Literature DB >> 32111266

Effects of Trio and Pair Breeding of Mice on Environmental Parameters and Nasal Pathology and Their Implications for Cage Change Frequency.

Kelsey C Carpenter1, Sarah E Thurston1, Mark J Hoenerhoff2, Jennifer L Lofgren3.   

Abstract

According to the Guide, cage change frequencies must be considered when cage density requirements are exceeded. We monitored ammonia, carbon dioxide, cage wetness, health status, and breeding parameters of trio and pair breeding cages containing CD1 mice in ventilated and static microisolation caging (4 cages per condition) daily for approximately 6 wk. Minimum cage change frequencies for each condition were determined on the basis of performance data. At 3 d after cage change, static trio and pair cages had average ammonia levels of 74 and 38 ppm. Ventilated cages remained below the 25ppm threshold reported to be potentially deleterious for mice until at least day 7 after cage change. By 7 d after cage change, ammonia levels had risen to an average of 100 ppm and 64 ppm in static trio and pair cages and to 34 ppm and 20 ppm in ventilated trio and pair cages, respectively. Ammonia levels in ventilated cages continued to rise slowly through day 14 after cage change. CO₂ levels exceeded 5000 ppm in all groups at 2 d after cage change. Pair breeders in ventilated cages took the longest-10 to 14 d-to reach cage wetness threshold scores. On day 7, pups in trio static cages were noted to have decreased and squinted eyes, whereas in ventilated cages containing trios and pairs, these clinical signs were rare to absent. Histologically, there was an increasing incidence and severity of nasal lesions in weanlings with increasing housing density and decreasing ventilation, consistent with nasal epithelial toxicity. Given these parameters, we concluded that under the current husbandry conditions, it may be necessary to change breeders in static cages more frequently than every 7 d. Additional studies are necessary to evaluate the effects of more frequent cage changes on reproductive parameters, given that cage changing is stressful for mice and affects breeding results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32111266      PMCID: PMC7210739          DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-19-000074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  61 in total

Review 1.  A renewed look at laboratory rodent housing and management.

Authors:  Janet C Gonder; Kathy Laber
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2007

2.  Characterization and quantification of microenvironmental contaminants in isolator cages with a variety of contact beddings.

Authors:  S E Perkins; N S Lipman
Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1995-05

3.  Microenvironments in Microisolation Cages Using BALB/c and CD-1 Mice.

Authors:  J J Hasenau; R B Baggs; A L Kraus
Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1993-01

4.  Unexpected nasal changes in rats related to reflux after gavage dosing.

Authors:  Siegrid Damsch; Gary Eichenbaum; Adriana Looszova; Lieve Lammens; Bianca Feyen; Kathleen Van den Bulck; Elaine Knight; Michael Kelley; Alfred Tonelli
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 1.902

5.  Long-term effects of cage-cleaning frequency and bedding type on laboratory rat health, welfare, and handleability: a cross-laboratory study.

Authors:  Charlotte C Burn; Alan Peters; Michael J Day; Georgia J Mason
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.471

6.  Ammonia Levels and Urine-Spot Characteristics as Cage-Change Indicators for High-Density Individually Ventilated Mouse Cages.

Authors:  Ida M Washington; Mark E Payton
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.232

7.  Reduction of exposure to laboratory animal allergens in the workplace.

Authors:  S Gordon; J Wallace; A Cook; R D Tee; A J Newman Taylor
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.018

8.  Effects of a 28-day cage-change interval on intracage ammonia levels, nasal histology, and perceived welfare of CD1 mice.

Authors:  Catherine M Vogelweid; Kathleen A Zapien; Matthew J Honigford; Linghui Li; Hua Li; Heather Marshall
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  Revised guides for organ sampling and trimming in rats and mice--part 1.

Authors:  Christine Ruehl-Fehlert; Birgit Kittel; Gerd Morawietz; Paul Deslex; Charlotte Keenan; Charles R Mahrt; Thomas Nolte; Mervyn Robinson; Barry P Stuart; Ulrich Deschl
Journal:  Exp Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2003-09

Review 10.  Not so hot: Optimal housing temperatures for mice to mimic the thermal environment of humans.

Authors:  John R Speakman; Jaap Keijer
Journal:  Mol Metab       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 7.422

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of Various IVC Systems According to Mouse Reproductive Performance and Husbandry and Environmental Parameters.

Authors:  Mitchel G Stover; Jason S Villano
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 1.706

2.  A multicentre study on spontaneous in-cage activity and micro-environmental conditions of IVC housed C57BL/6J mice during consecutive cycles of bi-weekly cage-change.

Authors:  B Ulfhake; H Lerat; J Honetschlager; K Pernold; M Rynekrová; K Escot; C Recordati; R V Kuiper; G Rosati; M Rigamonti; S Zordan; J-B Prins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.