Nitric oxide (NO) has many important physiological functions, including its ability to inhibit platelet activation and serve as potent antimicrobial agent. The multiple roles of NO in vivo have led to great interest in the development of biomaterials that can deliver NO for specific biomedical applications. Herein, we report a simple solvent impregnation technique to incorporate a nontoxic NO donor, S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP), into a more biocompatible biomedical grade polymer, CarboSil 20 80A. The resulting polymer-crystal composite material yields a very stable, long-term NO release biomaterial. The SNAP impregnation process is carefully characterized and optimized, and it is shown that SNAP crystal formation occurs in the bulk of the polymer after solvent evaporation. LC-MS results demonstrate that more than 70% of NO release from this new composite material originates from the SNAP embedded CarboSil phase, and not from the SNAP species leaching out into the soaking solution. Catheters prepared with CarboSil and then impregnated with 15 wt % SNAP provide a controlled NO release over a 14 d period at physiologically relevant fluxes and are shown to significantly reduce long-term (14 day) bacterial biofilm formation against Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudonomas aeruginosa in a CDC bioreactor model. After 7 h of catheter implantation in the jugular veins of rabbit, the SNAP CarboSil catheters exhibit a 96% reduction in thrombus area (0.03 ± 0.01 cm2/catheter) compared to the controls (0.84 ± 0.19 cm2/catheter) (n = 3). These results suggest that SNAP impregnated CarboSil can become an attractive new biomaterial for use in preparing intravascular catheters and other implanted medical devices.
Nitric oxide (NO) has many important physiological functions, including its ability to inhibit platelet activation and serve as potent antimicrobial agent. The multiple roles of NO in vivo have led to great interest in the development of biomaterials that can deliver NO for specific biomedical applications. Herein, we report a simple solvent impregnation technique to incorporate a nontoxic NO donor, S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP), into a more biocompatible biomedical grade polymer, CarboSil 20 80A. The resulting polymer-crystal composite material yields a very stable, long-term NO release biomaterial. The SNAP impregnation process is carefully characterized and optimized, and it is shown that SNAP crystal formation occurs in the bulk of the polymer after solvent evaporation. LC-MS results demonstrate that more than 70% of NO release from this new composite material originates from the SNAP embedded CarboSil phase, and not from the SNAP species leaching out into the soaking solution. Catheters prepared with CarboSil and then impregnated with 15 wt % SNAP provide a controlled NO release over a 14 d period at physiologically relevant fluxes and are shown to significantly reduce long-term (14 day) bacterial biofilm formation against Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudonomas aeruginosa in a CDC bioreactor model. After 7 h of catheter implantation in the jugular veins of rabbit, the SNAPCarboSil catheters exhibit a 96% reduction in thrombus area (0.03 ± 0.01 cm2/catheter) compared to the controls (0.84 ± 0.19 cm2/catheter) (n = 3). These results suggest that SNAP impregnated CarboSil can become an attractive new biomaterial for use in preparing intravascular catheters and other implanted medical devices.
Intravascular (IV) catheters
are indispensable in modern-day medical
practice, especially within hospital intensive care units.[1,2] They provide the necessary vascular access that allows doctors to
withdraw blood samples, monitor patients, and administer medicine
in a simple fashion; however, their frequent and prolonged use increase
patients’ risk for complications such as thrombosis and local
or systemic infections.[3] Catheter-related
thrombosis (CRT) is a common complication in patients with long-term
indwelling catheters,[4] and it becomes symptomatic
in about 5% of the patients.[5] Device-initiated
thrombus formation can lead to thrombi detachment from the device
surface that can travel through the vasculature and cause life-threatening
obstructions such as pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, stroke
or heart attack.[2,5,6] Use
of systemic anticoagulants to prevent CRT is common, but not always
effective,[5] and can increase the risk of
causing hemorrhage[7,8] and/or inducing thrombocytopenia.[7]Another major complication associated with
IV catheter placement
is infection.[1,9−11] Bacterial biofilm,
commonly formed on surfaces by microbes sticking to each other, are
surrounded and protected by a self-produced extracellular polymeric
matrix. The presence of biofilm is one of the main causes of catheter-related
bloodstream infections (CRBSIs).[3,11,12] Bacterial cells within biofilm are significantly more resistant
to antibiotics as well as the patient’s innate immune defense
system than planktonic phase microbes, and the minimal concentration
of antibiotics for eradication of mature biofilm is typically 10–1000
times higher than for the planktonic cells.[13,14] CRBSIs are the most common cause of nosocomial bacteremia,[10] and each year 150 million IV catheters are implanted
in the United States,[15,16] and 250 000 CRBSIs occur
annually because of their use.[9,16,17] As a result, it has been reported that CRBSIs dramatically increase
the length of hospital stays,[18] mortality
rates,[19] and overall treatment cost[9,20] per episode.Many strategies have been suggested in the past
to prevent thrombosis
and infections from occurring on IV catheters, such as using a catheter
lock solution that contains anticoagulant (e.g., heparin) and/or high
concentration of antimicrobial agents (e.g., antibiotics).[7,21] Although there has been some success in clinical trials using these
methods,[21] others have reported no significant
differences in thrombosis reduction when using a heparin lock solution
vs saline solution.[7,22,23] And for most of the studies evaluating antimicrobial lock solutions,
the treatment was only evaluated based on negative blood sample cultures,
not the presence or absence of biofilm on the catheter itself, a much
more specific infection risk indicator.[11] Moreover, there are many concerns emerging from the potential toxicity
to the patient resulting from the diffusion or inadvertent flushing
of the lock solution into blood circulation,[11,24] as well as the development of antimicrobial resistance.[11,25]Nitric oxide (NO) is synthesized in the human body from the
substrate l-arginine[26] and participates
in
a variety of physiological processes, including vasodilation, blood
