Literature DB >> 28327990

Estimating the total number of phosphoproteins and phosphorylation sites in eukaryotic proteomes.

Panayotis Vlastaridis1, Pelagia Kyriakidou1, Anargyros Chaliotis1, Yves Van de Peer2,3,4, Stephen G Oliver5, Grigoris D Amoutzias1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phosphorylation is the most frequent post-translational modification made to proteins and may regulate protein activity as either a molecular digital switch or a rheostat. Despite the cornucopia of high-throughput (HTP) phosphoproteomic data in the last decade, it remains unclear how many proteins are phosphorylated and how many phosphorylation sites (p-sites) can exist in total within a eukaryotic proteome. We present the first reliable estimates of the total number of phosphoproteins and p-sites for four eukaryotes (human, mouse, Arabidopsis, and yeast).
RESULTS: In all, 187 HTP phosphoproteomic datasets were filtered, compiled, and studied along with two low-throughput (LTP) compendia. Estimates of the number of phosphoproteins and p-sites were inferred by two methods: Capture-Recapture, and fitting the saturation curve of cumulative redundant vs. cumulative non-redundant phosphoproteins/p-sites. Estimates were also adjusted for different levels of noise within the individual datasets and other confounding factors. We estimate that in total, 13 000, 11 000, and 3000 phosphoproteins and 230 000, 156 000, and 40 000 p-sites exist in human, mouse, and yeast, respectively, whereas estimates for Arabidopsis were not as reliable.
CONCLUSIONS: Most of the phosphoproteins have been discovered for human, mouse, and yeast, while the dataset for Arabidopsis is still far from complete. The datasets for p-sites are not as close to saturation as those for phosphoproteins. Integration of the LTP data suggests that current HTP phosphoproteomics appears to be capable of capturing 70 % to 95 % of total phosphoproteins, but only 40 % to 60 % of total p-sites.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arabidopsis; Capture-Recapture; Curve-Fitting; Phosphoproteomics; human; mouse; total number of phosphoproteins; total number of phosphorylation sites; yeast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28327990      PMCID: PMC5466708          DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giw015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gigascience        ISSN: 2047-217X            Impact factor:   6.524


  50 in total

1.  The origins of protein phosphorylation.

Authors:  Philip Cohen
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Protein and proteome phosphorylation stoichiometry analysis by element mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Ralf Krüger; Dieter Kübler; Roser Pallissé; Andreas Burkovski; Wolf D Lehmann
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Six alternative proteases for mass spectrometry-based proteomics beyond trypsin.

Authors:  Piero Giansanti; Liana Tsiatsiani; Teck Yew Low; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Correct interpretation of comprehensive phosphorylation dynamics requires normalization by protein expression changes.

Authors:  Ronghu Wu; Noah Dephoure; Wilhelm Haas; Edward L Huttlin; Bo Zhai; Mathew E Sowa; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Consecutive proteolytic digestion in an enzyme reactor increases depth of proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis.

Authors:  Jacek R Wiśniewski; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast.

Authors:  Sina Ghaemmaghami; Won-Ki Huh; Kiowa Bower; Russell W Howson; Archana Belle; Noah Dephoure; Erin K O'Shea; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Evaluation and properties of the budding yeast phosphoproteome.

Authors:  Grigoris D Amoutzias; Ying He; Kathryn S Lilley; Yves Van de Peer; Stephen G Oliver
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 8.  Enrichment techniques employed in phosphoproteomics.

Authors:  Jan Fíla; David Honys
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.520

Review 9.  Physicochemical mechanisms of protein regulation by phosphorylation.

Authors:  Hafumi Nishi; Alexey Shaytan; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 10.  Computational phosphoproteomics: from identification to localization.

Authors:  Dave C H Lee; Andrew R Jones; Simon J Hubbard
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.984

View more
  27 in total

1.  Estimating the total number of phosphoproteins and phosphorylation sites in eukaryotic proteomes.

Authors:  Panayotis Vlastaridis; Pelagia Kyriakidou; Anargyros Chaliotis; Yves Van de Peer; Stephen G Oliver; Grigoris D Amoutzias
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 6.524

Review 2.  The serine/threonine phosphatases of apicomplexan parasites.

Authors:  Chunlin Yang; Gustavo Arrizabalaga
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  EMBER: Multi-label prediction of kinase-substrate phosphorylation events through deep learning.

Authors:  Kathryn E Kirchoff; Shawn M Gomez
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Pex30 undergoes phosphorylation and regulates peroxisome number in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Nayan Moni Deori; Terence Infant; Pradeep Kumar Sundaravadivelu; Rajkumar P Thummer; Shirisha Nagotu
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  A Human Ribonuclease Variant and ERK-Pathway Inhibitors Exhibit Highly Synergistic Toxicity for Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Trish T Hoang; I Caglar Tanrikulu; Quinn A Vatland; Trieu M Hoang; Ronald T Raines
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 6.261

6.  A Genetic Toggle for Chemical Control of Individual Plk1 Substrates.

Authors:  James M Johnson; Alexander S Hebert; Quentin H Drane; Robert F Lera; Jun Wan; Beth A Weaver; Joshua J Coon; Mark E Burkard
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 8.116

Review 7.  Interrogating Protein Phosphatases with Chemical Activity Probes.

Authors:  Garrett R Casey; Cliff I Stains
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.236

8.  Multiple Site-Specific Phosphorylation of IDPs Monitored by NMR.

Authors:  Manon Julien; Chafiaa Bouguechtouli; Ania Alik; Rania Ghouil; Sophie Zinn-Justin; François-Xavier Theillet
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2020

Review 9.  Post-Translational Modifications in Oocyte Maturation and Embryo Development.

Authors:  Yu Wu; Mo Li; Mo Yang
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-02

10.  Automatization and self-maintenance of the O-GlcNAcome catalog: a smart scientific database.

Authors:  Florian Malard; Eugenia Wulff-Fuentes; Rex R Berendt; Guillaume Didier; Stephanie Olivier-Van Stichelen
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.451

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.