Literature DB >> 28308458

Interspecific variation in the escape responses of aphids: effect on risk of predation from foliar-foraging and ground-foraging predators.

John E Losey1, Robert F Denno1.   

Abstract

A series of laboratory experiments was conducted to determine the effect of interspecific differences on prey defensive behavior on the susceptibility of two aphid species (Acyrthosiphon pisum and A. kondoi) to a ground-foraging predator, Harpalus pennsylvanicus, and a foliar-foraging predator, Coccinella septempunctata. These organisms are representative of a biologically and economically important predator/prey system in alfalfa. The primary defensive behavior of both aphid species toward C. septempunctata was to "drop" from the plant. Both aphid species were significantly more likely to drop from the plant in the presence of C. septempunctata. However, when C. septempunctata was present, a significantly lower proportion of A. kondoi individuals dropped (0.42 ± 0.07) compared to A. pisum (0.73 ± 0.08). As a result of their lower propensity to drop from the plant A. kondoi individuals are significantly more likely to be consumed by C. septempunctata. Conversely, the higher propensity of A. pisum individuals to drop increased their susceptibility to ground-foraging predators. When A. pisum was the prey species, ground-foraging predators made a significant contribution to overall aphid suppression and there was a significant synergistic interaction between ground and foliar-foraging predators. When A. kondoi was the prey there was no interaction between the predator species. As either a cause or consequence of its higher propensity to drop, A. pisum seems to be more adapted for survival and dispersal off the plant. In comparison to A. kondoi individuals, A. pisum individuals relocate plants more quickly (63 ± 41 s vs. 164 ± 39 s), disperse farther (18 ± 1.7 cm vs. 13 ± 0.66 cm), and survive longer (37 ± 2.0 h vs. 25 ± 2.0) off the plant. This study demonstrates the importance of prey defensive behavior in determining the susceptibility of a prey species to a multiple-predator complex.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carabids; Coccinellids; Key words Predation; Prey defensive behavior; Synergistic interaction

Year:  1998        PMID: 28308458     DOI: 10.1007/s004420050513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  16 in total

1.  Estimating the prevalence and strength of non-independent predator effects.

Authors:  Heather D Vance-Chalcraft; Daniel A Soluk
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Avoiding incidental predation by mammalian herbivores: accurate detection and efficient response in aphids.

Authors:  Moshe Gish; Amots Dafni; Moshe Inbar
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-07-08

3.  Adaptation of Defensive Strategies by the Pea Aphid Mediates Predation Risk from the Predatory Lady Beetle.

Authors:  Li-Peng Fan; Fang Ouyang; Jian-Wei Su; Feng Ge
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Predator avoidance in phytophagous mites: response to present danger depends on alternative host quality.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Choh; Junji Takabayashi
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Complex interactions between a plant pathogen and insect parasitoid via the shared vector-host: consequences for host plant infection.

Authors:  Simon Hodge; Glen Powell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Can chemical communication be cryptic? Adaptations by herbivores to natural enemies exploiting prey semiochemistry.

Authors:  Kenneth F Raffa; Kenneth R Hobson; Sara Lafontaine; Brian H Aukema
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Delineating the effects of a plant trait on interactions among associated insects.

Authors:  Gary C Chang; Sanford D Eigenbrode
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Combining plant- and soil-dwelling predatory mites to optimise biological control of thrips.

Authors:  Jürgen Wiethoff; Hans-Michael Poehling; Rainer Meyhöfer
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Young aphids avoid erroneous dropping when evading mammalian herbivores by combining input from two sensory modalities.

Authors:  Moshe Gish; Amots Dafni; Moshe Inbar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Plant species composition alters the sign and strength of an emergent multi-predator effect by modifying predator foraging behaviour.

Authors:  Andrew Wilby; Linda Anderson Anglin; Christopher M Nesbit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.