Literature DB >> 16346154

Kinetics of hydrogen consumption by rumen fluid, anaerobic digestor sludge, and sediment.

J A Robinson1, J M Tiedje.   

Abstract

Michaelis-Menten kinetic parameters for H(2) consumption by three methanogenic habitats were determined from progress curve and initial velocity experiments. The influences of mass transfer resistance, endogenous H(2) production, and growth on apparent parameter estimates were also investigated. Kinetic parameters could not be determined for undiluted rumen fluid and some digestor sludge from gas-phase measurements of H(2), since mass transfer of H(2) across the gas-liquid interface was rate limiting. However, accurate values were obtained once the samples were diluted. H(2) consumption by digestor sludge with a long retention time and by hypereutrophic lake sediment was not phase transfer limited. The K(m) values for H(2) uptake by these habitats were similar, with means of 5.8, 6.0, and 7.1 muM for rumen fluid, digestor sludge, and sediment, respectively. V(max) estimates suggested a ratio of activity of approximately 100 (rumen fluid):10 (sludge):1 (sediment); their ranges were as follows: rumen fluid, 14 to 28 mM h; Holt sludge, 0.7 to 4.3 mM h; and Wintergreen sediment, 0.13 to 0.49 mM h. The principles of phase transfer limitation, studied here for H(2), are the same for all gaseous substrates and products. The limitations and errors associated with gas phase determination of kinetic parameters were evaluated with a mathematical model that combined mass transport and Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Three criteria are described which can be used to evaluate the possibility that a phase transfer limitation exists. If it does not exist, (i) substrate consumption curves are Michaelis-Menten and not first order, (ii) the K(m) is independent of initial substrate concentration, and (iii) the K(m) is independent of biomass (V(max)) and remains constant with dilution of sample. Errors in the Michaelis-Menten kinetic parameters are caused by endogenously produced H(2), but they were <15% for rumen fluid and 10% for lake sediment and digestor sludge. Increases in V(max) during the course of progress curve experiments were not great enough to produce systematic deviations from Michaelis-Menten kinetics.

Entities:  

Year:  1982        PMID: 16346154      PMCID: PMC242199          DOI: 10.1128/aem.44.6.1374-1384.1982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  18 in total

1.  The analysis of progress curves for enzyme-catalysed reactions by non-linear regression.

Authors:  R G Duggleby; J F Morrison
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1977-04-12

2.  The direct linear plot. A new graphical procedure for estimating enzyme kinetic parameters.

Authors:  R Eisenthal; A Cornish-Bowden
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  The relationship between methane production and concentrations of hydrogen in the aqueous and gaseous phases during rumen fermentation in vitro.

Authors:  J W Czerkawski; C G Harfoot; G Breckenridge
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1972-12

4.  Effect of mass transfer resistance on the Lineweaver-Burk plots for flocculating microorganisms.

Authors:  K F Ngian; S H Lin; W R Martin
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Metabolic interactions among intestinal microorganisms.

Authors:  M J Wolin
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Association of hydrogen metabolism with methanogenesis in Lake Mendota sediments.

Authors:  M R Winfrey; D R Nelson; S C Klevickis; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Kinetic parameters and relative turnovers of some important catabolic reactions in digesting sludge.

Authors:  H F Kaspar; K Wuhrmann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Hydrogen as a substrate for methanogenesis and sulphate reduction in anaerobic saltmarsh sediment.

Authors:  J W Abram; D B Nedwell
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1978-04-27       Impact factor: 2.552

9.  Inhibition of methanogenesis by sulphate reducing bacteria competing for transferred hydrogen.

Authors:  J W Abram; D B Nedwell
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1978-04-27       Impact factor: 2.552

10.  Formate as an intermediate in the bovine rumen fermentation.

Authors:  R E Hungate; W Smith; T Bauchop; I Yu; J C Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  31 in total

1.  An explicit solution for progress curve analysis in systems characterized by endogenous substrate production.

Authors:  Chetan T Goudar
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Kinetics of sulfate and hydrogen uptake by the thermophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria thermodesulfobacterium sp. Strain JSP and thermodesulfovibrio sp. Strain R1Ha3

Authors: 
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Influence of substituents on reductive dehalogenation of 3-chlorobenzoate analogs.

Authors:  J Dolfing; J M Tiedje
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Simultaneous estimation ofV max, K m, and the rate of endogenous substrate production (R) from substrate depletion data.

Authors:  J A Robinson; W G Characklis
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Liquid-to-Gas Mass Transfer in Anaerobic Processes: Inevitable Transfer Limitations of Methane and Hydrogen in the Biomethanation Process.

Authors:  A Pauss; G Andre; M Perrier; S R Guiot
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Product inhibition of butyrate metabolism by acetate and hydrogen in a thermophilic coculture.

Authors:  B K Ahring; P Westermann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Kinetics of microbial dehalogenation of haloaromatic substrates in methanogenic environments.

Authors:  J M Suflita; J A Robinson; J M Tiedje
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Production and Consumption of H(2) during Growth of Methanosarcina spp. on Acetate.

Authors:  D R Lovley; J G Ferry
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Kinetics of butyrate, acetate, and hydrogen metabolism in a thermophilic, anaerobic, butyrate-degrading triculture.

Authors:  B K Ahring; P Westermann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  The importance of hydrogen in landfill fermentations.

Authors:  M R Mormile; K R Gurijala; J A Robinson; M J McInerney; J M Suflita
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.