| Literature DB >> 28324576 |
Suki Roy1, Shreta Chandni1, Ishita Das1, Loganathan Karthik1,2, Gaurav Kumar1, Kokati Venkata Bhaskara Rao3.
Abstract
The present study was focused on isolation, screening, characterization and application of biosurfactant producing marine actinobacteria. Twenty actinobacteria were isolated from marine water sample and were primarily screened for biosurfactant production using hemolytic activity method. Among the 20 isolates, six showed positive result for hemolytic activity and those were taken for further secondary screening tests such as oil collapse method, oil spreading method and emulsification method. From the results of secondary screening analysis, two isolates (SIS-3 and SIS-20) were selected and further used to carry out biosurfactant characterization test such as pH, density, surface tension and viscosity determination. Comparing biosurfactant characterization results, SIS-3 was chosen for further analysis and application. FT-IR and GC-MS were carried out for analysis of biosurfactant from isolate SIS-3 and the compound detected was rhamnolipid. The isolate (SIS-3) was identified as Nocardiopsis using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and named as 'Nocardiopsis VITSISB' (KC958579) which was further applied for immobilizing whole cells for engine oil degradation by constructing an aquatic model and using natural products such as soybean meal, sugarcane juice as nutrient source. The oil was efficiently degraded by rhamnolipid producing Nocardiopsis VITSISB (KC958579) within 25 days which indicated that the strain can act as a natural candidate for the bioremediation of oil spill in ocean.Entities:
Keywords: Actinobacteria; Bioremediation; Biosurfactant; Rhamnolipid
Year: 2014 PMID: 28324576 PMCID: PMC4362736 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-014-0199-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Haemolysis assay of 20 isolates of marine actinobacteria
| Isolate name | Haemolysis activity | Size of zone of clearance (mm) |
|---|---|---|
| SIS-1 | α | 9 ± 0.5 |
| SIS-2 | β | 18 ± 0.3 |
| SIS-3 | β | 15 ± 0.5 |
| SIS-4 | α | 8 ± 0.6 |
| SIS-5 | α | 6 ± 0.6 |
| SIS-6 | α | 5 ± 0.3 |
| SIS-7 | β | 5 ± 0.6 |
| SIS-8 | α | 6 ± 0.5 |
| SIS-9 | γ | |
| SIS-10 | γ | |
| SIS-11 | β | 17 ± 0.6 |
| SIS-12 | α | 3 ± 0.5 |
| SIS-13 | γ | - |
| SIS-14 | α | 16 ± 0.6 |
| SIS-15 | α | 7 ± 0.5 |
| SIS-16 | α | 4 ± 0.5 |
| SIS-17 | γ | - |
| SIS-18 | β | 16 ± 0.3 |
| SIS-19 | α | 10 ± 0.2 |
| SIS-20 | α | 13 ± 0.4 |
Fig. 1Emulsification index (E24) of the isolates in two media. Data are given as mean ± SD (n = 3). Results were considered significant at p < 0.05
Secondary screening of biosurfactant produced by 6 isolates
| Isolate name | Oil collapse method | Oil spread method Size of zone (mm) | Emulsification index (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIS-2 | +a | 62 ± 0.2 | 32 ± 0.4 |
| SIS-3 | + | 74 ± 0.5 | 44 ± 0.2 |
| SIS-11 | -c | 64 ± 0.3 | 35 ± 0.3 |
| SIS-14 | + | 75 ± 0.2 | 35 ± 0.1 |
| SIS-18 | + | 52 ± 0.4 | 22 ± 0.2 |
SIS-20 SLS | ++b ++ | 68 ± 0.3 83 ± 0.1 | 36 ± 0.2 82 ± 0.1 |
a Partial spreading on the oil surface
b Complete spreading on the oil surface
c Lack of biosurfactant production
Characterization of biosurfactant produces by two strain SIS-20 and SIS-3
| Properties | SIS-20 | SIS-3 | SLS a | H2O |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 6.95 | 7.24 | 7.13 | 7.0 |
| Density (g/cm3) | 1.18 | 1.16 | 1.01 | 1 |
| Surface tension (dyne/cm) | 69.808 | 62.524 | 59.393 | 68.6 |
| Viscosity (poise) | 12.6×10–3 | 10.7×10–3 | 10.1×10–3 | 9.1×10–3 |
a Sodium Lauryl Sulphate
Fig. 2Temperature stability of biosurfactant produced by SIS-3: a emulsification index, b surface tension. Data are given as mean ± SD (n = 3). Data are significant where p < 0.05
Fig. 3pH stability of biosurfactant produced by SIS-3: a emulsification index, b surface tension. Data are given as mean ± SD (n = 3). Results were considered significant at p < 0.05
Fig. 4Salinity stability of biosurfactant produced by SIS-3: a emulsification index, b surface tension. Data are given as mean ± SD (n = 3). Results were considered significant at p < 0.05
Fig. 5FT-IR spectra of biosurfactant produced by SIS-3
Fig. 6GC–MS profile of chloroform:methanol extract of SIS-3
Fig. 7Phylogenetic tree of Nocardiopsis VITSISB (KC958579)
Fig. 8Aquatic Model a day 1 and b day 25
Fig. 9HPLC profile of engine oil: a before degradation, b after degradation (25 days)