci ESTs > 200 bp were present, with 90 652 ESTs showing ≥90% length coverage on one scaffold (Supplemental Table S7). This alignment encompassed 92.9% of nucleotides within the EST dataset. Analogously, 229 (96%) of the 248 sequences in the CEGMA gene set and 79% complete and fragmented BUSCOs were present in the MED/Q genome assembly (remaining data not shown). The final GLEAN gene models predicted a reference gene set of 20 786 protein-coding genes, a consensus result derived from de novo, orthology, and evidence (RNA-seq)-based prediction methods (Supplemental Table S3) and integrated into GLEAN gene models (Supplemental Table S4). Among the GLEAN gene models, 16 622 (79.97%) received functional gene annotations using the various databases queried in our analysis pipeline (Supplemental Table S5).

Prediction of gene orthology

Twelve insect species including B. tabaci (Genn.) (Gennadius, 1889) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris, 1776) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), Rhodnius prolixus (Stal, 1859) (Hemiptera: Triatominae), Nilaparvata lugens (Stål, 1854) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae), Pediculus humanus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Phthiraptera: Pediculidae), Apis mellifera (Linnaeus, 1758) (Hymenoptera, Apidae), Nasonia vitripennis (Ashmead, 1904) (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae), Tribolium castaneum (Herbst, 1797) (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae), Anopheles gambiae (Giles, 1902) (Diptera, Culicidae), Drosophila melanogaster (Meigen, 1830) (Diptera, Drosophilidae), Bombyx mori (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera, Bombycidae) and Danaus plexippus (Kluk, 1802) (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae), and two divergent arthropods, Daphnia pulex (Müller, 1785) (O. Cladocera, Daphniidae) and Tetranychus urticae (C. L. Koch, 1836) (O. Arachnida, Tetranychidae), were used to predict orthologs and to reconstruct the phylogenetic tree. Gene families were identified using TreeFam [38,39], and single-copy gene families were assembled to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships. Coding sequences of each single-copy family were concatenated to form one super gene group for each species. All of the nucleotides at codon position 2 of these concatenated genes were extracted to construct the phylogenetic tree by PhyML [40], with a gamma distribution across sites and an HKY85 substitution model. The same set of sequences at codon position 2 was used to estimate divergence times among lineages. The fossil calibrations were set with two previous node data [41,42]. The PAML mcmctree program (v.4.5) [43,44] was used to compute split times using the approximate likelihood calculation algorithm. The software Tracer (v.1.5.0) was utilized to examine the extent of convergence for two independent runs. Phylogenetic analysis based on orthologs across 14 arthropod taxa (Supplemental Table S6) suggested that MED/Q is clustered into a hemipteran clade containing A. pisum and is a sister lineage to a clade containing both R. prolixus and N. lugens (Fig. 1A). The range of species-specific genes within the four hemipteran genomes ranged from 38% to 60%, with higher values for the three phloem-feeding specialists. This led us to investigate interspecific changes in the number and diversity of gene family members (orthologs and paralogs) within this group of Hemiptera (Fig. 1C; Supplemental Fig. S2).
Figure 1:

