Anne G Ciriello1, Zoelle B Dizon1, Tessie W October1,2. 1. 1 Division of Critical Care Medicine, Children's National Health Systems, Washington, DC, USA. 2. 2 Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Family conferences in the pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) often include palliative care (PC) providers. We do not know how ICU communication differs when the PC team is present. AIM: To compare language used by PC team and ICU physicians during family conferences. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort review of ICU family conferences with and without the PC team. SETTING: Forty-four bed pediatric ICU in a tertiary medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Nine ICU physicians and 4 PC providers who participated in 18 audio-recorded family conferences. RESULTS: Of the 9 transcripts without the PC team, we identified 526 ICU physician statements, generating 10 thematic categories. The most common themes were giving medical information and discussing medical options. Themes unique to ICU physicians included statements of hopelessness, insensitivity, and "health-care provider challenges." Among the 9 transcripts with the PC team, there were 280 statements, generating 10 thematic categories. Most commonly, the PC team offered statements of support, giving medical information, and quality of life. Both teams promoted family engagement by soliciting questions; however, the PC team was more likely to use open-ended questions, offer support, and discuss quality of life. CONCLUSION: Pediatric ICU physicians spend more time giving medical information, whereas the PC team more commonly offers emotional support. The addition of the PC team to ICU family conferences may provide a balanced approach to communication.
BACKGROUND: Family conferences in the pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) often include palliative care (PC) providers. We do not know how ICU communication differs when the PC team is present. AIM: To compare language used by PC team and ICU physicians during family conferences. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort review of ICU family conferences with and without the PC team. SETTING: Forty-four bed pediatric ICU in a tertiary medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Nine ICU physicians and 4 PC providers who participated in 18 audio-recorded family conferences. RESULTS: Of the 9 transcripts without the PC team, we identified 526 ICU physician statements, generating 10 thematic categories. The most common themes were giving medical information and discussing medical options. Themes unique to ICU physicians included statements of hopelessness, insensitivity, and "health-care provider challenges." Among the 9 transcripts with the PC team, there were 280 statements, generating 10 thematic categories. Most commonly, the PC team offered statements of support, giving medical information, and quality of life. Both teams promoted family engagement by soliciting questions; however, the PC team was more likely to use open-ended questions, offer support, and discuss quality of life. CONCLUSION: Pediatric ICU physicians spend more time giving medical information, whereas the PC team more commonly offers emotional support. The addition of the PC team to ICU family conferences may provide a balanced approach to communication.
Entities:
Keywords:
child; critical illness; decision-making; health communication; palliative medicine; qualitative; social support
Authors: Paul S Richman; Howard L Saft; Catherine R Messina; Andrew R Berman; Paul A Selecky; Richard A Mularski; Daniel E Ray; Dee W Ford Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Renee D Stapleton; Ruth A Engelberg; Marjorie D Wenrich; Christopher H Goss; J Randall Curtis Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Renee Boss; Judith Nelson; David Weissman; Margaret Campbell; Randall Curtis; Jennifer Frontera; Michelle Gabriel; Dana Lustbader; Anne Mosenthal; Colleen Mulkerin; Kathleen Puntillo; Daniel Ray; Rick Bassett; Karen Brasel; Ross Hays Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: David A Turner; Richard B Mink; K Jane Lee; Margaret K Winkler; Sara L Ross; Christoph P Hornik; Jennifer J Schuette; Katherine Mason; Stephanie A Storgion; Denise M Goodman Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Cynthia Gordon; Ellen Barton; Kathleen L Meert; Susan Eggly; Murray Pollacks; Jerry Zimmerman; K J S Anand; Joseph Carcillo; Christopher J L Newth; J Michael Dean; Douglas F Willson; Carol Nicholson Journal: Commun Med Date: 2009
Authors: Amber S Spijkers; Aranka Akkermans; Ellen M A Smets; Marcus J Schultz; Thomas G V Cherpanath; Job B M van Woensel; Marc van Heerde; Anton H van Kaam; Moniek van de Loo; Dick L Willems; Mirjam A de Vos Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 41.787
Authors: Claudia Delgado-Corcoran; Erin E Bennett; Stephanie A Bodily; Sarah E Wawrzynski; Danielle Green; Dominic Moore; Lawrence J Cook; Lenora M Olson Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 1.023