Literature DB >> 28310885

Foraging in male bumblebees (Bombus lucorum L.): maximizing energy or minimizing water load?

Andreas Bertsch1.   

Abstract

The O2, CO2, and H2O exchange of single flying male bumblebees (Bombus lucorum and B. terrestris) were measured simultaneously. A respiratory quotient RQ=1 was found for all activities investigated (torpor-flight). The dependence of respiratory CO2 production in flight on body-weight was measured: for a 220-mg male bumblebee it amounts to 24.5 mg CO2/h (=56.4 ml O2/g·h). The corresponding evaporative water loss amounts to 6 mg H2O/h. Males tranferred to a climatic test chamber and conditioned to artificial flower feeders started to fly, after a few days of acclimatization, in typical scent-marked flight-paths. The daily pattern of flight activity was recorded: the mean total time in flight amounts to 244 min, and the corresponding daily flight length is about 17 km. At 20°C and 50% relative humidity (RH) a daily uptake of 180 μl (≙ 220mg) of 50% sugar solution was measured, equal to the mean body weight of the male bumblebees. Since the body weight remains constant on consecutive days a 24-h energy- and water-budget could be calculated. The energy-budget is balanced; the activities observed can be fuelled with the sugar available. About 70% of the energy is used for the 4 h of flight activity. With the daily nectar volume 110 mg of water is ingested; in the oxidation of 110 mg sugar, 66 mg of metabolic water is produced and 40 mg water is dissipated by the evaporative water-loss. Thus, to have a balanced water-budget, 136 mg of water must be voided in 24 h, which equals the total body-water of the bumblebees. Nectar is a nutrient of high water content which not only provides the sugar necessary for activity but also, in most circumstances, an excess of water. The effect of this high water load in limiting daily activity is discussed and compared with the water- and osmoregulation of hummingbirds. The strategy of maximizing energy for a male bumblebee must be one of minimizing water load.

Entities:  

Year:  1984        PMID: 28310885     DOI: 10.1007/BF00384264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  [Not Available].

Authors:  A HAAS
Journal:  Z Vgl Physiol       Date:  1949

2.  Nectar production of Epilobium angustifolium L. at different air humidities; nectar sugar in individual flowers and the optimal foraging theory.

Authors:  A Bertsch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  [Comparative studies on the pairing swarm in bumblebees (Bombus) and parasitic bumblebees (Psithyrus). I].

Authors:  A Haas
Journal:  Z Tierpsychol       Date:  1967-09

4.  Optimal foraging in bumblebees: calculation of net rate of energy intake and optimal patch choice.

Authors:  G H Pyke
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  DIFFUSION IN INSECT WING MUSCLE, THE MOST ACTIVE TISSUE KNOWN.

Authors:  T WEIS-FOGH
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1964-06       Impact factor: 3.312

  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  Interpreting patterns of resource utilization: randomness and selectivity in pollen feeding by adult hoverflies.

Authors:  J R Haslett
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Effects of nectar concentration and flower depth on flower handling efficiency of bumble bees.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The role of insect water balance in pollination ecology: Xylocopa and Calotropis.

Authors:  P G Willmer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Competition for bumblebee visitation between Melampyrum pratense and Viscaria vulgaris with healthy and Ustilago-infected flowers.

Authors:  Ola Jennersten; Manja M Kwak
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The neonicotinoid pesticide, imidacloprid, affects Bombus impatiens (bumblebee) sonication behavior when consumed at doses below the LD50.

Authors:  Callin M Switzer; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Space use of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) revealed by radio-tracking.

Authors:  Melanie Hagen; Martin Wikelski; W Daniel Kissling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Information needs at the beginning of foraging: grass-cutting ants trade off load size for a faster return to the nest.

Authors:  Martin Bollazzi; Flavio Roces
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Raising the sugar content--orchid bees overcome the constraints of suction feeding through manipulation of nectar and pollen provisions.

Authors:  Tamara Pokorny; Klaus Lunau; Thomas Eltz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Possible Synergistic Effects of Thymol and Nicotine Against Crithidia bombi Parasitism in Bumble Bees.

Authors:  Olivia Masi Biller; Lynn S Adler; Rebecca E Irwin; Caitlin McAllister; Evan C Palmer-Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.