Phylogenetic relationships and genomic comparisons between Bemisia tabaci and other insect species (A) Phylogenetic relationships of B. tabaci (BEMTA) to insects and other arthropods based on single-copy orthologous genes present in their complete genomes. The following 12 insect species were used for this analysis: Acyrthosiphon pisum (ACYPI), Anopheles gambiae (ANOGA), Apis mellifera (APIME), BEMTA, Bombyx mori (BOMMO), Danaus plexippus (DANPL), Drosophila melanogaster (DROME), Nasonia vitripennis (NASVI), Nilaparvata lugens (NILLU), Pediculus humanus (PEDHU), Rhodnius prolixus (RHOPR), and Tribolium castaneum (TRICA). The two arthropods Daphnia pulex (DAPPU) and Tetranychus urticae (TETUR) were used as outgroup taxa. Branch lengths represent divergence times estimated for the second codon position of 308 single-copy genes, using PhyML with a gamma distribution across sites and a HKY85 substitution model. The branch supports were inferred based on the approximate likelihood ratio test (aLRT). Gene orthology was determined by comparing the genomes of these 14 arthropod species. The use of 1:1:1 refers to single-copy gene orthologs found across all 14 lineages. The use of N:N:N refers to multi-copy gene paralogs found across the 14 lineages. Diptera, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, and Insecta refer to taxon-specific genes present only in the particular lineage. SD indicates species-specific duplicated genes, and ND indicates species-specific unclustered genes. (B) Image of adult MED/Q. (C) A Venn diagram showing the orthologous groups shared among the hemipteran genomes of A. pisum, B. tabaci, N. lugens, and R. prolixus. Our analysis found 3341 gene families common to all four hemipteran genomes, and 2921 common to the genomes of the six vascular (blood and phloem) feeders.

Phylogenetic relationships and genomic comparisons between Bemisia tabaci and other insect species (A) Phylogenetic relationships of B. tabaci (BEMTA) to insects and other arthropods based on single-copy orthologous genes present in their complete genomes. The following 12 insect species were used for this analysis: Acyrthosiphon pisum (ACYPI), Anopheles gambiae (ANOGA), Apis mellifera (APIME), BEMTA, Bombyx mori (BOMMO), Danaus plexippus (DANPL), Drosophila melanogaster (DROME), Nasonia vitripennis (NASVI), Nilaparvata lugens (NILLU), Pediculus humanus (PEDHU), Rhodnius prolixus (RHOPR), and Tribolium castaneum (TRICA). The two arthropods Daphnia pulex (DAPPU) and Tetranychus urticae (TETUR) were used as outgroup taxa. Branch lengths represent divergence times estimated for the second codon position of 308 single-copy genes, using PhyML with a gamma distribution across sites and a HKY85 substitution model. The branch supports were inferred based on the approximate likelihood ratio test (aLRT). Gene orthology was determined by comparing the genomes of these 14 arthropod species. The use of 1:1:1 refers to single-copy gene orthologs found across all 14 lineages. The use of N:N:N refers to multi-copy gene paralogs found across the 14 lineages. Diptera, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, and Insecta refer to taxon-specific genes present only in the particular lineage. SD indicates species-specific duplicated genes, and ND indicates species-specific unclustered genes. (B) Image of adult MED/Q. (C) A Venn diagram showing the orthologous groups shared among the hemipteran genomes of A. pisum, B. tabaci, N. lugens, and R. prolixus. Our analysis found 3341 gene families common to all four hemipteran genomes, and 2921 common to the genomes of the six vascular (blood and phloem) feeders. In summary, we report the first genome sequencing, assembly, and annotation of the MEQ/Q B. tabaci. This genome assembly will provide a valuable resource for studying climatic and host plant adaptations, invasive-invasive and native-exotic interactions, insecticide resistance, vector competence, and its relationships with bacterial endosymbionts.

Availability of supporting data

This whole genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession LIED00000000. The version described in this paper is version LIED01000000 accessible at NCBI. Further data, including annotation files and assembled transcripts, are available in the GigaScience GigaDB repository [32].

Additional files

Figure S1. Schematic illustration of the assembly pipeline for MED/Q genome based on the combined assemblies from WGS and BACs. Table S1. Statistics of the whole genome sequencing data. Table S2. Repeat Masker analysis in four hemiptera species. Table S3. Evidenced use within GLEAN MED/Q protein-coding genes. Table S4. Summary of GLEAN gene models. Table S5. Functional annotation of the MED/Q genome. Table S6. Orthologous gene comparison among genomes of 14 arthropod species. Table S7. Quality control of assembled genome.

