Literature DB >> 28312033

Effect of stress and time for recovery on the amount of compensatory growth after grazing.

M Oesterheld1, S J McNaughton1.   

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that the amount of compensatory growth after defoliation is affected by the level of stress at which plants grow when defoliated and by the length of time for recovery. Growth response to defoliation went from partial compensation when plants were growing at high relative growth rates (RGR) to overcompensation when plants were more stressed and growing at low RGR. Defoliation released plants from the limitation imposed by the accumulation of old and dead tissue and this release overrode the negative effect of biomass loss. Compensatory growth resulted from a higher RGR aboveground that was not associated with a reduction in RGR belowground. Time available for recovery had a major impact on the outcome of defoliation. With a short time for recovery, RGR was decreased by defoliation because an immediate increase in net assimilation rate was overridden by a reduction in the ratio of leaf area to plant weight. After defoliation, this ratio increased quickly due to a larger allocation to leaf growth and lower leaf specific weights, resulting in higher RGR. We conclude that the compensatory response to grazing depends on the type and level of stress limiting growth. Allocation and physiological responses to stress may positively or negatively affect the response to grazing and, simultaneously, grazing may alleviate or aggravate the effects of different types of stress.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allocation; Briza; Grazing; Growth; Stress

Year:  1991        PMID: 28312033     DOI: 10.1007/BF00320604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense.

Authors:  P D Coley; J P Bryant; F S Chapin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Ecological conditions that determine when grazing stimulates grass production.

Authors:  Nicholas J Georgiadis; Roger W Ruess; Samuel J McNaughton; David Western
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effects of plant growth rate and leaf lifetime on the amount and type of anti-herbivore defense.

Authors:  P D Coley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Intraspecific variation in the response of Themeda triandra to defoliation: the effect of time of recovery and growth rates on compensatory growth.

Authors:  M Oesterheld; S J McNaughton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Relative growth rates and the grazing optimization hypothesis.

Authors:  D W Hilbert; D M Swift; J K Detling; M I Dyer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Coping with herbivory: Photosynthetic capacity and resource allocation in two semiarid Agropyron bunchgrasses.

Authors:  M M Caldwell; J H Richards; D A Johnson; R S Nowak; R S Dzurec
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The effect of clipping frequency on the competitive interaction between two perennial grass species.

Authors:  K I Alexander; K Thompson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Lack of compensatory growth under phosphorus deficiency in grazing-adapted grasses from the Serengeti Plains.

Authors:  F S Chapin; S J McNaughton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Herbivory tolerance of Agropyron smithii populations with different grazing histories.

Authors:  H W Polley; J K Detling
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.225

  9 in total
  18 in total

1.  Differences in the compensatory growth of two co-occurring grass species in relation to water availability.

Authors:  Marja A van Staalduinen; Niels P R Anten
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Influences of chronic and current season grazing by collared pikas on above-ground biomass and species richness in subarctic alpine meadows.

Authors:  Eliot J B McIntire; David S Hik
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Will increases in atmospheric CO2 affect regrowth following grazing in C4 grasses from tropical grasslands? A test with Sporobolus kentrophyllus.

Authors:  Brian J Wilsey; Samuel J McNaughton; James S Coleman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Evidence for the promotion of aboveground grassland production by native large herbivores in Yellowstone National Park.

Authors:  Douglas A Frank; Samuel J McNaughton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Effect of defoliation intensity on aboveground and belowground relative growth rates.

Authors:  M Oesterheld
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Interactive effect of flooding and grazing on the growth of Serengeti grasses.

Authors:  M Oesterheld; S J McNaughton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Effects of simulated herbivory on tillering and reproduction in an annual ryegrass,Lolium remotum.

Authors:  P Mutikainen; M Walls; A Ojala
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Cotton compensatory growth after loss of reproductive organs as affected by availability of resources and duration of recovery period.

Authors:  Víctor O Sadras
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Tradeoff between height and relative growth rate in a dominant grass from the Serengeti ecosystem.

Authors:  G Hartvigsen; S J McNaughton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Flowering phenology and compensation for herbivory in Ipomopsis aggregata.

Authors:  Rachael S Freeman; Alison K Brody; Christopher D Neefus
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.