Literature DB >> 28315650

Retrospective Analysis of Reproductive Performance of Pair-bred Compared with Trio-bred Mice.

Katherine Wasson1.   

Abstract

Federal guidelines provide recommendations regarding the minimum of floor space that should be allotted for breeding laboratory rodents. Mouse mating systems used by a variety of institutions frequently deviate from these recommendations. Regulatory agencies suggest that deviations from established guidelines should be assessed on an institutional basis and recommend periodic review by the local IACUC. Mouse breeding data, collected in a laboratory animal management software program at a single institution, were retrospectively analyzed to determine the effects of 2 breeding schemes on reproductive performance. Data were analyzed over a 20-mo period from all inbred strains of mice breeding in the vivarium. Variables included total number of pups per litter, pups per female, and litters per female. Data indicated that the numbers of pups and litters per dam do not differ between trio-bred (one male, 2 female) and pair-bred (one male, one female) mice. However, more pups were weaned per litter in trio-bred (mean, 5.8 pups) when-compared with pair-bred (mean, 4.7 pups) mice. These results suggest that allocating less than the recommended amount of floor space is not detrimental to the overall breeding success of the strains of mice examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28315650      PMCID: PMC5361046     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  26 in total

1.  Maternal investment of communally nursing female house mice (Mus musculus domesticus).

Authors:  B König
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Communal nursing in mice: influence of multiple mothers on the growth of the young.

Authors:  A Sayler; M Salmon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-06-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  General parity between trio and pairwise breeding of laboratory mice in static caging.

Authors:  Ross M Kedl; Lawrence J Wysocki; William J Janssen; Willi K Born; Matthew D Rosenbaum; Julia Granowski; Jennifer A Kench; Derek L Fong; Lisa A Switzer; Margaret Cruse; Hua Huang; Claudia V Jakubzick; Beata Kosmider; Katsuyuki Takeda; Thomas J Stranova; Randal C Klumm; Christine Delgado; Saigiridhar Tummala; Stijn De Langhe; John Cambier; Katherine Haskins; Laurel L Lenz; Douglas Curran-Everett
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  The effect of daily disturbance on the breeding performance of mice.

Authors:  Alan G Peters; Peter M Bywater; Michael F W Festing
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.471

5.  The effect of cage size on reproductive performance and behavior of C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Julia Whitaker; Sheryl S Moy; Benjamin R Saville; Virginia Godfrey; Judith Nielsen; Dwight Bellinger; John Bradfield
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 12.625

6.  Breeding structure of the house mouse, Mus musculus, in a population cage.

Authors:  J D Reimer; M L Petras
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 2.416

7.  Communal nursing in wild house mice is not a by-product of group living: females choose.

Authors:  Andrea Weidt; Anna K Lindholm; Barbara König
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-01-04

8.  Effects of Varied Housing Density on a Hybrid Mouse Strain Followed for 20 Months.

Authors:  Beverly Paigen; Joanne M Currer; Karen L Svenson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of housing density in five inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  Judith L Morgan; Karen L Svenson; Jeffrey P Lake; Weidong Zhang; Timothy M Stearns; Michael A Marion; Luanne L Peters; Beverly Paigen; Leah Rae Donahue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Two of a Kind or a Full House? Reproductive Suppression and Alloparenting in Laboratory Mice.

Authors:  Joseph P Garner; Brianna N Gaskill; Kathleen R Pritchett-Corning
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of Trio and Pair Breeding of Mice on Environmental Parameters and Nasal Pathology and Their Implications for Cage Change Frequency.

Authors:  Kelsey C Carpenter; Sarah E Thurston; Mark J Hoenerhoff; Jennifer L Lofgren
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Effect of Continuous Trio Breeding Compared with Continuous Pair Breeding in 'Shoebox' Caging on Measures of Reproductive Performance in Estrogen Receptor Knockout Mice.

Authors:  Tom T Chatkupt; Nicole L Libal; Sarah L Mader; Stephanie J Murphy; Kim E Saunders
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Impact of Automated Genotyping and Increased Breeding Oversight on Overall Mouse Breeding Colony Productivity.

Authors:  Kelly R VanDenBerg; Katherine Oravecz-Wilson; Lauren Krolikowski; Valerie Hill; Pavan Reddy; Zachary T Freeman
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.755

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.