Abbreviations

BAC: Bacterial artificial chromosome; BUSCO: Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs; CEGMA: Core Eukaryotic Genes Mapping Approach; EST: Express sequence tag; HMW: high molecular weight; MED/Q: Mediterranean Bemisia tabaci Q; mtCOI: mitochondria cytochrome oxidase I; TEs: transposable elements; WGA: whole-genome amplified; WGS: whole genome shotgun.

Author contributions

YJZ is the leader of the project and the first corresponding author. WX, YJZ, XGZ, YY, JKB, and YL were involved in the project design. XGZ, BYX, JYZ, QG, XCL, XQT, MG, HPP, SXR, and BLQ coordinated the related research works of the MED/Q genome project. DW performed genome assembly. DW performed protein-coding gene annotation. MC and CHC performed gene orthology and phylogenomics. XY performed insecticide targets annotation. YTL performed putative sex determination genes annotation. WX performed putative phloem specialization genes identification. LTG, LXT, YNW, YZ, QJW, SLW, and HYC performed metabolic detoxification systems annotation. ZZY performed immune signaling pathway components annotation. ZZY, JQX, and JQH performed nutrient partitioning between invasive MED/Q and its primary endosymbiont. LTG performed PCR validation. WX, XGZ, DC, JKB, HD, MNM, FG, XPZ, XWW, FHW, YZD, CL, FMY, ELP, and XGJ were involved in writing and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests defined by Giga Science. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Schematic illustration of the assembly pipeline for MED/Q genome based on the combined assemblies from WGS and BACs. Click here for additional data file. Statistics of the whole genome sequencing data. Click here for additional data file. Repeat Masker analysis in four hemiptera species. Click here for additional data file. Evidenced use within GLEAN MED/Q protein-coding genes. Click here for additional data file. Summary of GLEAN gene models. Click here for additional data file. Functional annotation of the MED/Q genome. Click here for additional data file. Orthologous gene comparison among genomes of 14 arthropod species. Click here for additional data file. Quality control of assembled genome. Click here for additional data file.
  40 in total

1.  Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE.

Authors:  Marten Boetzer; Christiaan V Henkel; Hans J Jansen; Derek Butler; Walter Pirovano
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000.

Authors:  A Bairoch; R Apweiler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood.

Authors:  Ziheng Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences.

Authors:  G Benson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Use of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism for identifying subclades of Bemisia tabaci Mediterranean group.

Authors:  Dong Chu; Xiangshun Hu; Changsheng Gao; Huiyan Zhao; Robert L Nichols; Xianchun Li
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  A phylogeographical analysis of the bemisia tabaci species complex based on mitochondrial DNA markers

Authors: 
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood.

Authors:  Z Yang
Journal:  Comput Appl Biosci       Date:  1997-10

8.  Genome sequencing of the sweetpotato whitefly Bemisia tabaci MED/Q.

Authors:  Wen Xie; Chunhai Chen; Zezhong Yang; Litao Guo; Xin Yang; Dan Wang; Ming Chen; Jinqun Huang; Yanan Wen; Yang Zeng; Yating Liu; Jixing Xia; Lixia Tian; Hongying Cui; Qingjun Wu; Shaoli Wang; Baoyun Xu; Xianchun Li; Xinqiu Tan; Murad Ghanim; Baoli Qiu; Huipeng Pan; Dong Chu; Helene Delatte; M N Maruthi; Feng Ge; Xueping Zhou; Xiaowei Wang; Fanghao Wan; Yuzhou Du; Chen Luo; Fengming Yan; Evan L Preisser; Xiaoguo Jiao; Brad S Coates; Jinyang Zhao; Qiang Gao; Jinquan Xia; Ye Yin; Yong Liu; Judith K Brown; Xuguo Joe Zhou; Youjun Zhang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.524

9.  Will the real Bemisia tabaci please stand up?

Authors:  Wee Tek Tay; Gregory A Evans; Laura M Boykin; Paul J De Barro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Developing conversed microsatellite markers and their implications in evolutionary analysis of the Bemisia tabaci complex.

