Literature DB >> 28313153

Prey size, prey perishability and group foraging in a social spider.

Ann L Rypstra1, R Scott Tirey1.   

Abstract

Selection might favor group foraging and social feeding when prey are distributed in patches that do not last long enough for a solitary individual to consume more than a small fraction of them (Pulliam and Millikan 1982; Pulliam and Caraco 1984). Here we considered the foraging behavior of a social spider, Anelosimus eximius, in light of this ephemeral resource hypothesis. This species builds large webs in which members cooperate to capture a wide variety of different sizes and types of prey, many of which are very large. The capture success of this species was very high across all prey sizes, presumably due to the fact that they foraged in groups. Group consumption times in natural colonies for all prey larger than five mm were less than the time that dead insects remained on the plastic sheets that we used as artificial webs. Solitary consumption estimates, calculated from the rate at which laboratory individuals extracted insect biomass while feeding, were the same as the residence times of insects on artificial webs in the field for insects between 6 and 15 mm in length and were significantly longer than the persistence of insects on plastic sheets for all larger insects. Large prey, that contribute substantially to colony energy supplies, appeared to be ephemeral resources for these spiders that could not be consumed by a single spider in the time they were available. These factors made the food intake of one spider in a group less sensitive to scavenging by others and could act to reinforce the social system of this species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anelosimus; Ephemeral food; Group foraging; Large prey; Social spiders

Year:  1991        PMID: 28313153     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  3 in total

1.  The "ricochet effect" and prey capture in colonial spiders.

Authors:  George W Uetz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  ANELOSIMUS STUDIOSUS (ARANEAE: THERIDIIDAE) AND THE EVOLUTION OF QUASISOCIALITY IN THERIDIID SPIDERS.

Authors:  Vincent Brach
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Games between relatives.

Authors:  W G Hines; J M Smith
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1979-07-07       Impact factor: 2.691

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  How within-group behavioural variation and task efficiency enhance fitness in a social group.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Susan E Riechert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Predictors of colony extinction vary by habitat type in social spiders.

Authors:  Brendan L McEwen; James L L Lichtenstein; David N Fisher; Colin M Wright; Greg T Chism; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Benefits of Group Living Include Increased Feeding Efficiency and Lower Mass Loss during Desiccation in the Social and Inbreeding Spider Stegodyphus dumicola.

Authors:  Bram Vanthournout; Michelle Greve; Anne Bruun; Jesper Bechsgaard; Johannes Overgaard; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Benefits of Group Foraging Depend on Prey Type in a Small Marine Predator, the Little Penguin.

Authors:  Grace J Sutton; Andrew J Hoskins; John P Y Arnould
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cooperative foraging expands dietary niche but does not offset intra-group competition for resources in social spiders.

Authors:  Marija Majer; Christina Holm; Yael Lubin; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.