pressure regulation, inhibiting platelet activation, maintaining hemostasis
in the vasculature, immune response, and wound healing.[27−30] Nitric oxide can prevent activation of platelets, a key step in
the coagulation cascade that ultimately leads to thrombus formation.[29,31] Nitric oxide has also been shown to exhibit broad-spectrum antibacterial
activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).[27,32] NO serves as a bactericidal agent at high levels (200 ppm of gaseous
NO),[33−35] but low levels of NO (picomolar to nanomolar range
in solution phase) are also a key signaling molecule and mediator
in bacterial quorum sensing to minimize bacterial adhesion and disperse
biofilm formation.[36,37] Various S-nitrosothiols
(RSNOs) are leading candidates as NO donors for incorporation into
biomaterials for controlled NO delivery, because of their relatively
high stability and ability to release NO under physiological conditions.[38−40]S-Nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine
(SNAP) is a particularly attractive RSNO species for creating NO releasing
biomedical devices because of its low cost, safety (e.g., penicillamine
is an FDA-approved drug[41]), and potential
for long-term NO release applications when it is incorporated into
biomedical polymers with very low water uptake.[42,43]Recently, our lab has developed a very simple impregnation
procedure
in which SNAP can be impregnated into commercial silicone rubber Foley
urinary catheters to achieve long-term NO release capabilities (>30
days).[44] In this previous work, Colletta
et al. obtained 5.43 wt % of SNAP-within the silicone Foley catheter
by impregnating the tubing for 24 h in a 125 mg/mL SNAP solution prepared
in THF. The antimicrobial efficiency of the NO releasing Foley catheters
was demonstrated toward several strains of bacteria associated with
catheter associated urinary tract infections. In follow-up work, Brisbois
et al. reported the impregnation of commercial Tygon formula 3350
silicone tubing using 25 mg/mL of SNAP in THF for 24 h and then used
the tubing for preparing extracorporeal circuits (ECC). These NO releasing
ECC loops exhibited improved blood compatibility over corresponding
controls without NO release in a 4 h rabbit thrombogenicity model.[45]It is well-known that molecular interactions
between polymer surfaces
and protein molecules determine the biocompatibility of a polymer[46] and the innate hemocompatibility of the polymer
that contacts blood can greatly influence its ultimate efficacy in
preventing thrombus formation.[47] Indeed,
Handa et al. evaluated the intrinsic hemocompatibility of four different
biomedical grade polymers in vivo and the results demonstrated that
polyurethane copolymers (such as Elast-eon E2As, a block copolymer
of polyurethane and poly(dimethylsiloxane) have enhanced inherent
hemocompatibility compared to the other polymers, including polyurethanes
(e.g., Tecoflex SG-80A) and poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC).[47] CarboSil 20 80A, similar to Elast-eon E2As,
is a triblock copolymer of polyurethane, poly(dimethylsiloxane) and
polycarbonate, synthesized from hard segments 4,4′-methylene
bisphenyl diisocyanate with glycol chain extender and soft segments
of aliphatic polycarbonate and poly(dimethylsiloxane).[46] Studies have shown that there is a strong interaction
between fibrinogen and the CarboSil polymer surface that results in
very few conformational changes of the adsorbed fibrinogen, which
is an important step in preventing the coagulation cascade and thrombus
formation initiated by protein adsorption.[27] Therefore, CarboSil is a very attractive material for preparing
IV catheters owing to its enhanced innate hemocompatibility.[43,46] IV catheters or other biomedical devices made with NO releasing
CarboSil should have more enhanced efficacy in reducing platelet activation
and thrombus formation than CarboSil alone. Of note, the impregnation
method described earlier[44,45] was developed for silicone
rubber and THF is a good solvent for silicone because it can swell
the tubing to ca. 1.3 times its original size.[45] However, the compatibility between various solvents and
polymers are quite different in different scenarios.[48] For example, since THF is known to be able to dissolve,
instead of swell, CarboSil polymer,[43] different
solvents need to be selected in order to adapt this methodology to
CarboSil. Moreover, many other aspects of the previously reported
impregnation process (e.g., the SNAP concentration, impregnation time,
etc.) need to be optimized to achieve the best efficiency for SNAP
impregnation into CarboSil. Herein, we report our effort to modify
the SNAP impregnation method to transform premade dip-coated CarboSil
20 80A IV catheters into NO releasing catheters. The optimized SNAP
impregnation process and material characterization (including solid-state
analysis of the SNAP within the CarboSil polymer) are described in
detail. The resulting catheters are further evaluated for their antimicrobial
efficacies in vitro against Staphylococcus epidermidis(16,49,50) and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa,[10] two bacteria that
are commonly reported to cause CRBSIs. In addition, the IV CarboSil
catheters are also evaluated within the jugular veins of rabbits to
examine their effectiveness at preventing thrombus formation.
Experimental Section
Materials
N-Acetyl-D-penicillamine
(NAP), sodium nitrite, l-cysteine, sodium chloride, potassium
chloride, sodium phosphate dibasic, potassium phosphate monobasic,
copper(II) chloride, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), tetrahydrofuran
(THF) and N,N-dimethylacetamide
(DMAc) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). N-Acetyl-d,l-penicillamine disulfide (NAPdisulfide) was obtained from Enzo Life Science, Inc. (New York, NY).
Methanol (MeOH), methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), hydrochloric acid, sulfuric
acid, Luria–Bertani (LB) broth and LB agar were products of
Fisher Scientific (Hampton, NH). CarboSil 20 80A was obtained from
DSM Biomedical Inc. (Berkeley, CA). An Agilent ZORBAX rapid resolution
high definition (RRHD) Eclipse Plus C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm,
1.8 μm particle size) was purchased from Altmann Analytik GmbH
& Co.KG (Munich, Germany). All aqueous solutions were prepared
with 18.2 MΩ-deionized water using a Milli-Q filter from EMD
Millipore (Billerica, MA). Phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4,
containing 138 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM sodium phosphate, and 100
μM EDTA was used for all in vitro experiments. S. epidermidisATCC 14990 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were obtained
from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA).