Authors:  Hua-Ling Wang; Jiao Yang; Laura M Boykin; Qiong-Yi Zhao; Yu-Jun Wang; Shu-Sheng Liu; Xiao-Wei Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  33 in total

1.  Genome sequence of the Chinese white wax scale insect Ericerus pela: the first draft genome for the Coccidae family of scale insects.

Authors:  Pu Yang; Shuhui Yu; Junjun Hao; Wei Liu; Zunling Zhao; Zengrong Zhu; Tao Sun; Xueqing Wang; Qisheng Song
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 6.524

2.  Differential Transcriptional Responses in Two Old World Bemisia tabaci Cryptic Species Post Acquisition of Old and New World Begomoviruses.

Authors:  Habibu Mugerwa; Saurabh Gautam; Michael A Catto; Bhabesh Dutta; Judith K Brown; Scott Adkins; Rajagopalbabu Srinivasan
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 7.666

3.  Silencing of the Prophenoloxidase Gene BtPPO1 Increased the Ability of Acquisition and Retention of Tomato chlorosis virus by Bemisia tabaci.

Authors:  Nan Yang; Tianbo Ding; Dong Chu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Pantothenate mediates the coordination of whitefly and symbiont fitness.

Authors:  Fei-Rong Ren; Xiang Sun; Tian-Yu Wang; Jin-Yang Yan; Ya-Lin Yao; Chu-Qiao Li; Jun-Bo Luan
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 11.217

5.  Whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism and mating compatibility studies reveal the presence of distinct species in sub-Saharan Africa Bemisia tabaci whiteflies.

Authors:  Habibu Mugerwa; Hua-Ling Wang; Peter Sseruwagi; Susan Seal; John Colvin
Journal:  Insect Sci       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Genome-wide analyses of the Bemisia tabaci species complex reveal contrasting patterns of admixture and complex demographic histories.

Authors:  S Elfekih; P Etter; W T Tay; M Fumagalli; K Gordon; E Johnson; P De Barro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The invasive MED/Q Bemisia tabaci genome: a tale of gene loss and gene gain.

Authors:  Wen Xie; Xin Yang; Chunhai Chen; Zezhong Yang; Litao Guo; Dan Wang; Jinqun Huang; Hailin Zhang; Yanan Wen; Jinyang Zhao; Qingjun Wu; Shaoli Wang; Brad S Coates; Xuguo Zhou; Youjun Zhang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Genome sequencing of the sweetpotato whitefly Bemisia tabaci MED/Q.

Authors:  Wen Xie; Chunhai Chen; Zezhong Yang; Litao Guo; Xin Yang; Dan Wang; Ming Chen; Jinqun Huang; Yanan Wen; Yang Zeng; Yating Liu; Jixing Xia; Lixia Tian; Hongying Cui; Qingjun Wu; Shaoli Wang; Baoyun Xu; Xianchun Li; Xinqiu Tan; Murad Ghanim; Baoli Qiu; Huipeng Pan; Dong Chu; Helene Delatte; M N Maruthi; Feng Ge; Xueping Zhou; Xiaowei Wang; Fanghao Wan; Yuzhou Du; Chen Luo; Fengming Yan; Evan L Preisser; Xiaoguo Jiao; Brad S Coates; Jinyang Zhao; Qiang Gao; Jinquan Xia; Ye Yin; Yong Liu; Judith K Brown; Xuguo Joe Zhou; Youjun Zhang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.524

9.  Genome-wide analysis of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters in the sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci.

Authors:  Lixia Tian; Tianxue Song; Rongjun He; Yang Zeng; Wen Xie; Qingjun Wu; Shaoli Wang; Xuguo Zhou; Youjun Zhang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 10.  Spotlight on the Roles of Whitefly Effectors in Insect-Plant Interactions.

Authors:  Diana Naalden; Paula J M van Kleeff; Sarmina Dangol; Marieke Mastop; Rebecca Corkill; Saskia A Hogenhout; Merijn R Kant; Robert C Schuurink
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.