Literature DB >> 28313491

Lack of compensatory growth under phosphorus deficiency in grazing-adapted grasses from the Serengeti Plains.

F S Chapin1,2, S J McNaughton1,2.   

Abstract

Two shortgrass species (Sporobolus ioclados and Eustachys paspaloides) and two midgrass species (E. paspaloides and Pennisetum mezianum) from the Serengeti grasslands of Tanzania were grown under conditions of extreme phosphorus (P) deficiency. Production of each of these species is maintained or enhanced by defoliation under adequate nutrient supply (McNaughton et al. 1983). However, under the P-deficient conditions of our experiment, defoliation caused a reduction in biomass of all plant parts of each species. Green leaf biomass was reduced most strongly by defoliation, and crowns were least affected. Yield of biomass and nutrients to grazers (green leaves+clipped material) was enhanced by weekly defoliation in the shortgrass grazing-adapted species, whereas yield to producers (live biomass and nutrients retained by the plant) and yield to decomposers (litter) were strongly reduced by defoliation in all species. Phosphate absorption capacity (V max) measured on excised roots was enhanced by defoliation in the grazing-adapted Sporobolus, but, due to low affinity (high K m) of roots of defoliated plants for phosphate, absorption rate was not greatly altered at low solution concentrations. Phosphate absorption capacity was reduced or unaffected by defoliation in other species. We conclude that under conditions of P deficiency, plants are unable to acquire the nutrients necessary to replenish large nutrient losses to grazers. In low-nutrient environments, compensatory growth (stimulation of production by grazing) is not a viable strategy. Therefore, in these environments plants respond evolutionarily to herbivores by developing chemical or morphological defenses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compensatory growth; Defoliation; Nutrient deficiency; Phosphate uptake; Serengeti

Year:  1989        PMID: 28313491     DOI: 10.1007/BF00378674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics.

Authors:  G N WILKINSON
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1961-08       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Serengeti migratory wildebeest: facilitation of energy flow by grazing.

Authors:  S J McNaughton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-01-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Responses of an African graminoid (Themeda triandra Forsk.) to frequent defoliation, nitrogen, and water: a limit of adaptation to herbivory.

Authors:  M B Coughenour; S J McNaughton; L L Wallace
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The effects of clipping and fertilization on nitrogen nutrition and allocation by mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal Panicum coloratum L., a C4 grass.

Authors:  L L Wallace; S J McNaughton; M B Coughenour
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Annual replacement of the tillers of Agropyron desertorum following grazing.

Authors:  B E Olson; J H Richards
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The effects of clipping, nitrogen source and nitrogen concentration on the growth responses and nitrogen uptake of an east african sedge.

Authors:  R W Ruess; S J McNaughton; M B Coughenour
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Responses of an African tall-grass (Hyparrhenia filipendula stapf.) to defoliation and limitations of water and nitrogen.

Authors:  M B Coughenour; S J McNaughton; L L Wallace
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.225

  7 in total
  13 in total

1.  Influences of chronic and current season grazing by collared pikas on above-ground biomass and species richness in subarctic alpine meadows.

Authors:  Eliot J B McIntire; David S Hik
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Ecological conditions that determine when grazing stimulates grass production.

Authors:  Nicholas J Georgiadis; Roger W Ruess; Samuel J McNaughton; David Western
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effect of stress and time for recovery on the amount of compensatory growth after grazing.

Authors:  M Oesterheld; S J McNaughton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Effect of defoliation intensity on aboveground and belowground relative growth rates.

Authors:  M Oesterheld
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Performance and allocation patterns of the perennial herb, Plantago lanceolata, in response to simulated herbivory and elevated CO2 environments.

Authors:  E D Fajer; M D Bowers; F A Bazzaz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The relationships between relative growth rate, meristematic potential and compensatory growth of semiarid-land shrubs.

Authors:  J L Wandera; J H Richards; R J Mueller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Biomass allocation and leaf chemical defence in defoliated seedlings of Quercus serrata with respect to carbon-nitrogen balance.

Authors:  Kouki Hikosaka; Teruyuki Takashima; Daisuke Kabeya; Tadaki Hirose; Naoto Kamata
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Rhizosphere interactions, carbon allocation, and nitrogen acquisition of two perennial North American grasses in response to defoliation and elevated atmospheric CO2.

Authors:  David J Augustine; Feike A Dijkstra; E William Hamilton Iii; Jack A Morgan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Forage quality in relation to long-term grazing history, current-year defoliation, and water resource.

Authors:  D G Milchunas; A S Varnamkhasti; W K Lauenroth; H Goetz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Phosphorus reserves increase grass regrowth after defoliation.

Authors:  Mariano Oyarzabal; Martín Oesterheld
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.