Literature DB >> 11607448

Modes and origins of mechanical and ethological isolation in angiosperms.

V Grant1.   

Abstract

Mechanical and ethological isolation between species is widespread in angiosperms with specialized animal-pollinated flowers, being recorded in 29 species groups belonging to 27 genera and 16 families. Mechanical isolation occurs in two forms. (i) The common type, designated the Salvia type, operates when two or more species of flowers are adapted for different groups of pollinators with different body sizes and shapes. (ii) In the Pedicularis type two flower species have the same species of pollinator but pick up pollen from different parts of the pollinator's body. Four forms of ethological isolation are recognized. (i) In the Aquilegia type, which is widespread, ethological isolation is a side effect of mechanical isolation. (ii) The flower-constancy type, as the name suggests, is based on flower-constant foraging behavior. (iii) In the Ophrys type, floral scents attract male bees or wasps and play a role in their mating behavior; different species of flowers, often orchids, have different scents and attract different sets of hymenopteran species. (iv) The monotropy type occurs in plants pollinated by hymenopterans with species-specific or group-specific flower preferences for nutritive purposes (monotropic and oligotropic bees and fig wasps). Three modes of origin of floral isolation are confirmed by evidence: (i) mechanical and ethological isolation arising as a by-product of allopatric speciation, (ii) ethological isolation developing by selection for reproductive isolation per se, and (iii) mechanical isolation arising as a by-product of character displacement. Mode of origin i accounts for the Salvia and Aquilegia types of isolation in nine known species groups and for the Ophrys type in one group. Mode of origin ii accounts for the flower-constancy type of ethological isolation in two species groups. Mode of origin iii explains mechanical isolation in two groups. Sympatric origin of floral isolation by hybrid speciation and by flower constancy has been proposed, but these modes are undocumented and improbable.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 11607448      PMCID: PMC42875          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

1.  Effects of hybridization and selection on floral isolation.

Authors:  V Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Origin of floral isolation between ornithophilous and sphingophilous plant species.

Authors:  V Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Floral isolation between ornithophilous and sphingophilous species of Ipomopsis and Aquilegia.

Authors:  V Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Foraging ability of rufous hummingbirds on hummingbird flowers and hawkmoth flowers.

Authors:  V Grant; E J Temeles
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total
  70 in total

1.  Sexual selection in plants: pros and cons.

Authors:  V Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Floral symmetry affects speciation rates in angiosperms.

Authors:  Risa D Sargent
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Evidence of red sensitive photoreceptors in Pygopleurus israelitus (Glaphyridae: Coleoptera) and its implications for beetle pollination in the southeast Mediterranean.

Authors:  J Martínez-Harms; M Vorobyev; J Schorn; A Shmida; T Keasar; U Homberg; F Schmeling; R Menzel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Remarkable coexistence of multiple cytotypes of the Gymnadenia conopsea aggregate (the fragrant orchid): evidence from flow cytometry.

Authors:  Pavel Trávnícek; Barbora Kubátová; Vladislav Curn; Jana Rauchová; Eva Krajníková; Jana Jersáková; Jan Suda
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-11-07       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  The presence of co-flowering species facilitates reproductive success of Pedicularis monbeigiana (Orobanchaceae) through variation in bumble-bee foraging behaviour.

Authors:  Kuo Liao; Robert W Gituru; You-Hao Guo; Qing-Feng Wang
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Dissection of floral pollination syndromes in Petunia.

Authors:  Jeroen Stuurman; Maria Elena Hoballah; Larissa Broger; James Moore; Christopher Basten; Cris Kuhlemeier
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Multicomponent floral signals elicit selective foraging in bumblebees.

Authors:  Robert J Gegear
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-05-10

8.  Evidence for pollinator sharing in Mediterranean nectar-mimic orchids: absence of premating barriers?

Authors:  Salvatore Cozzolino; Florian P Schiestl; Andreas Müller; Olga De Castro; Antonio Marco Nardella; Alex Widmer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Experimental sympatry reveals geographic variation in floral isolation by hawkmoths.

Authors:  Kathleen M Kay; Aubrey M Zepeda; Robert A Raguso
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Exploring the boundary between pollination syndromes: bats and hummingbirds as pollinators of Burmeistera cyclostigmata and B. tenuiflora (Campanulaceae).

Authors:  Nathan Muchhala
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-01-11       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.