Preparation of SNAP-Impregnated Films and
Catheters
In order to determine the ideal solvent combination
for optimal SNAP impregnation into CarboSil, a series of solvents
were screened for their ability to swell CarboSil polymer pellets
and dissolve SNAP. The swelling capability of the solvents was reported
in percent aswhere Rbefore and Rafter are the radius of the polymer pellets
before and after the solvent impregnation process, respectively.Polymer films containing various wt % of SNAP were prepared by solvent
impregnation. First, 200 mg of the CarboSil polymer was dissolved
in 2 mL THF and then cast in a Teflon ring (d = 2.5
cm) on a Teflon plate and left to dry overnight under ambient condition
to obtain the blank polymer films. Small disks (d = 0.7 cm) were cut from the parent films and used as blank films.
Some blank CarboSil films were impregnated in SNAP solutions (120
mg/mL) in 30% MeOH and 70% MEK for different lengths of time and the
amount of SNAP (wt %) in the final films was analyzed to obtain time
needed to achieve maximum SNAP impregnation into the polymer films.
The CarboSil films were also treated with solutions containing different
concentrations of SNAP (5.5–120 mg/mL) for 2 h to achieve a
polymer impregnation profile in regard to the SNAP concentration in
the impregnation solution.The catheters used in the in vitro
and in vivo experiments were
prepared by dip coating CarboSil polymer solution on 20 cm long stainless
steel mandrels of 1.0 mm diameter (McMaster Carr, IL). The control
catheters and SNAP catheters were preparing by dip coating 22 coats
and 20 coats of polymer solution at 2 min intervals between each coat,
respectively. All catheters were allowed to dry overnight under ambient
conditions, protected from light, and then removed from the mandrel.
Similar to the SNAP-impregnated films, the SNAP-doped catheters were
also prepared by soaking in a SNAP solution (120 mg/mL) for 2 h. The
catheters were removed from the solution, rinsed with MeOH to wash
off the residual SNAP solution on the surfaces, and then allowed to
air-dry overnight to allow the MeOH and MEK solvents to evaporate
further, while the SNAP remains in the catheter. To achieve a smoother
surface after impregnation and to prolong NO release, two coats of
plain CarboSil polymer solution were applied to the outer surface
of the SNAP-impregnated catheters by dip-coating to achieve a total
of 22 coats. All the cured films and catheters were dried under vacuum
for an additional 48 h to remove solvents more thoroughly. The resulting
catheters have an i.d. of 1 mm and an o.d. of 2.2 mm.
Characterization of SNAP-Impregnated Films
and Catheters
UV–vis
All UV–vis
spectra of solvent dissolved pieces of known mass of the films or
catheters (in DMAc) were recorded in the wavelength range of 250−650
nm with a UV–vis spectrophotometer (Lambda 35, PerkinElmer,
MA) at room temperature. The molar absorptivity of SNAP in PBS at
340 nm was determined as εSNAP= 1075 M–1 cm–1. The characteristic absorbance at 340 and
590 nm correlate to the π → π* and nN → π* electronic transitions of the S-NO functional
group.[51,52]
NO Release Measurement
from SNAP-Impregnated
Catheters
Nitric oxide release from the SNAP-impregnated
CarboSil catheters was measured using a Sievers chemiluminescence
Nitric Oxide Analyzer (NOA) 280i (Boulder, CO). For example, a 15
wt % SNAP-impregnated CarboSil catheter with 2 CarboSil topcoats was
placed in the sample vial containing 4 mL of 10 mM PBS, pH 7.4, with
100 μM EDTA at 37 °C to mimic physiological conditions.
Nitric oxide was continuously generated and immediately purged and
swept into the chemiluminescence detection chamber by a N2 sweep gas and bubbler. All catheters were placed in fresh PBS buffer
during NO release measurements and incubated at 37 °C in the
absence of ambient light after each measurement. The reported NO flux
was the average flux during 4 h of NO release measurements for each
time point.
Cumulative NAP, NAP Disulfide,
and SNAP
Leaching from SNAP-Impregnated Catheters in Soaking PBS Buffer
The cumulative leaching of NAP, NAP disulfide and SNAP from the impregnated
catheters into 10 mM PBS, pH 7.4, with 100 μM EDTA at 37 °C
were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
(LC-MS), as previously described in detail.[43] Briefly, 15 wt % SNAP-impregnated CarboSil catheters were incubated
in 10 mL PBS buffer, pH 7.4, with 100 μM EDTA (to minimize trace
metal catalyzed decomposition of SNAP) in the dark at 37 °C to
minimize trace metal catalyzed decomposition of SNAP. At various time
points, aliquots (15 μL) of the soaking solution were analyzed
for the amount of NAP, NAP disulfide and SNAP in the soaking buffer.
The total amount of SNAP-related species is calculated from the following
equationThe soaking buffer was replaced with
new buffer
immediately after the measurement. The total amount of NAP, SNAP and
SNAP disulfide leached from the catheter was determined over 14 consecutive
days of measurements.
Evaluation of the Mechanical
Properties
for Catheters before and after Impregnation
Four different
catheters (5 cm) were prepared for mechanical property tests, including
the original CarboSil catheters prepared by dipcoating, CarboSil catheters
swelled by solvents only (and then dried), CarboSil catheters impregnated
with 7 and 15 wt % SNAP, respectively. Tensile testing of the catheters
was performed on an Instron 8800-series machine with Bluehill software
(Instron, Norwood, MA). To achieve a better grip on the catheters,
the catheters were cut in halves along the axial direction before
testing. The catheters had an initial gauge length of 11.55 mm and
were pulled at an extension rate of 40 mm/min, corresponding to a
strain rate of 0.0593 s–1. The tensile strength
(MPa) and maximum elongation (elongated length over the length of
the original) were compared for each of the catheter materials tested.
