Literature DB >> 15651523

Combining plant- and soil-dwelling predatory mites to optimise biological control of thrips.

Jürgen Wiethoff1, Hans-Michael Poehling, Rainer Meyhöfer.   

Abstract

The efficiency of a natural enemy combination compared to a single species release for the control of western flower thrips (WFT) Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) on cucumber plants was investigated. Since a large part of F occidentalis seems to enter the soil passage, a joint release of the plant-inhabiting predatory mite Amblyseius cucumeris (Oudemans) that feeds on thrips first-instar larvae and the soil-dwelling predatory mite Hypoaspis aculeifer (Canestrini) that preys on thrips pupae in the ground might offer a promising approach for a holistic control strategy. Therefore, two sets of experiments were conducted in cooperation with a commercial vegetable grower where the plants in plots were infested with a defined number of larval and adult F occidentalis. Two species of natural enemies were released either synchronously or solely, and their efficacy was compared to control plots devoid of antagonists. In both experiments, the predatory mites were released twice with a density of 46 A. cucumeris/m2, and 207 H. aculeifer/m2 (low-density) in the first experiment and 528 H. aculeifer/m2 (high-density) in the second one. Population growth of all arthropod species on the plants and in the soil was quantified at regular intervals and included all soil-dwelling mites and alternative preys present in the substrate. The results showed that H. aculeifer alone had a significant impact on thrips population development only when released at high-densities, but competence was lower compared to the other antagonist treatments. The impact of A. cucumeris alone and A. cucumeris & H. aculeifer combined was similar. Thus, the pooled exploitation of natural enemies did not boost thrips control compared to the single species application of A. cucumeris (non-additive effect), which could be explained by resource competition between both predatory mite species. Species number and population size in the soil of the experimental plots both showed a high variability, a possible consequence of their interaction with released soil-dwelling predatory H. aculeifer mites. The impact of resource competition and presence of alternative preys on thrips biological control is exhaustively discussed. From our study, we can extract the subsequent conclusions: (1) the combined use of H. aculeifer and A. cucumeris cannot increase thrips control on cucumber compared to the release of A. cucumeris alone, but the overall reliability of thrips biological control might be enhanced, (2) the availability of alternative preys seemed to affect the thrips predation rate of H. aculeifer, and (3) the impact of naturally occurring soil predatory mites on the control of WFT seemed to be partial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15651523     DOI: 10.1023/b:appa.0000049137.26697.b9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol        ISSN: 0168-8162            Impact factor:   2.380


  6 in total

1.  Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey.

Authors:  A Sih; G Englund; D Wooster
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Predator-prey relationships in a two-species toxicity test system.

Authors:  T Hamers; P H Krogh
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.291

3.  Non-additive effects of multiple natural enemies on aphid populations.

Authors:  Kenneth I Ferguson; Peter Stiling
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Interspecific variation in the escape responses of aphids: effect on risk of predation from foliar-foraging and ground-foraging predators.

Authors:  John E Losey; Robert F Denno
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Identification and bioactivity of alarm pheromone in the western flower thrips,Frankliniella occidentalis.

Authors:  C R Teerling; H D Pierce; J H Borden; D R Gillespie
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Propensity towards cannibalism among Hypoaspis aculeifer and H. miles, two soil-dwelling predatory mite species.

Authors:  Oliver Berndt; Rainer Meyhöfer; Hans-Michael Poehling
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.380

  6 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  The use of soil mites in ecotoxicology: a review.

Authors:  Pierre Huguier; Nicolas Manier; Olugbenga John Owojori; Pascale Bauda; Pascal Pandard; Jörg Römbke
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  Non-phytoseiid Mesostigmata within citrus orchards in Florida: species distribution, relative and seasonal abundance within trees, associated vines and ground cover plants and additional collection records of mites in citrus orchards.

Authors:  Carl C Childers; Eduard A Ueckermann
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  Laboratory studies on the use of two new arenas to evaluate the impact of the predatory mites Blattisocius tarsalis and Cheyletus eruditus on residual populations of the stored product mite Acarus siro.

Authors:  B B Thind; H L Ford
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.132

4.  Generalist-feeding subterranean mites as potential biological control agents of immature corn rootworms.

Authors:  Deirdre A Prischmann; Eric M Knutson; Kenton E Dashiell; Jonathan G Lundgren
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Impact of factitious foods and prey on the oviposition of the predatory mites Gaeolaelaps aculeifer and Stratiolaelaps scimitus (Acari: Laelapidae).

Authors:  C Navarro-Campos; F L Wäckers; A Pekas
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 6.  Review: predatory soil mites as biocontrol agents of above- and below-ground plant pests.

Authors:  Giuditta M Beretta; Jacques A Deere; Gerben J Messelink; Karen Muñoz-Cárdenas; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Attraction effect of different colored cards on thrips Frankliniella intonsa in cowpea greenhouses in China.

Authors:  Liangang Mao; Yiming Chang; Fulai Yang; Lan Zhang; Yanning Zhang; Hongyun Jiang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.