Literature DB >> 33387008

Direct effects influence larval salamander size and density more than indirect effects.

Thomas L Anderson1,2, Brittany H Ousterhout3, Freya E Rowland3,4, Dana L Drake3,5, Jacob J Burkhart3, William E Peterman3,6.   

Abstract

Direct and indirect effects both influence population and community dynamics. The relative strengths of these pathways are often compared using experimental approaches, but their evaluation in situ has been less frequent. We examined how individual and aggregate impacts of direct and indirect effects of species densities, proxies for competition and predation pressure, and habitat variables influenced patterns of larval density and body size of ringed (Ambystoma annulatum) and spotted salamanders (A. maculatum). We surveyed > 150 ponds in Missouri, USA, from 2012 to 2014 to measure the density and body size of each focal species, the density of co-occurring pond food web members, and select habitat features. We used structural equation modeling to quantify the relative importance of direct and indirect pathways on both body size and larval density. Overall, both responses were explained through a combination of direct and indirect effects. However, the magnitudes of direct effects were often greater than indirect effects. Some of the direct and indirect relationships with larval salamander size and density were also consistent with results from experimental studies. Finally, total direct and indirect effects were often weaker due to habitat and density variables negating each other's impacts. Overall, our study shows that direct effects were equivalent to, or more important than, indirect effects. We also demonstrate that the effects stemming from individual relationships can sum to produce net patterns that are negligible in magnitude. Further work on direct and indirect effects with observational data are needed to examine their magnitudes in natural communities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Competition; Interaction chain; Mediation; Pond; Predation; Structural equation modeling

Year:  2021        PMID: 33387008     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-020-04820-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  23 in total

1.  Predicted climate change alters the indirect effect of predators on an ecosystem process.

Authors:  Janet R Lensing; David H Wise
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Direct and indirect effects of resource quality on food web structure.

Authors:  Tibor Bukovinszky; F J Frank van Veen; Yde Jongema; Marcel Dicke
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: does method really matter?

Authors:  Andrew F Hayes; Michael Scharkow
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-08-16

4.  Evaluating consumptive and nonconsumptive predator effects on prey density using field time-series data.

Authors:  J A Marino; S D Peacor; D B Bunnell; H A Vanderploeg; S A Pothoven; A K Elgin; J R Bence; J Jiao; E L Ionides
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities.

Authors:  R D Holt
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Experimental studies on direct and indirect interactions in a three trophic-level stream system.

Authors:  Chifu Huang; Andrew Sih
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Warming modifies trophic cascades and eutrophication in experimental freshwater communities.

Authors:  Pavel Kratina; Hamish S Greig; Patrick L Thompson; Ticiana S A Carvalho-Pereira; Jonathan B Shurin
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  Consumers mediate the effects of experimental ocean acidification and warming on primary producers.

Authors:  Christian Alsterberg; Johan S Eklöf; Lars Gamfeldt; Jonathan N Havenhand; Kristina Sundbäck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Top predators and habitat complexity alter an intraguild predation module in pond communities.

Authors:  Thomas L Anderson; Raymond D Semlitsch
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Nonconsumptive effects of a predator weaken then rebound over time.

Authors:  David L Kimbro; Jonathan H Grabowski; A Randall Hughes; Michael F Piehler; J Wilson White
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.499

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.