Literature DB >> 16345535

Carbon and electron flow in mud and sandflat intertidal sediments at delaware inlet, nelson, new zealand.

D O Mountfort1, R A Asher, E L Mays, J M Tiedje.   

Abstract

An investigation of carbon and electron flow in mud and sandflat intertidal sediments showed that the terminal electron acceptor was principally sulfate and that the carbon flow was mainly to CO(2). Studies with thin layers of sediment exposed to H(2) showed that methane production accounted for virtually none of the H(2) utilized, whereas sulfate reduction accounted for a major proportion of the gas uptake. At all sampling sites except one (site B7), rates of methanogenesis were low but sulfate concentrations in the interstitial water were high (>18 mM). At site B7, the sulfate concentrations declined with depth from 32 mM at 2 cm to <1 mM at 10 cm or below, and active methanogenesis occurred in the low-sulfate zone. Sulfate-reducing activity at this site initially decreased and then increased with depth so that elevated rates occurred in both the active and nonactive methanogenic zones. The respiratory index (RI) [RI = CO(2)/(CO(2) + CH(4))] for [2-C]acetate catabolism at site B7 ranged from 0.98 to 0.2 in the depth range of 2 to 14 cm. Addition of sulfate to sediment from the low-sulfate zone resulted in an increase in RI and a decrease in methanogenesis. At all other sites examined, RI ranged from 0.97 to 0.99 and was constant with depth. The results suggested that although methanogenesis was inhibited by sulfate (presumably through the activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria), it was not always limited by sulfate reduction.

Entities:  

Year:  1980        PMID: 16345535      PMCID: PMC291405          DOI: 10.1128/aem.39.4.686-694.1980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  18 in total

1.  Kinetic parameters of the conversion of methane precursors to methane in a hypereutrophic lake sediment.

Authors:  R F Strayer; J M Tiedje
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Interrelations between sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria in bottom deposits of a fresh-water lake. I. Field observations.

Authors:  T E Cappenberg
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 2.271

Review 3.  Recent advances in the study of the sulfate-reducing bacteria.

Authors:  J R Postgate
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1965-12

4.  Nitrogen-fixing communities in an intertidal ecosystem.

Authors:  B B Bohlool; W J Wiebe
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Effect of inorganic sulfide on the growth and metabolism of Methanosarcina barkeri strain DM.

Authors:  D O Mountfort; R A Asher
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Inhibition of methanogenesis in salt marsh sediments and whole-cell suspensions of methanogenic bacteria by nitrogen oxides.

Authors:  W L Balderston; W J Payne
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Inhibition of methanogenesis by sulphate reducing bacteria competing for transferred hydrogen.

Authors:  J W Abram; D B Nedwell
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1978-04-27       Impact factor: 2.552

8.  Microbial methanogenesis and acetate metabolism in a meromictic lake.

Authors:  M R Winfrey; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Effect of sulfate on carbon and electron flow during microbial methanogenesis in freshwater sediments.

Authors:  M R Winfrey; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Changes in proportions of acetate and carbon dioxide used as methane precursors during the anaerobic digestion of bovine waste.

Authors:  D O Mountfort; R A Asher
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  36 in total

1.  Use of nitrifier activity measurements to estimate the efficiency of viable nitrifier counts in soils and sediments.

Authors:  L W Belser; E L Mays
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Metabolism of trimethylamine, choline, and glycine betaine by sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria in marine sediments.

Authors:  G M King
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Terminal processes in the anaerobic degradation of an algal-bacterial mat in a high-sulfate hot spring.

Authors:  D M Ward; G J Olson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Methanogenesis and sulfate reduction: competitive and noncompetitive substrates in estuarine sediments.

Authors:  R S Oremland; S Polcin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Metabolism of acetate, methanol, and methylated amines in intertidal sediments of lowes cove, maine.

Authors:  G M King; M J Klug; D R Lovley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Palladium-Mediated Hydrogenation of Unsaturated Hydrocarbons with Hydrogen Gas Released during Anaerobic Cellulose Degradation.

Authors:  D O Mountfort; H F Kaspar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Methanogenesis from Methylated Amines in a Hypersaline Algal Mat.

Authors:  Gary M King
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Kinetics of hydrogen consumption by rumen fluid, anaerobic digestor sludge, and sediment.

Authors:  J A Robinson; J M Tiedje
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Electron donors utilized by sulfate-reducing bacteria in eutrophic lake sediments.

Authors:  R L Smith; M J Klug
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Substrates for sulfate reduction and methane production in intertidal sediments.

Authors:  M R Winfrey; D M Ward
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.