| Literature DB >> 28324580 |
Vimal S Prajapati1, Ujjval B Trivedi1, Kamlesh C Patel2.
Abstract
The bacterial strain producing thermostable, alklophilic alpha-amylase was identified as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens KCP2 using 16S rDNA gene sequencing data (NCBI Accession No: KF112071). Medium components were optimized through the statistical approach for the synthesis of alpha-amylase by the organism under solid-state fermentation using wheat bran as the substrate. The medium components influencing the enzyme production were identified using a two-level fractional factorial Plackett-Burman design. Among the various variables screened, starch, ammonium sulphate and calcium chloride were found to be most significant medium components. The optimum levels of these significant parameters were determined employing the response surface Central Composite design which significantly increased the enzyme production with the supplementation of starch 0.01 g, ammonium sulphate 0.2 g and 5 mM calcium chloride in the production medium. Temperature and pH stability of the alpha-amylase suggested its wide application in the food and pharmaceutical industries.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus amyloliquefaciens KCP2; Plackett–Burman design; Response surface methodology; Solid-state fermentation; Thermostable alpha-amylase
Year: 2014 PMID: 28324580 PMCID: PMC4362744 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-014-0213-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Design matrix and experimental results of Plackett–Burman design
| Run no. | Components | Alpha-amylase production (U/gds) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | D1 | D2 | D3 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 9.334 |
| 2 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 0.502 |
| 3 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 3.702 |
| 4 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 12.746 |
| 5 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 16.474 |
| 6 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9.308 |
| 7 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 21.73 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 10.26 |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 5.50 |
| 10 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 19.17 |
| 11 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 27.63 |
| 12 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 39.05 |
D1–D3 represent dummy variables
Full experimental Central Composite design with coded and actual level of variables and the response function
| Run no. | A: starch | B: ammonium sulphate | C: calcium chloride | Alpha-amylase | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual level | Coded level | Actual level | Coded level | Actual level | Coded level | Observed | Predicted | |
| 1 | 0.01 | −1 | 0.01 | −1 | 0.5 | −1 | 49.27 | 48.96 |
| 2 | 0.5 | +1 | 0.01 | −1 | 0.5 | −1 | 46.78 | 46.04 |
| 3 | 0.01 | −1 | 0.2 | +1 | 0.5 | −1 | 48.55 | 48.78 |
| 4 | 0.5 | +1 | 0.2 | +1 | 0.5 | −1 | 42.77 | 41.82 |
| 5 | 0.01 | −1 | 0.01 | −1 | 5 | +1 | 51.08 | 52.78 |
| 6 | 0.5 | +1 | 0.01 | −1 | 5 | +1 | 46.86 | 47.39 |
| 7 | 0.01 | −1 | 0.2 | +1 | 5 | +1 | 60.01 | 61.48 |
| 8 | 0.5 | +1 | 0.2 | +1 | 5 | +1 | 51.21 | 52.06 |
| 9 | −0.15 | −α | 0.105 | 0 | 2.75 | 0 | 54.88 | 53.40 |
| 10 | 0.66 | +α | 0.105 | 0 | 2.75 | 0 | 42.60 | 43.02 |
| 11 | 0.255 | 0 | −0.05 | −α | 2.75 | 0 | 46.95 | 46.60 |
| 12 | 0.255 | 0 | 0.26 | +α | 2.75 | 0 | 51.10 | 50.37 |
| 13 | 0.255 | 0 | 0.105 | 0 | −1.03 | −α | 45.38 | 46.80 |
| 14 | 0.255 | 0 | 0.105 | 0 | 6.53 | +α | 61.10 | 58.62 |
