Literature DB >> 28312508

Interactions between fish and salamander larvae : Costs of predator avoidance or competition?

R D Semlitsch1.   

Abstract

Two species of salamander larvae (Ambystoma talpoideum and A. maculatum) were reared separately in the presence and absence of a fish (Lepomis macrochirus) in artificial ponds to measure the effects of a predator on the growth, survival, diet, and activity of larvae. The presence of L. macrochirus reduced body sizes of larvae by 18% in A. talpoideum and by 16% in A. maculatum. L. macrochirus apparently preyed on the smallest individuals. Survival in the presence of L. macrochirus decreased by 61% in A. talpoideum and by 97% in A. maculatum compared with larvae reared alone. Species identity did not significantly effect body size or survival, but an interaction effect suggested that A. maculatum was more severely affected by predators than was A. talpodeum. Activity of larvae in the water column was dramatically reduced in the presence of L. macrochirus, when larvae were restricted to the leaf litter of the benthic zone. There was overlap in the diets of fish and salamander larvae. Larvae reared in the presence of fish, however, consumed different taxa of prey as well as reduced number of prey compared to larvae reared alone. A. talpoideum larvae were more nocturnal than diurnal in the absence of fish, whereas A. maculatum larvae were equally active day and night. This experiment suggests that predator-prey relationships can change with shifts in species attributes and potentially confound apparent costs of predator avoidance with competition. Measuring the long-term dynamics of the cost-benefit relationship will help elucidate how prey balance the demands of their life history with the demands of predators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activity; Ambystoma; Growth; Habitat shift; Predator avoidance

Year:  1987        PMID: 28312508     DOI: 10.1007/BF00378972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Reverse diel vertical migration: an escape from invertebrate predators.

Authors:  M D Ohman; B W Frost; E B Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands?

Authors:  A Sih
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Predator-prey relationships among larval dragonflies, salamanders, and frogs.

Authors:  J P Caldwell; J H Thorp; T O Jervey
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  ADAPTIVE CHANGES IN ANTIPREDATOR BEHAVIOR OF A GRASSHOPPER DURING DEVELOPMENT.

Authors:  Jack C Schultz
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Diet shifts in moose due to predator avoidance.

Authors:  Joan Edwards
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The effect of the predator-avoidance behavior of the sea urchin, Centrostephanus coronatus, on the breadth of its diet.

Authors:  R R Vance; R J Schmitt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Reproductive strategy of a facultatively paedomorphic salamander Ambystoma talpoideum.

Authors:  Raymond D Semlitsch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.225

  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  Resource-mediated impact of spider predation risk on performance in the grasshopper Ageneotettix deorum (Orthoptera: Acrididae).

Authors:  Bradford J Danner; Anthony Joern
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Life history plasticity does not confer resilience to environmental change in the mole salamander (Ambystoma talpoideum).

Authors:  Courtney L Davis; David A W Miller; Susan C Walls; William J Barichivich; Jeffrey Riley; Mary E Brown
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Causes of larval drift of the fire salamander, Salamandra salamandra terrestris, and its effects on population dynamics.

Authors:  Burkhard Thiesmeier; Helmut Schuhmacher
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Predation risk and the structure of freshwater zooplankton communities.

Authors:  Craig E Williamson; Mark E Stoeckel; L Jane Schoeneck
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Predation and the evolution of complex oviposition behaviour in Amazon rainforest frogs.

Authors:  William E Magnusson; Jean-Marc Hero
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Resource heterogeneity and community structure: A case study inHeliconia imbricata Phytotelmata.

Authors:  Shahid Naeem
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Direct effects influence larval salamander size and density more than indirect effects.

Authors:  Thomas L Anderson; Brittany H Ousterhout; Freya E Rowland; Dana L Drake; Jacob J Burkhart; William E Peterman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Differential vulnerability to predation and refuge use in competing larval salamanders.

Authors:  Susan C Walls
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Predator induced phenotypic plasticity in the pinewoods tree frog, Hyla femoralis: necessary cues and the cost of development.

Authors:  Emily May LaFiandra; Kimberly J Babbitt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 3.225

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.