Long-Term (14 days) in Vitro Antibacterial
Experiments
S. epidermidis (ATCC 14990)
and P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) were used as model
bacterial strains in this study. Biofilm was developed onto the surfaces
of both control and NO release CarboSil catheters for 14 d using a
CDC biofilm reactor (Biosurface Technologies Corp., Bozeman, MT).
Details of the microbiology procedures used in relation to these studies
reported are provided in the Supporting Information.
in Vivo Antithrombotic Evaluation of Intravascular
Catheter in Rabbit Model
All animal handling and surgical
procedures employed in this research were approved by the University
of Michigan Committee on the Use and Care of Animals in accordance
with university and federal regulations. In short, 5 cm lengths of
the catheters (one SNAP-impregnated and one control) were inserted
into the external jugular veins of rabbits for 7 h to test the hemocompability
of both types of catheters. The detailed animal experiment procedures
are provided in the Supporting Information. At the end of the 7 h of experiments, the catheters were carefully
explanted from the veins with the thrombus intact on the catheter
surface. ImageJ imaging software provided by the National Institutes
of Health (NIH) was used to quantify the thrombus area on the surface
of both types of catheters.
Statistical Analysis
All experiments
were conducted in triplicate. Data are all expressed as mean ±
SEM (standard error of the mean). Comparison of means using student’s t test was utilized to analyze the statistical differences
between SNAP-impregnated catheters and control catheters. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant for
all tests.
Results and Discussion
Study of SNAP Impregnation Process of CarboSil
Polymer Films
To achieve desired SNAP loading into the CarboSilpolymer, an ideal solvent or solvent mixture needs to be employed
that has the following properties: (1) high solubility of SNAP; (2)
ability to significantly swell CarboSil polymer without harming the
material; and (3) evaporate to dryness in a reasonable time period.
Therefore, a series of solvents were examined for their ability to
swell the CarboSil polymer pellets as well as their SNAP solubility
limit. The swell ratio ([(Rafter – Rbefore)/Rbefore]
× 100) of solvents were compared and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK)
was found to exhibit the highest swell ratio of 166 ± 9% (with
155 ± 4% for acetone, 135 ± 3% for ethyl acetate and 110
± 3% for methanol (MeOH)). However, solubility tests indicated
that the SNAP solubility is only 30 mg/mL in MEK, 70 mg/mL in acetone,
and 30 mg/mL in ethyl acetate, but 330 mg/mL in MeOH. As a result,
a combination of MEK and MeOH was studied in order to determine the
optimal solvent composition for maximized SNAP impregnation into CarboSil
films and catheters, without destroying the structure of polymer.To optimize the MEK/MeOH solvent mixture for impregnation, we totally
immersed CarboSil polymeric materials (pellets, films or catheters)
into various MEK/MeOH swelling solutions. Then, the material was removed
from the swelling chamber, quickly rinsed with MeOH and DI water to
decrease any residue on the surface, and then air-dried in the ambient
environment protected from light exposure. After this process, the
polymer material was weighed, and then the impregnated polymer was
dissolved in DMAc for UV–vis absorbance measurements to determine
the total amount of SNAP incorporated into the final CarboSil material.
The results shown in Figure demonstrate that the optimal solvent combination is 70% MEK
and 30% MeOH (volume ratio). However, 90% MEK, 10% MeOH and 80% MEK,
20% MeOH can technically incorporate more total SNAP into the CarboSilpolymer, but the polymer pellets were easily destroyed and cracked
apart during the drying process using these ratios of solvents. As
shown in Figure S2, the amount of SNAP
impregnated into CarboSil can be modulated and the level directly
correlates with the concentration of SNAP employed in the swelling
solution (70% MEK and 30% MeOH). Indeed, the wt % of SNAP in the final
CarboSil material increased from 2.5 to 15.7% in near linear fashion
when the SNAP concentration increased from 5.5 to 120 mg/mL.
Figure 1
Weight percentage
(wt %) of SNAP achieved in CarboSil pellets (mg
SNAP/mg impregnated CarboSil pellet ×100%) using different solvent
mixtures for the impregnation process.
Weight percentage
(wt %) of SNAP achieved in CarboSil pellets (mg
SNAP/mg impregnated CarboSil pellet ×100%) using different solvent
mixtures for the impregnation process.To study the SNAP impregnation kinetics as a function of
polymer
film thickness and to determine the time required to achieve maximum
impregnation, blank CarboSil films of both 250 and 500 μm in
thickness were prepared. The films were then soaked into a solution
of 120 mg/mL SNAP in 70% MEK/30% MeOH (n = 3 for
each condition), for 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 min,
respectively. After thorough drying, the films were weighed and then
dissolved in DMAc to quantify the SNAP wt % within the films. The
impregnation profile (Figure ) indicated that the maximum impregnation is achieved within
2 h, and there is no significant difference between 250 μm thick
films and 500 μm thick films. This suggests that the solvent
impregnation process is capable of incorporating SNAP into various
sized catheters (different wall thicknesses, etc.) without requiring
any significant additional time for the impregnation process.
Figure 2
Kinetics of
SNAP impregnation in CarboSil film using 120 mg/mL
SNAP in swelling solution (70% MEK and 30% MeOH), with respect to
swelling time and polymer thickness. The results indicate that maximum
SNAP incorporation is achieved within 2 h of swelling and there is
no significant difference in loading when using films with different
thickness (250 μm vs 500 μm).
Kinetics of
SNAP impregnation in CarboSil film using 120 mg/mL
SNAP in swelling solution (70% MEK and 30% MeOH), with respect to
swelling time and polymer thickness. The results indicate that maximum
SNAP incorporation is achieved within 2 h of swelling and there is
no significant difference in loading when using films with different
thickness (250 μm vs 500 μm).
