Literature DB >> 28313193

Island-sharing by archipelago species.

Alan Roberts1, Lewis Stone2.   

Abstract

Diamond (1975) formulated "assembly rules" for avian species on islands in an archipelago, which made a successful colonisation depend essentially on which other species were present. Critically examining these rules, Connor and Simberloff (1979) maintained that, in the Vanuatu (New Hebrides) archipelago, the field data on species distribution was quite compatible with a null hypothesis, in which species colonise at random with no species interaction. Their work was in turn criticised (Diamond and Gilpin (1982), Gilpin and Diamond (1982)) and a vigorous controversy has ensued.Here we contribute a method in which a simple but hitherto neglected statistic is used as a probe: the number of islands shared by a pair of species, with its first and second moments. The matrix of these sharing values is given as a simple product of the incidence matrix, and its properties are examined - first, for the field data, and then in the random ensemble used by Connor and Simberloff (1979). It is shown that their constraints hold constant the mean number shared, so that any fall in the number that one pair of species share, due to their excluding each other, must imply a rise in the number shared by some other species pair-i.e., an aggregation.Turning to the second moment of the numbers shared, it is shown that its value in the Vanuatu field data exceeds the largest value to be found in a sample of 1000 matrices, these latter being constructed so that they obey the Connor and Simberloff constraints but are otherwise random. This indicates that exclusion and/or aggregation effects are present in the actual distribution of species, which are not catered for by the null hypothesis.The observed distribution thus emerges as much more exceptional than found by Connor and Simberloff (1979), and even by Diamond and Gilpin (1982), when examining the same ensemble. The reason for this disagreement are sought, and some cautions are offered, supported by numerical evidence, concerning the use of the chi-square test when the data points involved are mutually dependent.

Keywords:  Bird distributions; Community structure; Species co-occurrence; Testing significance

Year:  1990        PMID: 28313193     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Comments on Wilson's Null Model.

Authors:  M E Gilpin; J M Diamond
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Methods for detecting non-randomness in species co-occurrences: a contribution.

Authors:  J B Wilson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Factors contributing to non-randomness in species Co-occurrences on Islands.

Authors:  Michael E Gilpin; Jared M Diamond
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Examination of the "null" model of connor and simberloff for species co-occurrences on Islands.

Authors:  Jared M Diamond; Michael E Gilpin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Hypothesis testing in ecology: psychological aspects and the importance of theory maturation.

Authors:  C Loehle
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.875

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Competitive exclusion, or species aggregation? : An aid in deciding.

Authors:  Lewi Stone; Alan Roberts
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The checkerboard score and species distributions.

Authors:  Lewi Stone; Alan Roberts
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  networksis: A Package to Simulate Bipartite Graphs with Fixed Marginals Through Sequential Importance Sampling.

Authors:  Ryan Admiraal; Mark S Handcock
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 6.440

4.  Regime shifts in the anthropocene: drivers, risks, and resilience.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Rocha; Garry D Peterson; Reinette Biggs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.