Literature DB >> 26228465

Teicoplanin use in adult patients with haematological malignancy: Exploring relationships between dose, trough concentrations, efficacy and nephrotoxicity.

Catherine J Byrne1, Sean Egan2, Jérôme P Fennell3, Philomena O'Byrne2, Helen Enright4, Evelyn Deasy2, Sheila A Ryder1, Deirdre M D'Arcy5, Johnny McHugh4.   

Abstract

In 2010, our hospital introduced a higher target teicoplanin trough concentration of ≥20 mg/L by Day 3 for haematological malignancy patients. This study aimed to explore whether target trough concentrations were achieved, to identify factors associated with trough concentrations attained, and to assess clinical efficacy with teicoplanin treatments and nephrotoxicity. This was a retrospective, single-centre, cohort study of 172 teicoplanin treatments in 104 adults with haematological malignancy. Mixed-effects regression was used to evaluate factors affecting trough concentrations, and logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between trough concentrations and treatment outcomes. Nephrotoxicity was assessed using the RIFLE criteria. Considerable variability in trough concentrations was observed, with trough concentrations ≥20 mg/L rarely achieved early in therapy. A mixed-effects regression model explaining 52% of the variation in trough concentrations was developed. Dose and day of therapy were positively associated with trough concentration, whilst estimated renal function and, interestingly, acute myeloid leukaemia diagnosis were negatively associated (P<0.05). Results suggested a positive relationship between trough concentration and the likelihood of a favourable outcome for coagulase-negative staphylococcal central line-associated bloodstream infections. Elucidation of a specific target concentration requires further investigation. Teicoplanin was well tolerated renally. Findings suggest a risk of underexposure if conventional teicoplanin doses are used in haematological malignancy patients. Given the variability in trough concentrations observed, the identified factors affecting trough concentrations attained and the suggested link with clinical outcome, individualised initial dosing followed by therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to ensure early adequate exposure in this vulnerable patient group.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Haematological malignancy; Nephrotoxicity; Pharmacokinetics; Teicoplanin; Therapeutic drug monitoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26228465     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  9 in total

1.  Variability in Trough Total and Unbound Teicoplanin Concentrations and Achievement of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Targets in Adult Patients with Hematological Malignancy.

Authors:  Catherine J Byrne; Jason A Roberts; Brett McWhinney; Jerome P Fennell; Philomena O'Byrne; Evelyn Deasy; Sean Egan; Ronan Desmond; Helen Enright; Sheila A Ryder; Deirdre M D'Arcy; Johnny McHugh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Nephrotoxicity of Teicoplanin Therapy in Chinese Children: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Dan Sun; Tao Zhang; Jie Mi; Yuzhu Dong; Yang Liu; Ying Zhang; Di Zhang; Taotao Wang; Hua Cheng; Yalin Dong
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 3.  Are Antibiotics Appropriately Dosed in Critically Ill Patients with Augmented Renal Clearance? A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Mohammad Sistanizad; Rezvan Hassanpour; Elham Pourheidar
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.149

4.  Evaluating the optimal dose of teicoplanin with therapeutic drug monitoring: not too high for adverse event, not too low for treatment efficacy.

Authors:  Si-Ho Kim; Cheol-In Kang; Kyungmin Huh; Sun Young Cho; Doo Ryeon Chung; Soo-Youn Lee; Yae-Jean Kim; Kyong Ran Peck
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Clinical practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of teicoplanin: a consensus review by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Authors:  Yuki Hanai; Yoshiko Takahashi; Takashi Niwa; Toshihiko Mayumi; Yukihiro Hamada; Toshimi Kimura; Kazuaki Matsumoto; Satoshi Fujii; Yoshio Takesue
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Clinical efficacy and safety in patients treated with teicoplanin with a target trough concentration of 20 μg/mL using a regimen of 12 mg/kg for five doses within the initial 3 days.

Authors:  Takashi Ueda; Yoshio Takesue; Kazuhiko Nakajima; Kaoru Ichiki; Kaori Ishikawa; Yoshiko Takai; Kumiko Yamada; Toshie Tsuchida; Naruhito Otani; Yoshiko Takahashi; Mika Ishihara; Shingo Takubo; Hiroki Ikeuchi; Motoi Uchino; Takeshi Kimura
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.483

7.  Retrospective analysis of relationships among the dose regimen, trough concentration, efficacy, and safety of teicoplanin in Chinese patients with moderate-severe Gram-positive infections.

Authors:  Lijuan Zhou; Long Cheng; Yanqiu Gao; Wei Cao; Jia Liu; Hongya Guan; Hua Zhang; Yun Shi; Wenying Lv
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Tools for the Individualized Therapy of Teicoplanin for Neonates and Children.

Authors:  V Ramos-Martín; M N Neely; K Padmore; M Peak; M W Beresford; M A Turner; S Paulus; J López-Herce; W W Hope
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Pharmacodynamic comparison of different antimicrobial regimens against Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections with elevated vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration.

Authors:  Thaina Miranda da Costa; Gabriel Trova Cuba; Priscylla Guimarães Migueres Morgado; David P Nicolau; Simone Aranha Nouér; Kátia Regina Netto Dos Santos; Carlos Roberto Veiga Kiffer
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.090

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.