Solid-State Analysis of SNAP-Impregnated CarboSil
Polymer System
Our group has previously reported solid-state
studies of SNAP-doped CarboSil films formed by casting a THF solution
containing SNAP and CarboSil polymer into a Teflon plate and allowing
the solvent to completely evaporate.[43] The
elevated shelf life stability of SNAP in CarboSil was only observed
when the SNAP level within the CarboSil exceeds its solubility in
the CarboSil and forms orthorhombic crystals that embed in the bulk
of the polymer matrix. In this work that demonstrates the SNAP impregnation
approach using premade CarboSil films, similar solid-state characterizations
were conducted to examine the resulting films. As shown in Figure S3), clear SNAP crystalline patterns were
observed for the 5 wt % SNAP-impregnated samples under a polarized
microscope, indicating to the presence of SNAP crystals in the polymer
matrix at this SNAP concentration. Additional microscope images of
the cross-section of the SNAP-impregnated CarboSil films were also
taken to determine if SNAP impregnated into the bulk polymer matrix
or if the crystals exhibit depth dependent distribution when they
are formed after the solvent evaporates. Thin slices (30 μm)
of the cross-section of 5 wt % SNAP-impregnated CarboSil films were
obtained by using the Leica 3050S cryostat. Figure shows examples of the optical images of
the cross section of the film, which clearly illustrate that SNAP
crystals are distributed relatively uniformly within the polymer matrix
after impregnation, rather than merely present on the polymer film’s
outer surfaces.
Figure 3
Representative optical images of the cross-section of
5 wt % SNAP-impregnated
CarboSil films. The images were captured by Leica DM2500 LED microscope
with a 20× and a 50× (inset) objective under crossed polarizers.
The cross-section of film samples was cut into 30 μm thick slices
by the Leica 3050S cryostat. The SNAP was impregnated successfully
into the bulk of the polymer film and distributed relatively evenly
throughout the cross-section.
Representative optical images of the cross-section of
5 wt % SNAP-impregnated
CarboSil films. The images were captured by Leica DM2500 LED microscope
with a 20× and a 50× (inset) objective under crossed polarizers.
The cross-section of film samples was cut into 30 μm thick slices
by the Leica 3050S cryostat. The SNAP was impregnated successfully
into the bulk of the polymer film and distributed relatively evenly
throughout the cross-section.In principle, SNAP’s solubility limit in the CarboSilpolymer
should be constant regardless of preparation methodology (e.g., casting
polymer solution or solvent impregnation). The PXRD patterns of the
CarboSil films impregnated with various loading of SNAP were collected
and analyzed (Figure ). In our previous work, the solubility of SNAP in CarboSil when
SNAP was added into polymer solution before casting was calculated
by using the ratio of a selected SNAP crystalline peak area over the
total area of the sample pattern.[43] Herein
the method used to calculate the SNAP solubility in the polymers used
the ratio of peak heights instead of peak area because this is more
generally applicable to various polymers that have broad diffraction
peaks. In short, based on the following assumptions that (1) crystalline
SNAP is uniformly distributed in the polymer phase, and (2) that the
preferred orientation of SNAP crystals in the polymer could be eliminated
by cutting samples into cubes and rotating the samples during data
collection, the ratio of a specific SNAP crystalline peak height over
the polymer peak height should be proportional to the ratio of crystalline
SNAP wt % over the polymer wt % in the sample. By using the height
ratio for quantification, all of the other factors that can potentially
influence peak intensity (e.g., the volume of the sample irradiated
by the X-ray source, the exposure time of sample under the X-ray,
etc.) can be eliminated. Here, the SNAP solubility in polymer, represented
as xo, can be calculated from y2θ, the height ratio of a SNAP peak over
the height of a polymer peakwhere ISNAP2θ and Ipolymer2θ are the signal intensities of SNAP
and polymer in a SNAP impregnated polymer sample at angle 2θ,
obtained in each measurement. For a PXRD pattern of a unit volume
sample taken with a unit exposure time, a and b correspond to the peak height of pure orthorhombic crystal
and blank CarboSil pattern at a given 2θ, respectively. When
the SNAP weight percentage is x, the height ratio
of SNAP peak height over CarboSil peak height at a given 2θ
(y2θ), should be proportional to
the weight percentage ratio of the undissolved SNAP crystal (x – x) over the weight percentage of CarboSil (1–x). By substituting various x and y2θ at chosen 2θ angles, the solubility xo can be determined. Based on this calculation,
the solubility of SNAP in the impregnated CarboSil material was found
to be 2.4 ± 0.1 wt %, which is significantly lower than the result
of 4.3 ± 0.3 wt %, calculated from films obtained by casting
SNAP and CarboSil polymer solution (if also using this height based
method).[43]
Figure 4
Representative PXRD patterns of orthorhombic
SNAP crystal, CarboSil
blank polymer, and CarboSil impregnated with SNAP of different weight
percentages. Characteristic peaks of orthorhombic SNAP were detected
in samples. Peak intensity of crystalline SNAP increased with higher
loading of SNAP in polymer.
Representative PXRD patterns of orthorhombic
SNAP crystal, CarboSil
blank polymer, and CarboSil impregnated with SNAP of different weight
percentages. Characteristic peaks of orthorhombic SNAP were detected
in samples. Peak intensity of crystalline SNAP increased with higher
loading of SNAP in polymer.We attribute the decrease in calculated SNAP solubility to
insufficient
“dissolution” of impregnated SNAP molecules in the polymer
to reach its solubility equilibrium in the polymer phase during the
solvent impregnation method. When the polymer film is prepared by
casting dissolved SNAP in a CarboSil solution (in THF),[43] the SNAP molecules and CarboSil polymer chains
are uniformly mixed within the solvent. Therefore, the SNAP molecules
are well dispersed in the polymer matrix to form a solid polymer solution
before the solvent completely evaporates and the solution reaches
its SNAP solubility limit which ultimately leads to the SNAP crystallization
(Figure S4A). However, during the swelling-impregnation
process, SNAP can only be “inserted” into the space
between polymer chains when the premade CarboSil film is swelled by
the MEK/MeOH solvent mixture. The diffusion of SNAP molecules within
solid polymers may be less efficient compared to the polymer casting
method when SNAP and polymer are all completely dissolved and well
mixed. In addition, the swelling effect of solvent mixture may also
vary for different polymer segments. For example, the interspace between
the soft segments of CarboSil may be swelled more by the solvent and
enable easier impregnation of SNAP molecules, which may result in
different microenvironments for SNAP crystallization at the different
polymer segment sites (see Figure S4B).
