Literature DB >> 28310495

Why do sulfate-reducing bacteria outcompete methanogenic bacteria for substrates?

J K Kristjansson1, P Schönheit2.   

Abstract

The apparent Ks values for H2 of several phylogenetically distant strains of both methanogenic bacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria were measured. The sulfate reducers had Ks values of about 2 μM whereas the Ks values of the methanogens were 6-20 μM. This indicates that probably all sulfate-reducing bacteria have a higher substrate affinity for H2 than the methanogenic bacteria. Difference in substrate affinity can thus account for the inhibition of methanogenesis from H2 and CO2 in sulfate-rich ecosystems (mainly saltwater marshes), where the H2 concentration is well below 5 μM. Possible explanations for this general phenomenon are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  1983        PMID: 28310495     DOI: 10.1007/BF00379530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  18 in total

1.  Methanogenesis and sulfate reduction: competitive and noncompetitive substrates in estuarine sediments.

Authors:  R S Oremland; S Polcin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Kinetics of hydrogen consumption by rumen fluid, anaerobic digestor sludge, and sediment.

Authors:  J A Robinson; J M Tiedje
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Carbon and electron flow in mud and sandflat intertidal sediments at delaware inlet, nelson, new zealand.

Authors:  D O Mountfort; R A Asher; E L Mays; J M Tiedje
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Sulfate reducers can outcompete methanogens at freshwater sulfate concentrations.

Authors:  D R Lovley; M J Klug
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Growth yields and growth rates of Desulfovibrio vulgaris (Marburg) growing on hydrogen plus sulfate and hydrogen plus thiosulfate as the sole energy sources.

Authors:  W Badziong; R K Thauer
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1978-05-30       Impact factor: 2.552

Review 6.  Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group.

Authors:  W E Balch; G E Fox; L J Magrum; C R Woese; R S Wolfe
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1979-06

7.  Separation of hydrogenase from intact cells of Desulfovibrio vulgaris. Purification and properties.

Authors:  H M van der Westen; S G Mayhew; C Veeger
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1978-02-01       Impact factor: 4.124

8.  Inhibition of methanogenesis by sulphate reducing bacteria competing for transferred hydrogen.

Authors:  J W Abram; D B Nedwell
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1978-04-27       Impact factor: 2.552

9.  Effect of sulfate on carbon and electron flow during microbial methanogenesis in freshwater sediments.

Authors:  M R Winfrey; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  The isolation of a hexaheme cytochrome from Desulfovibrio desulfuricans and its identification as a new type of nitrite reductase.

Authors:  M C Liu; H D Peck
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1981-12-25       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  8 in total

1.  Bacterial association observations in Lucilia sericata and Lucilia cuprina organs through 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Authors:  N E Gasz; M J Geary; S L Doggett; M L Harvey
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Microbial Community Structure and Functions in Ethanol-Fed Sulfate Removal Bioreactors for Treatment of Mine Water.

Authors:  Malin Bomberg; Jarno Mäkinen; Marja Salo; Mona Arnold
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2017-09-20

3.  Reduction in Methane Emissions From Acidified Dairy Slurry Is Related to Inhibition of Methanosarcina Species.

Authors:  Jemaneh Habtewold; Robert Gordon; Vera Sokolov; Andrew VanderZaag; Claudia Wagner-Riddle; Kari Dunfield
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 4.  Hydrogen cross-feeders of the human gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Nick W Smith; Paul R Shorten; Eric H Altermann; Nicole C Roy; Warren C McNabb
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2018-12-18

5.  Methanogenesis and Salt Tolerance Genes of a Novel Halophilic Methanosarcinaceae Metagenome-Assembled Genome from a Former Solar Saltern.

Authors:  Clifton P Bueno de Mesquita; Jinglie Zhou; Susanna M Theroux; Susannah G Tringe
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Organohalide respiration potential in marine sediments from Aarhus Bay.

Authors:  Chen Zhang; Siavash Atashgahi; Tom N P Bosma; Peng Peng; Hauke Smidt
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.519

7.  Long-Term Rewetting of Three Formerly Drained Peatlands Drives Congruent Compositional Changes in Pro- and Eukaryotic Soil Microbiomes through Environmental Filtering.

Authors:  Micha Weil; Haitao Wang; Mia Bengtsson; Daniel Köhn; Anke Günther; Gerald Jurasinski; John Couwenberg; Wakene Negassa; Dominik Zak; Tim Urich
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-04-10

8.  Microbial drivers of methane emissions from unrestored industrial salt ponds.

Authors:  Jinglie Zhou; Susanna M Theroux; Clifton P Bueno de Mesquita; Wyatt H Hartman; Ye Tian; Susannah G Tringe
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 10.302

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.