Literature DB >> 28320714

Variability in Trough Total and Unbound Teicoplanin Concentrations and Achievement of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Targets in Adult Patients with Hematological Malignancy.

Catherine J Byrne1, Jason A Roberts2,3, Brett McWhinney4, Jerome P Fennell5, Philomena O'Byrne5, Evelyn Deasy5, Sean Egan5, Ronan Desmond5, Helen Enright5, Sheila A Ryder6, Deirdre M D'Arcy1, Johnny McHugh5.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore the following aspects of teicoplanin use in patients with hematological malignancy: early attainment of target trough concentrations with current high-dose teicoplanin regimens, variability in unbound teicoplanin fractions, factors associated with observed total and unbound trough concentrations, efficacy and toxicity, and renal function estimation. This was a single-center, prospective study. Samples for determination of trough concentrations were taken on days 3, 4, 7, and 10. Total and unbound teicoplanin concentrations were determined using validated high-performance liquid chromatography methods. Regression analyses were used to identify the factors associated with the trough concentration. Thirty teicoplanin-treated adults with hematological malignancy were recruited. Despite the use of dosages higher than the conventional dosages, the proportions of patients with a trough concentration of ≥20 mg/liter at 48 h and at 72 h were 16.7% and 37.9%, respectively. Renal function was significantly negatively associated with total trough concentrations at 48 h and 72 h (P < 0.05). For an average hematological malignancy patient (creatinine clearance = 70 ml/min), sequential loading doses of at least 12 mg/kg of body weight may be needed to achieve early adequate exposure. In the absence of measured creatinine clearance, estimates obtained using the Cockcroft-Gault (total body weight) equation could prove to be an acceptable surrogate. The unbound fractions of teicoplanin were highly variable (3.4 to 18.8%). Higher unbound fractions were observed in patients with low serum albumin concentrations. Teicoplanin was well tolerated. Teicoplanin loading doses higher than those in current use appear to be necessary. Increased dosing is needed in patients with increased renal function. The high variability in protein binding supports the contention for therapeutic drug monitoring of unbound teicoplanin concentrations. (This study has been registered with EudraCT under registration no. 2013-004535-72.).
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hematological malignancy; pharmacokinetics; protein binding; teicoplanin; therapeutic drug monitoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28320714      PMCID: PMC5444128          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02466-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  30 in total

Review 1.  Multicomponent antibiotic substances produced by fermentation: implications for regulatory authorities, critically ill patients and generics.

Authors:  Adrian J Brink; Guy A Richards; Gaia Colombo; Fabrizio Bortolotti; Paolo Colombo; François Jehl
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 2.  Significance of protein binding in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Stephan Schmidt; Daniel Gonzalez; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.534

3.  Simplified dosing regimens of teicoplanin for patient groups stratified by renal function and weight using Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Takaaki Yamada; Toshiharu Nonaka; Takahisa Yano; Toshio Kubota; Nobuaki Egashira; Takehiro Kawashiri; Ryozo Oishi
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 5.283

4.  Simplified calculation of body-surface area.

Authors:  R D Mosteller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-10-22       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients: a review of pathophysiological conditions responsible for altered disposition and pharmacokinetic variability.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index: A multinational scoring system for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients.

Authors:  J Klastersky; M Paesmans; E B Rubenstein; M Boyer; L Elting; R Feld; J Gallagher; J Herrstedt; B Rapoport; K Rolston; J Talcott
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Characterization of vancomycin pharmacokinetics in the adult acute myeloid leukemia population.

Authors:  Anthony Jarkowski; Alan Forrest; Richard P Sweeney; Wei Tan; Brahm H Segal; Nikolaos Almyroudis; Eunice S Wang; Meir Wetzler
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 1.809

8.  Estimation of creatinine clearance in patients with unstable renal function, without a urine specimen.

Authors:  Roger Jelliffe
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.754

9.  Teicoplanin in patients with acute leukaemia and febrile neutropenia: a special population benefiting from higher dosages.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Anna Candoni; Federica Pavan; Leonardo Pagani; Daniela Damiani; Marco Casini; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Teicoplanin use in adult patients with haematological malignancy: Exploring relationships between dose, trough concentrations, efficacy and nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  Catherine J Byrne; Sean Egan; Jérôme P Fennell; Philomena O'Byrne; Helen Enright; Evelyn Deasy; Sheila A Ryder; Deirdre M D'Arcy; Johnny McHugh
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 5.283

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluating the optimal dose of teicoplanin with therapeutic drug monitoring: not too high for adverse event, not too low for treatment efficacy.

Authors:  Si-Ho Kim; Cheol-In Kang; Kyungmin Huh; Sun Young Cho; Doo Ryeon Chung; Soo-Youn Lee; Yae-Jean Kim; Kyong Ran Peck
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Clinical practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of teicoplanin: a consensus review by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Authors:  Yuki Hanai; Yoshiko Takahashi; Takashi Niwa; Toshihiko Mayumi; Yukihiro Hamada; Toshimi Kimura; Kazuaki Matsumoto; Satoshi Fujii; Yoshio Takesue
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 3.  Antimicrobial therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill adult patients: a Position Paper.

Authors:  Mohd H Abdul-Aziz; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar; Matteo Bassetti; Hendrik Bracht; George Dimopoulos; Deborah Marriott; Michael N Neely; Jose-Artur Paiva; Federico Pea; Fredrik Sjovall; Jean F Timsit; Andrew A Udy; Sebastian G Wicha; Markus Zeitlinger; Jan J De Waele; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Clinical efficacy and safety in patients treated with teicoplanin with a target trough concentration of 20 μg/mL using a regimen of 12 mg/kg for five doses within the initial 3 days.

Authors:  Takashi Ueda; Yoshio Takesue; Kazuhiko Nakajima; Kaoru Ichiki; Kaori Ishikawa; Yoshiko Takai; Kumiko Yamada; Toshie Tsuchida; Naruhito Otani; Yoshiko Takahashi; Mika Ishihara; Shingo Takubo; Hiroki Ikeuchi; Motoi Uchino; Takeshi Kimura
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.483

5.  Therapeutic Drug Level Monitoring of Teicoplanin in Korean Pediatric Patients with Normal versus Impaired Renal Function.

Authors:  Joon Sik Choi; Jong Min Kim; Dongsub Kim; Si Ho Kim; Heeyeon Cho; Hyung Doo Park; Soo Youn Lee; Cheol In Kang; Yae Jean Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Vancomycin-related convulsion in a pediatric patient with neuroblastoma: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Qiao-Feng Ye; Guang-Fei Wang; Yi-Xue Wang; Guo-Ping Lu; Zhi-Ping Li
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  Retrospective analysis of relationships among the dose regimen, trough concentration, efficacy, and safety of teicoplanin in Chinese patients with moderate-severe Gram-positive infections.

Authors:  Lijuan Zhou; Long Cheng; Yanqiu Gao; Wei Cao; Jia Liu; Hongya Guan; Hua Zhang; Yun Shi; Wenying Lv
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.