Literature DB >> 28309613

A comparative study of resource utilization in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

J A McKenzie1, S W McKechnie2.   

Abstract

Data were collected over four vintage seasons at the "Chateau Tahbilk" winery. The distribution of adults, larvae and pupae of D. melanogaster and D. simulans was recorded over a pile of grape residues during two different stages of its decomposition. Active fermentation characterized the first of these stages, but was much less apparent in the later stage. The distribution of adults was similar for both stages. However, while larvae and pupae of both species were observed in the post fermentation residues essentially only D. melanogaster larvae and pupae were present during the fermentation stage. During this stage larvae were aggregated beneath the surface to a depth of 10 cm. Here the average temperature was about 29°C and ethanol and acetic acid concentrations were around 7% (v/v) and 3% (v/v), respectively.Laboratory results allow a description of the physiological and behavioural responses of both species to ethanol or acetic acid concentration and to temperature differences. These results appear sufficient to explain the distribution of the species between and within the residue stages. However, before general statements of resource utilization or species interaction can be made, the need to study different stages of the life cycle is highlighted.

Entities:  

Year:  1979        PMID: 28309613     DOI: 10.1007/BF00345326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  15 in total

1.  Ecological differences and competitive interaction between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans in small laboratory populations.

Authors:  J S F Barker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Ethanol tolerance and the Adh polymorphism in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A McKenzie; S W McKechnie
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-03-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Ethanol: larval discrimination between two Drosophila sibling species.

Authors:  P A Parsons; S B King
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1977-07-15

4.  Genetic analysis of larval feeding behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D Sewell; B Burnet; K Connolly
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  The relationships of Drosophila obscura fallén and D. subobscura collin to naturally-occurring fruits.

Authors:  Michael Begon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Alcohol tolerance: An ecological parameter in the relative success of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  J A McKenzie; P A Parsons
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Larval reaction to alcohol as an indicator of resource utilization differences between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  P A Parsons
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Behavior genetics of olfactory responses in Drosophila. I. Olfactometry and strain differences in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Y Fuyama
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  Gene flow and selection in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A McKenzie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The comparative evolutionary biology of the sibling species, Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  P A Parsons
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 4.875

View more
  32 in total

1.  Evolution of gene expression and expression plasticity in long-term experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster maintained under constant and variable ethanol stress.

Authors:  Lev Y Yampolsky; Galina V Glazko; James D Fry
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  sn-Glycerol-3-phosphate oxidase and alcohol tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster larvae.

Authors:  S W McKechnie; B W Geer
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.890

3.  Pupation-temperature range in 12 Drosophila species from different ecological backgrounds.

Authors:  E M Schnebel; J Grossfield
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1986-06-15

4.  Genetic variation at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster in relation to environmental variation: Ethanol levels in breeding sites and allozyme frequencies.

Authors:  J B Gibson; T W May; A V Wilks
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Acetic acid activates distinct taste pathways in Drosophila to elicit opposing, state-dependent feeding responses.

Authors:  Anita V Devineni; Bei Sun; Anna Zhukovskaya; Richard Axel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 6.  Evolutionary genetics of the Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase gene-enzyme system.

Authors:  P W Heinstra
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Olfactory responses to alcohols by adults of sympatric populations of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  M H Soliman; M L Knight
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Elucidating the behavioral phenotype of Drosophila melanogaster larvae: correlations between larval foraging strategies and pupation height.

Authors:  M B Sokolowski; R I Hansell
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  Chemical stimuli in host-habitat location byLeptopilina heterotoma (Thomson) (Hymenoptera: Eucoilidae), a parasite ofDrosophila.

Authors:  M Dicke; J C Van Lenteren; G J Boskamp; E van Dongen-van Leeuwen
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Genotype-environment interaction for total fitness in Drosophila.

Authors:  James D Fry
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.