| 15 | 0.255 | 0 | 0.105 | 0 | 2.75 | 0 | 48.59 | 47.94 |
| 16 | 0.255 | 0 | 0.105 | 0 | 2.75 | 0 | 47.07 | 47.94 |
| 17 | 0.255 | 0 | 0.105 | 0 | 2.75 | 0 | 48.93 | 47.94 |
| 18 | 0.255 | 0 | 0.105 | 0 | 2.75 | 0 | 46.10 | 47.94 |
| 19 | 0.255 | 0 | 0.105 | 0 | 2.75 | 0 | 48.42 | 47.94 |
| 20 | 0.255 | 0 | 0.105 | 0 | 2.75 | 0 | 48.34 | 47.94 |
Variables representing medium components used in Plackett–Burman design
| Variables | Medium components | Positive values | Negative values |
|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | Dextrose | 1.5 g | 0.05 g |
| X2 | Starch | 1.5 g | 0.05 g |
| X3 | Lactose | 1.5 g | 0.05 g |
| X4 | Soy bean meal | 1 g | 0.05 g |
| X5 | Yeast extract | 1 g | 0.05 g |
| X6 | Ammonium sulphate | 1 g | 0.05 g |
| X7 | Ammonium nitrate | 1 g | 0.05 g |
| X8 | Calcium chloride | 5 mM | 1 mM |
Experimental range and levels of the independent variables of selected components used for response surface Central Composite design
| Variables | Components | Range | Levels of variable studied | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −α | −1 | 0 | +1 | +α | |||
| X1 | Starch (w/w) | 0.01–0.50 | −0.15 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.66 |
| X2 | Ammonium sulphate (w/w) | 0.01–0.20 | −0.05 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 0.264 |
| X3 | Calcium chloride (mM) | 0.50–5.00 | −1.03 | 0.50 | 2.75 | 5.00 | 6.53 |
Fig. 1Phylogenetic relationship on the basis of homology index for a bacterial isolate B. amyloliquefaciens KCP2
Fig. 2Effect pH on enzyme activity (a) and stability (b)
Fig. 3Effect temperature on enzyme activity (a) and stability (b)
Statistical analysis of components for alpha-amylase production by B. amyloliquefaciens KCP2
| Components | Effect | Standard error |
|
| Confidence (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dextrose | −3.18 | 1.64 | −1.98 | 0.140 | 85.91 |
| Starch | −10.06 | 1.64 | −6.29 | 0.008 | 99.18 |
| Lactose | −4.90 | 1.64 | −3.06 | 0.054 | 94.53 |
| NH4NO3 | −1.93 | 1.64 | −1.21 | 0.312 | 68.77 |
| Yeast extract | 0.238 | 1.64 | 0.148 | 0.891 | 10.88 |
| NH4SO4 | −12.71 | 1.64 | −7.94 | 0.004 | 99.58 |
| CaCl2 | −11.40 | 1.64 | −7.12 | 0.005 | 99.43 |
| Soy bean meal | −1.20 | 1.64 | −0.75 | 0.505 | 49.47 |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for response surface quadratic model of alpha-amylase production from B. amyloliquefaciens KCP2
| Source | Sum of squares |
| Mean square |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 407.6871 | 9 | 45.29857 | 17.97587 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| A-starch | 130.1606 | 1 | 130.1606 | 51.65175 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| B-Ammonium sulphate | 17.12545 | 1 | 17.12545 | 6.795908 | 0.0262 | Significant |
| C-Calcium chloride | 168.6796 | 1 | 168.6796 | 66.93727 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| AB | 8.142854 | 1 | 8.142854 | 3.231337 | 0.1025 | |
| AC | 3.058689 | 1 | 3.058689 | 1.213782 | 0.2964 | |
| BC | 39.48642 | 1 | 39.48642 | 15.66943 | 0.0027 | Significant |
| A2 | 0.12979 | 1 | 0.12979 | 0.051505 | 0.8250 | |
| B2 | 0.54180 | 1 | 0.5418 | 0.215003 | 0.6528 | |
| C2 | 40.94109 | 1 | 40.94109 | 16.24669 | 0.0024 | Significant |
| Residual | 25.19965 | 10 | 2.519965 | |||
| Lack of fit | 19.24826 | 5 | 3.849652 | 3.23425 | 0.1118 | Not significant |
| Pure error | 5.951384 | 5 | 1.190277 | |||
| Core total | 432.8868 | 19 |
CV 3.22 %, adequate precision 17.51
Fig. 4Response surface graph showing interaction effects between concentration of starch and ammonium sulphate (a), starch and calcium chloride (b), and ammonium sulphate and calcium chloride (c)