Literature DB >> 15758222

Statistical assessment of a laboratory method for growing biofilms.

Darla M Goeres1, Linda R Loetterle1, Martin A Hamilton1, Ricardo Murga2, Douglas W Kirby3, Rodney M Donlan2.   

Abstract

Microbial biofilms have been grown in laboratories using a variety of different approaches. A laboratory biofilm reactor system, called the CDC biofilm reactor (CBR) system, has been devised for growing biofilms under moderate to high fluid shear stress. The reactor incorporates 24 removable biofilm growth surfaces (coupons) for sampling and analysing the biofilm. Following preliminary experiments to verify the utility of the CBR system for growing biofilms of several clinically relevant organisms, a standard operating procedure for growing a Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm was created. This paper presents the results of a rigorous, intra-laboratory, statistical evaluation of the repeatability and ruggedness of that procedure as well as the results of the experiments with clinically relevant organisms. For the statistical evaluations, the outcome of interest was the density (c.f.u. cm(-2)) of viable P. aeruginosa. Replicate experiments were conducted to assess the repeatability of the log density outcome. The mean P. aeruginosa log10 density was 7.1, independent of the coupon position within the reactor. The repeatability standard deviation of the log density based on one coupon per experiment was 0.59. Analysis of variance showed that the variability of the log density was 53 % attributable to within-experiment sources and 47 % attributable to between-experiments sources. The ruggedness evaluation applied response-surface design and regression analysis techniques, similar to those often used for sensitivity analyses in other fields of science and engineering. This approach provided a quantitative description of ruggedness; specifically, the amount the log density was altered by small adjustments to four key operational factors--time allowed for initial surface colonization, temperature, nutrient concentration, and fluid shear stress on the biofilm. The small size of the regression coefficient associated with each operational factor showed that the method was rugged; that is, relatively insensitive to minor perturbations of the four factors. These results demonstrate that the CBR system is a reliable experimental tool for growing a standard biofilm in the laboratory and that it can be adapted to study several different micro-organisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15758222     DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.27709-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)        ISSN: 1350-0872            Impact factor:   2.777


  71 in total

1.  Microtiter susceptibility testing of microbes growing on peg lids: a miniaturized biofilm model for high-throughput screening.

Authors:  Joe J Harrison; Carol A Stremick; Raymond J Turner; Nick D Allan; Merle E Olson; Howard Ceri
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Can Near-infrared Spectroscopy Detect and Differentiate Implant-associated Biofilms?

Authors:  John E Tidwell; Ben Dawson-Andoh; Emmanuel O Adedipe; Kofi Nkansah; Matthew J Dietz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A method for growing a biofilm under low shear at the air-liquid interface using the drip flow biofilm reactor.

Authors:  Darla M Goeres; Martin A Hamilton; Nicholas A Beck; Kelli Buckingham-Meyer; Jackie D Hilyard; Linda R Loetterle; Lindsey A Lorenz; Diane K Walker; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Embedded biofilm, a new biofilm model based on the embedded growth of bacteria.

Authors:  Yong-Gyun Jung; Jungil Choi; Soo-Kyoung Kim; Joon-Hee Lee; Sunghoon Kwon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Measuring Antimicrobial Efficacy against Biofilms: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Philip S Stewart; Albert E Parker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  A Platform of Anti-biofilm Assays Suited to the Exploration of Natural Compound Libraries.

Authors:  Malena E Skogman; Pia M Vuorela; Adyary Fallarero
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 7.  Composition and development of oral bacterial communities.

Authors:  Robert J Palmer
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.589

8.  Diazeniumdiolate-doped poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-based nitric oxide releasing films as antibiofilm coatings.

Authors:  Wenyi Cai; Jianfeng Wu; Chuanwu Xi; Mark E Meyerhoff
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Identification of peptides derived from the human antimicrobial peptide LL-37 active against biofilms formed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa using a library of truncated fragments.

Authors:  C Nagant; B Pitts; K Nazmi; M Vandenbranden; J G Bolscher; P S Stewart; J-P Dehaye
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Biofilm growth of individual and dual strains of Klebsiella oxytoca from the dairy industry on ultrafiltration membranes.

Authors:  Xuemei Tang; Steve H Flint; Rod J Bennett; John D Brooks; R Hugh Morton
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.346

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.