Literature DB >> 28306980

Differential vulnerability to predation and refuge use in competing larval salamanders.

Susan C Walls1.   

Abstract

The aquatic larvae of two species of salamanders coexist as a result of differences in their competitive abilities: Ambystoma talpoideum is a superior aggressor, whereas A. maculatum is a superior forager. I examined the behavioral mechanisms that permit these species to coexist with their predatory congener, A. opacum. I asked whether the two prey species differ in their vulnerability to predation and in their use of structural and spatial refugia when under the risk of predation; such inter-specific variation may allow predation to contribute indirectly to prey coexistence. Larval A. maculatum (the superior forager) was more vulnerable to predation by A. opacum than was A. talpoideum, and only the latter species significantly increased its use of structural refugia (leaf litter) in the presence of the predator. In pond enclosures, both species of prey exhibited diel patterns of microhabitat use; significantly more larvae occupied shallow regions of enclosures during the day and migrated to deeper water (a spatial refugium) at night. However, when considered separately, neither (1) the presence of a predatory larval A. opacum nor (2) an increased density of intra- and interspecific competitors significantly altered this habitat shift for either prey species. Rather, diel microhabitat usage in A. talpoideum was significantly affected by an interaction between predator presence and competitor density. My results demonstrate the importance of refugia to coexistence in this predator-prey assemblage. Furthermore, predation by A. opacum may mediate prey competition; that is, preferential consumption of A. maculatum may reduce the competitive impact of this superior forager on A. talpoideum, thus enhancing their coexistence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambystoma; Coexistence; Microhabitat use Predation; Refugia

Year:  1995        PMID: 28306980     DOI: 10.1007/BF00328904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity.

Authors:  E E Werner; B R Anholt
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Predatory salamanders reverse the outcome of competition among three species of anuran tadpoles.

Authors:  P J Morin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-06-12       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Control of a desert-grassland transition by a keystone rodent guild.

Authors:  J H Brown; E J Heske
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-12-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Competition between ant species: outcome controlled by parasitic flies.

Authors:  D H Feener
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-11-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Effect of microhabitat on fitness components of larval tiger salamanders, Ambystoma tigrinum nebulosum.

Authors:  J R Holomuzki
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  An examination of multiple factors affecting community structure in an aquatic amphibian community.

Authors:  Spencer A Cortwright; Craig E Nelson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Predator avoidance, microhabitat shift, and risk-sensitive foraging in larval dragonflies.

Authors:  C L Pierce
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Interactions between fish and salamander larvae : Costs of predator avoidance or competition?

Authors:  R D Semlitsch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.225

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Temporally auto-correlated predator attacks structure ecological communities.

Authors:  Sebastian J Schreiber
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.812

2.  Selective Predation by Pond-Breeding Salamanders in Ephemeral Wetlands of Ohio and Illinois.

Authors:  Brock P Struecker; Joseph R Milanovich; Mollie McIntosh; Martin B Berg; Matthew E Hopton
Journal:  J Herpetol       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 1.430

3.  Variation in phenology and density differentially affects predator-prey interactions between salamanders.

Authors:  Thomas L Anderson; Freya E Rowland; Raymond D Semlitsch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.225

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.