Literature DB >> 16047196

Estimating the prevalence and strength of non-independent predator effects.

Heather D Vance-Chalcraft1, Daniel A Soluk.   

Abstract

Understanding whether multiple predator species have independent effects on shared prey is critical for understanding community dynamics. We describe the prevalence and strength of non-independence between predators by quantifying the prey's risk of predation and the degree to which it deviates from the risk predicted from a null model of independent predator effects. Specifically, we document how frequently non-independent effects occur among ten different multiple predator combinations with mayfly larvae as prey. These predator combinations vary both predator density and predator species richness. Overall, the predator effects were non-independent and translated to an average of 27% fewer prey being consumed compared to independent predator effects. Non-independence of this magnitude is likely to have population level consequences for the prey and influence the distribution or prey preference of predators. Closer inspection shows that much of the risk reduction in this system is weak, to the point of being indistinguishable from independent predator effects, while few effects are strong. This pattern of many weak interactions and few strong ones parallels the pattern of interaction strengths documented previously in intertidal communities. Consequently, understanding strong interactors in multiple predator systems may help us understand the importance of a species.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16047196     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0201-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  14 in total

1.  Multiple predator effects result in risk reduction for prey across multiple prey densities.

Authors:  Heather D Vance-Chalcraft; Daniel A Soluk
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Effect size in ecological experiments: the application of biological models in meta-analysis.

Authors:  C W Osenberg; O Sarnelle; S D Cooper
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey.

Authors:  A Sih; G Englund; D Wooster
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Intra versus interspecific interactions of ladybeetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) attacking aphids.

Authors:  Edward W Evans
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Balancing risks? Responses and non-responses of mayfly larvae to fish and stonefly predators.

Authors:  Daniel A Soluk; Nicholas C Collins
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A mechanism for interference between stream predators: responses of the stonefly Agnetina capitata to the presence of sculpins.

Authors:  Daniel A Soluk; Nicholas C Collins
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Influence of intraguild predation among generalist insect predators on the suppression of an herbivore population.

Authors:  Jay A Rosenheim; Lawrence R Wilhoit; Christine A Armer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems.

Authors:  M P Hassell
Journal:  Monogr Popul Biol       Date:  1978

9.  Interspecific variation in the escape responses of aphids: effect on risk of predation from foliar-foraging and ground-foraging predators.

Authors:  John E Losey; Robert F Denno
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Limiting similarity and the intensity of competitive effects on the mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi, in experimental stream communities.

Authors:  W J Resetarits
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  7 in total

1.  Detecting emergent effects of multiple predator species.

Authors:  Blaine D Griffen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Shoaling behaviour enhances risk of predation from multiple predator guilds in a marine fish.

Authors:  John R Ford; Stephen E Swearer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Influence of predator density on nonindependent effects of multiple predator species.

Authors:  Blaine D Griffen; Tucker Williamson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Bugs scaring bugs: enemy-risk effects in biological control systems.

Authors:  Michael Culshaw-Maurer; Andrew Sih; Jay A Rosenheim
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Influence of multiple predators decreases body condition and fecundity of European hares.

Authors:  Martijn J A Weterings; Sanne Losekoot; Henry J Kuipers; Herbert H T Prins; Frank van Langevelde; Sipke E van Wieren
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Nonlinearities lead to qualitative differences in population dynamics of predator-prey systems.

Authors:  Olga M C C Ameixa; Gerben J Messelink; Pavel Kindlmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Plant Resources as a Factor Altering Emergent Multi-Predator Effects.

Authors:  Dionyssia A Maselou; Dionyssios Ch Perdikis; Maurice W Sabelis; Argyro A Fantinou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.