Literature DB >> 28307067

Alcohol tolerance: An ecological parameter in the relative success of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.

J A McKenzie1, P A Parsons1.   

Abstract

Laboratory experiments have shown D. melanogaster adults to be more tolerant to alcohol in the environment than D. simulans, with the females being more tolerant than the males of their species. Larval development on alcohol supplemented media also demonstrated an increased tolerance by D. melanogaster although the effect was not as clear cut as for the adult survival. Oviposition choice experiments demonstrated a marked rejection of alcohol impregnated laying sites by D. simulans when compared to standard medium sites. D. melanogaster showed a slight preference for alcohol supplemented sites.Collections in the maturation cellar of a vineyard produced, with the exception of a single D. simulans fly, entirely D. melanogaster adults while larvae and pupae from the cellar were also all D. melanogaster. Away from the alcohol resource, outside the cellar, both species were collected with D. simulans being the more common. However, the outside distribution of the two species was affected by alcohol fumes during vintage, as was the distribution of the sexes of D. melanogaster, with the more tolerant species or sex being closer to the source. The field results were thus in agreement with the laboratory predictions that D. melanogaster is better able to utilize an alcohol resource than D. simulans.

Entities:  

Year:  1972        PMID: 28307067     DOI: 10.1007/BF00345738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Competition Between Drosophila Melanogaster and Drosophila Simulans: II. The Improvement of Competitive Ability Through Selection.

Authors:  J A Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1952-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Ecological differences and competitive interaction between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans in small laboratory populations.

Authors:  J S F Barker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Multiple forms of drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase. 3. Conversion of one form to another by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide or acetone.

Authors:  K B Jacobson; J B Murphy; J A Knopp; J R Ortiz
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 4.013

4.  Modes of variation in alcohol dehydrogenase in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J B Gibson; R Miklovich
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1971-01-15

5.  STUDIES ON NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA VI. COMPETITION BETWEEN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER AND DROSOPHILA SIMULANS.

Authors:  A O Tantawy; M H Soliman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 3.694

  5 in total
  57 in total

1.  Preference for ethanol in Drosophila melanogaster associated with the alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism.

Authors:  D Cavener
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  Relationship between larval feeding behavior and viability in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  S Ohnishi
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  Oviposition site preference in Drosophila.

Authors:  R C Richmond; J L Gerking
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Genetic variation for oviposition behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Oviposition preferences and differential survival.

Authors:  W van Delden; A Kamping
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Genetic variation at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster in relation to environmental variation: Ethanol levels in breeding sites and allozyme frequencies.

Authors:  J B Gibson; T W May; A V Wilks
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Competing dopamine neurons drive oviposition choice for ethanol in Drosophila.

Authors:  Reza Azanchi; Karla R Kaun; Ulrike Heberlein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evidence for the adaptive significance of enzyme activity levels: interspecific variation in alpha-GPDH and ADH in Drosophila.

Authors:  J F McDonald; J C Avise
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.890

8.  Behavior genetics of olfactory responses in Drosophila. I. Olfactometry and strain differences in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Y Fuyama
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  Identification and field evaluation of fermentation volatiles from wine and vinegar that mediate attraction of spotted wing Drosophila, Drosophila suzukii.

Authors:  Dong H Cha; Todd Adams; Helmuth Rogg; Peter J Landolt
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Phototactic responses along a gradient of light intensities for the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  P A Parsons
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.805

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.