In summary, we hypothesize that SNAP cannot diffuse and reach solubility
equilibrium in the polymer during solvent impregnation as easily as
it does when SNAP and polymer are well mixed in a solvent, as is in
the polymer casting method. Therefore, SNAP aggregates as crystals
and forms a polymer crystal composite more readily in the solvent
impregnation process that uses premade polymer devices (e.g., films
or catheters).
Mechanical Properties Tests
Tension
testing was performed in order to assess the changes in mechanical
properties caused by solvent swelling and SNAP impregnation. Of note,
the Instron machine was not able to obtain a firm grip on the original
CarboSil catheters during the elongation process with the current
experimental setup. Thus, the analysis results below only contain
three experimental groups; the swelling solvent only, 7 wt % SNAP,
and 15 wt % SNAP, with triplicates of each type of sample tested (n = 3). One-way ANOVA results revealed no significant difference
in tensile strength (p = 0.15) or maximum elongation
(p = 0.42) among the three groups (see Figure ). The results indicate that
the catheters are still mechanically suitable for biomedical use after
the impregnation process.
Figure 5
(A) Tensile strength testing and (B) the maximum
elongation results
for CarboSil tubing impregnated by solvents only, and CarboSil tubing
with 7 and 15 wt % SNAP loading, respectively. Results are average
± SEM for n = 3 for each experiment.
(A) Tensile strength testing and (B) the maximum
elongation results
for CarboSil tubing impregnated by solvents only, and CarboSil tubing
with 7 and 15 wt % SNAP loading, respectively. Results are average
± SEM for n = 3 for each experiment.
NO Release Measurement
of SNAP-Impregnated
CarboSil Catheters
The 15 wt % SNAP-impregnated CarboSil
catheters with CarboSil topcoats release NO above a flux rate of 0.5
× 10–10 mol cm–2 min–1 for 14 d in PBS buffer at 37 °C. The NO release
rate from the catheters was quantitated and recorded by chemiluminescence
measurements. A burst of NO release (∼4 × 10–10 mol cm–2 min–1) was observed
on day 0, and this correlates with rapid SNAP leaching from the outermost
layer of the catheter surface into the buffer. After depletion of
the SNAP reservoir in this outermost region, the NO release rate drops
to its minimal level at day 2 (∼1 × 10–10 mol cm–2 min–1) and then gradually
increases to 4 × 10–10 mol cm–2 min–1 over the next 10 d period (Figure ). The NO release levels then
drop below 0.5 × 10–10 mol cm–2 min–1 after d 14, as all the SNAP in the bulk
of the polymer has decomposed. As indicated in Section above, the majority of
the SNAP molecules impregnated in the catheters are in their crystalline
form, and it takes time for the crystalline SNAP embedded in the bulk
of the polymer to dissolve and release its NO. We believe that this
slow crystal dissolution process is the reason for the long-term NO
release observed from these new SNAP-impregnated CarboSil catheters.
Figure 6
NO release
profile of 15 wt % SNAP-impregnated CarboSil catheters
over time. The catheters were prepared with CarboSil outer coating
(n = 3).
NO release
profile of 15 wt % SNAP-impregnated CarboSil catheters
over time. The catheters were prepared with CarboSil outer coating
(n = 3).
Cumulative Leaching of NAP, NAP Disulfide,
and SNAP from SNAP-Impregnated CarboSil Catheters
The concentrations
of NAP, NAP disulfide and SNAP leached from SNAP-impregnated CarboSil
catheters were monitored by LC-MS using a method previously reported.[43] As shown in Figure , 12% of the initial SNAP (80 nmol/mg polymer)
diffuses out of the catheter over the 14 d test period. The rate of
SNAP leaching is the greatest in the first few hours after introducing
the catheter to the soaking buffer, and then a significant lower amount
of SNAP continues to diffuse into the buffer over the following days.
Similar leaching patterns were observed for both NAP and NAP disulfide.
A total of 12 nmol/mg polymerNAP and 46 nmol/mg polymerNAP disulfide
(2 and 14% of the initial SNAP present in the catheter, respectively)
leached into the buffer over 2 weeks. NAP is the parent thiol used
in SNAP synthesis, and NAP has been a widely used chelating and detoxifying
agent for treating patients with heavy metal ion poisoning (e.g.,
cadmium, arsenic, and mercury) for many years.[53,54] Therefore, NAP and NAP dimer (NAP disulfide) emitted from the SNAP
catheter into the buffer or bloodstream are considered relatively
safe and unlikely to cause any adverse or toxic response in potential
clinical applications.[43] Overall, the total
moles of SNAP-related species ([all SNAP-related species]total) leached out over the 14 d test period is approximately 28% of the
total NO (in moles) released from the catheter, which means more than
70% of the NO is released directly from SNAP molecules residing within
polymeric matrix. Since NO is highly reactive in vivo and will be
rapidly scavenged by surrounding species (e.g., oxyhemoglobin, oxygen),[55,56] to achieve therapeutic functions of NO, it is essential for the
catheters to deliver localized NO release at their surface with minimal
NO donor leaching. On the basis of results from the leaching studies,
this appears to be the case for the new SNAP impregnated CarboSil
biomaterial.
Figure 7
Cumulative leaching of NAP, NAP disulfide, and SNAP into
1 mL of
PBS (soaking buffer) from 15 wt % SNAP-impregnated CarboSil catheters
over a period of 14 days, at 37 °C in the dark. Data are mean
± SEM (n = 3).
