Literature DB >> 28307627

Early survival in roe deer: causes and consequences of cohort variation in two contrasted populations.

Jean-Michel Gaillard1, Jean-Marie Boutin2, Daniel Delorme2, Guy Van Laere2, Patrick Duncan3, Jean-Dominique Lebreton4.   

Abstract

Time- and sex-specific summer survival of roe deer fawns was estimated using capture-mark-recapture methods in two enclosed populations living in contrasting conditions. The population of Trois Fontaines (eastern France) was roughly constant in size throughout the study period, while in Chizé (western France), the population experienced frequent summer droughts and numbers decreased continuously during the study. Early survival of fawns was low and highly variable over the years at both Chizé and Trois Fontaines, and demonstrated marked variations between cohorts that need to be taken into account when modelling roe deer population dynamics. In Trois Fontaines, fawn survival was positively correlated with early body growth and total rainfall in May and June. In Chizé, fawn survival decreased with increasing density and tended to increase with increasing rainfall in May and June and adult female body mass. These factors explained more than 75% of the variability in early survival observed in both populations. Variation between cohorts had different consequences for the two populations. At Trois Fontaines, cohort variation was limited to a numerical effect on early survival. However at Chizé, cohort variation was long-lasting and affected the phenotypic quality of survivors at later ages, and thereby future survival and breeding abilities (both numerical and quality effects). Male and female fawns had similar survival over their first summer in both populations. This result contrasts with the lower survival of young males often observed in ungulates. Two ultimate causes can be proposed to account for the low and variable survival of roe deer fawns over the first summer: the high energy expenditures incurred by does during each breeding attempt and/or the low absolute body size of newborn roe deer fawns.

Keywords:  Density dependence; Environmental variation; Key words Ungulates; Population dynamics; Sexual selection

Year:  1997        PMID: 28307627     DOI: 10.1007/s004420050338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  27 in total

1.  Spatial variation in springtime food resources influences the winter body mass of roe deer fawns.

Authors:  Nathalie Pettorelli; Stephane Dray; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Daniel Chessel; Patrick Duncan; Andrew Illius; Nadine Guillon; Francois Klein; Guy Van Laere
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Assessing survival in a multi-population system: a case study on bat populations.

Authors:  Eleni Papadatou; Carlos Ibáñez; Roger Pradel; Javier Juste; Olivier Gimenez
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Density-dependent effects on physical condition and reproduction in North American elk: an experimental test.

Authors:  Kelley M Stewart; R Terry Bowyer; Brian L Dick; Bruce K Johnson; John G Kie
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Density-dependent responses of fawn cohort body mass in two contrasting roe deer populations.

Authors:  Petter Kjellander; Jean-Michel Gaillard; A J Mark Hewison
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Phenotypic determinants of individual fitness in female fur seals: larger is better.

Authors:  Gwénaël Beauplet; Christophe Guinet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Lack of compensatory body growth in a high performance moose Alces alces population.

Authors:  Erling J Solberg; Mathieu Garel; Morten Heim; Vidar Grøtan; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Population density and sex do not influence fine-scale natal dispersal in roe deer.

Authors:  J-M Gaillard; A J M Hewison; P Kjellander; N Pettorelli; C Bonenfant; B Van Moorter; O Liberg; H Andren; G Van Laere; F Klein; J-M Angibault; A Coulon; C Vanpé
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Reduced microsatellite heterozygosity does not affect natal dispersal in three contrasting roe deer populations.

Authors:  Cécile Vanpé; Lucie Debeffe; A J Mark Hewison; Erwan Quéméré; Jean-François Lemaître; Maxime Galan; Britany Amblard; François Klein; Bruno Cargnelutti; Gilles Capron; Joël Merlet; Claude Warnant; Jean-Michel Gaillard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Variability in temporary emigration rates of individually marked female Weddell seals prior to first reproduction.

Authors:  Glenn E Stauffer; Jay J Rotella; Robert A Garrott
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Maternal and individual effects in selection of bed sites and their consequences for fawn survival at different spatial scales.

Authors:  Bram Van Moorter; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Philip D McLoughlin; Daniel Delorme; François Klein; Mark S Boyce
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.