Literature DB >> 28307449

Floral constancy in bumble bees: handling efficiency or perceptual conditioning?

Paul Wilson1, Melissa Stine2.   

Abstract

Individual bees often prefer flowers of the same species that they are already foraging on, and other individual bees prefer other flowers. This "floral constancy" has classically been explained as a learned behavior by which bees avoid wasting time switching between handling techniques. Choice trails were given to Bombus vagans workers that were freely foraging in mixed and pure fields of Trifolium pratense, T. repens, Viccia cracca, and Prunella vulgaris. Contrary to expectation, (1) bees showed if anything a stronger preference for their flower type in pure fields where they lacked experience than in a mixed field where they had had the opportunity to learn, (2) there was greater constancy in a mixed field of the two morphologically similar Trifolium species than in a mixed field of the morphologically disparate T. pratense and P. vulgaris, and (3) bees were more willing to switch between flowers of distinct morphologies when the colors were similar than between flowers of distinct colors when the morphologies were similar. We suggest that constancy is due to some form of perceptual conditioning whereby individual bees become temporarily sensitized to one or a few floral cues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bombus vagans; Conditioning; Constancy; Handling; Pollination

Year:  1996        PMID: 28307449     DOI: 10.1007/BF00329707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Modes and origins of mechanical and ethological isolation in angiosperms.

Authors:  V Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Memory Constraints and Flower Choice in Pieris rapae.

Authors:  A C Lewis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Pollination systems as isolating mechanisms in angiosperms.

Authors:  V GRANT
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1949-03       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Ultraviolet as a component of flower reflections, and the colour perception of Hymenoptera.

Authors:  L Chittka; A Shmida; N Troje; R Menzel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Behavior of bumble bee pollinators of Aralia hispida Vent. (Araliaceae).

Authors:  James D Thomson; Wayne P Maddison; R C Plowright
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Floral colour versus phylogeny in structuring subalpine flowering communities.

Authors:  Jamie R McEwen; Jana C Vamosi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Multicomponent floral signals elicit selective foraging in bumblebees.

Authors:  Robert J Gegear
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-05-10

3.  Specialist Osmia bees forage indiscriminately among hybridizing Balsamorhiza floral hosts.

Authors:  James H Cane
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Effects of spatial patterning of co-flowering plant species on pollination quantity and purity.

Authors:  James D Thomson; Hannah F Fung; Jane E Ogilvie
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 5.  Recognition of a familiar place by the honeybee (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  G A Horridge
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  The Influence of Prior Learning Experience on Pollinator Choice: An Experiment Using Bumblebees on Two Wild Floral Types of Antirrhinum majus.

Authors:  Coline C Jaworski; Christophe Andalo; Christine Raynaud; Valérie Simon; Christophe Thébaud; Jérôme Chave
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.