Cumulative leaching of NAP, NAP disulfide, and SNAP into
1 mL of
PBS (soaking buffer) from 15 wt % SNAP-impregnated CarboSil catheters
over a period of 14 days, at 37 °C in the dark. Data are mean
± SEM (n = 3).
Prevention of Mature Microbial Biofilm Formation
Because stable NO release from biomedical devices is expected to
reduce bacterial adhesion and proliferation, in vitro antimicrobial
experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of SNAP-impregnated
Carbosil catheters against bacterial infections caused by microbes, S. epidermidis and P. aeruginosa, commonly
responsible for catheter-related bloodstream infections. S.
epidermidis has always been regarded as an innocuous and
commensal inhabitant of healthy mucosal microflora and possesses lower
pathogenic potential than S. aureus and P.
aeruginosa,[57] but more recently S. epidermidis has been shown to be the most frequent cause
of infections on indwelling medical devices.[50,58] This likely stems from the prevalence of S. epidermidis on human skin which results in a high probability of contamination
during IV catheter insertion. It has also been reported that the primary
virulence factor of S. epidermidis is its potential
capability to form high-biomass biofilm.[44,59−61] Moreover, many studies have shown that treatment
of S. epidermidis biofilm cells with high dose of
antibiotics (e.g., rifampicin, vancomycin, etc.) accelerates the emergence
of highly resistant cells.[16,62,63] Indeed, genome sequence studies of S. epidermidis strains isolated from IV catheters in the hospital have expressed
specific antibiotic resistance genes and required much higher concentrations
of antibiotics for treatment.[50,58,63,64] The cost related to CRBSIs caused
by S. epidermidis alone is estimated to $2 billion
annually in US.[65] In contrast, Gram-negative
bacteria account for ∼30% of all episodes of nosocomial bacteremia,[66,67] and P. aeruginosa is reported to cause 16% of all
the CRBSIs.[1,68] Infections caused by P. aeruginosa often occur in patients with more serious
underlying disease, e.g., extensive trauma.[69] Further, it is important to examine the antimicrobial effect of
NO release catheters against this particular strain of bacteria because P. aeruginosa possesses the NO reductase enzyme which makes
the bacteria cells able to metabolize and deactivate NO, and convert
NO to nitrous oxide (N2O) and ultimately nitrogen.[70,71]The CDC biofilm reactor used in this study provides a model
that offers an environment that mimics the bacterial growth on the
polymer surface under moderate fluid sheer stress.[72] Therefore, this methodology was utilized to simulate bacterial
biofilm development on the surface of IV catheters that will take
place in the bloodstream. All SNAP catheters and control catheters
were initially sterilized by ethylene oxide (EO) and kept antiseptic
before use. Ethylene oxide sterilization is a routine procedure for
sterilizing clinical appliances within hospitals, during which the
devices are subjected to high temperature and high humidity level.[73,74] The amount of SNAP remaining in the catheters after EO sterilization
was determined to be 97.4 ± 0.8%, suggesting that SNAP is very
stable as crystals embedded within the CarboSil polymer during the
sterilization process. The sterilized SNAP catheter segments and control
catheter segments (n = 4) were mounted onto coupons
within the CDC bioreactor and bacterial biofilms were formed on the
surface of both catheters over a 14 d period at 37 °C. After
that time period, the number of live microbes on the surface of the
catheters was determined by plate counting as well as fluorescence
imaging. As shown in Figures and 9, the number of viable S. epidermidis and P. aeruginosa adhered
on the surface of SNAP impregnated catheter segments after 14 d was
reduced by 2.0 and 2.5 log units, respectively. These findings were
substantiated by the fluorescence imaging data, in which the control
catheter surfaces were covered by a high biomass biofilm while the
SNAP catheter surfaces had noticeably less bacterial coverage and
most of the bacteria on SNAP catheter surfaces were single bacterial
cells. The results demonstrate that decreasing bacteria colonization
and biofilm formation on the surfaces of SNAP-impregnated CarboSil
catheter through continuous NO release may lead to reduced risk of
catheter-related bloodstream infections.
Figure 8
S. epidermidis biofilms developed on catheter
segments in a CDC biofilm reactor for 14 d at 37 °C. Upper image:
Bar graph of plate count data for adhesion of viable S. epidermidis bacteria to the catheter surfaces. Lower images: Representative
fluorescence microscopic images of (A) surface live (green) and (B)
dead (red) bacteria on different catheters, acquired by oil immersion
60× objective lens of the biofilms on the surface of the catheter,
scale bar 20 μm.
Figure 9
P. aeruginosa biofilms developed on catheter segments
in a CDC biofilm reactor for 14 d at 37 °C. Upper image: Bar
graph of plate count data for adhesion of viable P. aeruginosa bacteria to the catheter surfaces. Lower images: Representative
fluorescence microscopic images of surface live (green) (A) and/or
dead (red) (B) bacteria on different catheters, acquired by oil immersion
60× objective lens, scale bar 20 μm.
S. epidermidis biofilms developed on catheter
segments in a CDC biofilm reactor for 14 d at 37 °C. Upper image:
Bar graph of plate count data for adhesion of viable S. epidermidis bacteria to the catheter surfaces. Lower images: Representative
fluorescence microscopic images of (A) surface live (green) and (B)
dead (red) bacteria on different catheters, acquired by oil immersion
60× objective lens of the biofilms on the surface of the catheter,
scale bar 20 μm.P. aeruginosa biofilms developed on catheter segments
in a CDC biofilm reactor for 14 d at 37 °C. Upper image: Bar
graph of plate count data for adhesion of viable P. aeruginosa bacteria to the catheter surfaces. Lower images: Representative
fluorescence microscopic images of surface live (green) (A) and/or
dead (red) (B) bacteria on different catheters, acquired by oil immersion
60× objective lens, scale bar 20 μm.
Reduction of Thrombus Formation in Rabbit
Model
In vivo experiments using an acute 7 h rabbit thrombogenicity
model were conducted to examine the benefits of the SNAP-impregnated
CarboSil IV catheters with respect to decreasing clot formation. One
SNAP catheter and one control catheter were placed into the external
jugular veins of each rabbit (n = 3) for 7 h. At
the end of the 7 h implantation, the catheters were carefully removed
from the blood vessel while any thrombus formation was left intact
on the catheter surface. In order to determine the area of clot formation,
digital images of both the SNAP impregnated and control catheters
were taken and the two-dimensional representation of the clot areas
were quantitated using ImageJ software from NIH. The clot area on
the control catheter was 0.84 ± 0.19 cm2/catheter,
whereas the clot area on the SNAP catheter was 0.03 ± 0.01 cm2/catheter, considerably less than the controls (see Figure ).
Figure 10
Five centimeters of
the catheters (left of the dashed line) were
inserted into the rabbit external jugular veins for 7 h. (A) Representative
pictures of the thrombus formation on the SNAP-impregnated CarboSil
and control CarboSil catheters from one rabbit experiment. (B) Two-dimensional
representation of the clot area (cm2) on SNAP and control
catheter in rabbit veins for 7 h, as quantitated using ImageJ software
by NIH. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 3 animal
experiments. * = p < 0.05.
Five centimeters of
the catheters (left of the dashed line) were
inserted into the rabbit external jugular veins for 7 h. (A) Representative
pictures of the thrombus formation on the SNAP-impregnated CarboSil
and control CarboSil catheters from one rabbit experiment. (B) Two-dimensional
representation of the clot area (cm2) on SNAP and control
catheter in rabbit veins for 7 h, as quantitated using ImageJ software
by NIH. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 3 animal
experiments. * = p < 0.05.The NO release rates from the postsurgery SNAP catheters
were quantitated
using chemiluminescence and the SNAP catheters were shown to maintain
NO release at an average flux of 4.4 ± 1.1 × 10–10 mol cm–2 min–1 at 37 °C.
This result clearly illustrates that continuous localized NO release
from the SNAP impregnated CarboSil catheter has the potential to greatly
reduce the risk of clot formation on the catheter’s surface,
thereby maintaining the functionality of IV catheters during use and
reducing the risk of stroke or deep vein thrombosis associated with
detached blood clots.
Conclusion
In summary,
a simple solvent impregnation procedure has been adapted
to incorporate SNAP into CarboSil 20 80A polymer. The impregnation
process was optimized to achieve maximized SNAP loading and long-term
NO release. The majority of the SNAP incorporated in 15 wt % SNAP-impregnated
CarboSil films exists in its crystalline form, and more than 70% of
the total NO release originates directly from the SNAP decomposition
within the bulk of the polymer phase. The 15 wt % SNAP-impregnated
CarboSil catheters release NO at physiological levels for at least
14 d. The NO release catheters reduce viable S. epidermidis and P. aeruginosa bacteria adhesion to the surface
of the catheters after 14 d was by 2 and 2.5 log units, respectively.
The SNAP catheters also exhibit minimal clot formation after 7 h of
implantation in a rabbit model when compared to the control CarboSil
catheters. Overall, both the in vitro and in vivo studies clearly
demonstrate the potential of the SNAP impregnation method to improve
the hemocompatibility/antimicrobial activity of IV catheters made
with CarboSil polymer. It is anticipated that these results will encourage
further pursuit of this strategy in designing the next-generation
commercial IV catheters and other implantable biomedical devices to
greatly reduce risk of infection and thrombosis in patients.
Authors: Chenell Donadee; Nicolaas J H Raat; Tamir Kanias; Jesús Tejero; Janet S Lee; Eric E Kelley; Xuejun Zhao; Chen Liu; Hannah Reynolds; Ivan Azarov; Sheila Frizzell; E Michael Meyer; Albert D Donnenberg; Lirong Qu; Darrel Triulzi; Daniel B Kim-Shapiro; Mark T Gladwin Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-07-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Naomi P O'Grady; Mary Alexander; E Patchen Dellinger; Julie L Gerberding; Stephen O Heard; Dennis G Maki; Henry Masur; Rita D McCormick; Leonard A Mermel; Michele L Pearson; Issam I Raad; Adrienne Randolph; Robert A Weinstein Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2002-08-09
Authors: Darla M Goeres; Linda R Loetterle; Martin A Hamilton; Ricardo Murga; Douglas W Kirby; Rodney M Donlan Journal: Microbiology (Reading) Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 2.777
Authors: Yaqi Wo; Zi Li; Elizabeth J Brisbois; Alessandro Colletta; Jianfeng Wu; Terry C Major; Chuanwu Xi; Robert H Bartlett; Adam J Matzger; Mark E Meyerhoff Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Megan E Douglass; Marcus J Goudie; Jitendra Pant; Priyadarshini Singha; Sean Hopkins; Ryan Devine; Chad W Schmiedt; Hitesh Handa Journal: ACS Appl Bio Mater Date: 2019-05-07
Authors: M M McCabe; P Hala; A Rojas-Pena; O Lautner-Csorba; T C Major; H Ren; R H Bartlett; E J Brisbois; M E Meyerhoff Journal: Talanta Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 6.057
Authors: Xuewei Wang; Aaron Jolliffe; Benjamin Carr; Qi Zhang; Mark Bilger; Yu Cui; Jianfeng Wu; Xianglong Wang; Mollie Mahoney; Alvaro Rojas-Pena; Mark J Hoenerhoff; Justin Douglas; Robert H Bartlett; Chuanwu Xi; Joseph L Bull; Mark E Meyerhoff Journal: Biomater Sci Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 6.843
Authors: Yaqi Wo; Li-Chong Xu; Zi Li; Adam J Matzger; Mark E Meyerhoff; Christopher A Siedlecki Journal: Biomater Sci Date: 2017-06-27 Impact factor: 6.843