Literature DB >> 28306555

Assessment of dosimetric impact of system specific geometric distortion in an MRI only based radiotherapy workflow for prostate.

C Gustafsson1, F Nordström, E Persson, J Brynolfsson, L E Olsson.   

Abstract

Dosimetric errors in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) only radiotherapy workflow may be caused by system specific geometric distortion from MRI. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact on planned dose distribution and delineated structures for prostate patients, originating from this distortion. A method was developed, in which computer tomography (CT) images were distorted using the MRI distortion field. The displacement map for an optimized MRI treatment planning sequence was measured using a dedicated phantom in a 3 T MRI system. To simulate the distortion aspects of a synthetic CT (electron density derived from MR images), the displacement map was applied to CT images, referred to as distorted CT images. A volumetric modulated arc prostate treatment plan was applied to the original CT and the distorted CT, creating a reference and a distorted CT dose distribution. By applying the inverse of the displacement map to the distorted CT dose distribution, a dose distribution in the same geometry as the original CT images was created. For 10 prostate cancer patients, the dose difference between the reference dose distribution and inverse distorted CT dose distribution was analyzed in isodose level bins. The mean magnitude of the geometric distortion was 1.97 mm for the radial distance of 200-250 mm from isocenter. The mean percentage dose differences for all isodose level bins, were  ⩽0.02% and the radiotherapy structure mean volume deviations were  <0.2%. The method developed can quantify the dosimetric effects of MRI system specific distortion in a prostate MRI only radiotherapy workflow, separated from dosimetric effects originating from synthetic CT generation. No clinically relevant dose difference or structure deformation was found when 3D distortion correction and high acquisition bandwidth was used. The method could be used for any MRI sequence together with any anatomy of interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28306555     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa5fa2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  14 in total

1.  Characterization of hardware-related spatial distortions for IR-PETRA pulse sequence using a brain specific phantom.

Authors:  Sima Ahmadian; Iraj Jabbari; Seyed Mehdi Bagherimofidi; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Audit feasibility for geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy.

Authors:  Meshal Alzahrani; David A Broadbent; Robert Chuter; Bashar Al-Qaisieh; Steven Jackson; Hutton Michael; Robert I Johnstone; Simon Shah; Andreas Wetscherek; H Joan Chick; Jonathan J Wyatt; Hazel Mhairi McCallum; Richard Speight
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-07

3.  Iterative inversion of deformation vector fields with feedback control.

Authors:  Abhishek Dubey; Alexandros-Stavros Iliopoulos; Xiaobai Sun; Fang-Fang Yin; Lei Ren
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration.

Authors:  Katri Nousiainen; Teemu Mäkelä
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 5.  Cancer risk assessment in modern radiotherapy workflow with medical big data.

Authors:  Fu Jin; Huan-Li Luo; Juan Zhou; Ya-Nan He; Xian-Feng Liu; Ming-Song Zhong; Han Yang; Chao Li; Qi-Cheng Li; Xia Huang; Xiu-Mei Tian; Da Qiu; Guang-Lei He; Li Yin; Ying Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Evaluation of dosimetric uncertainty caused by MR geometric distortion in MRI-based liver SBRT treatment planning.

Authors:  Silu Han; Fang-Fang Yin; Jing Cai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  MR-PROTECT: Clinical feasibility of a prostate MRI-only radiotherapy treatment workflow and investigation of acceptance criteria.

Authors:  Emilia Persson; Christian Jamtheim Gustafsson; Petra Ambolt; Silke Engelholm; Sofie Ceberg; Sven Bäck; Lars E Olsson; Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Cone beam CT for QA of synthetic CT in MRI only for prostate patients.

Authors:  Emilia Palmér; Emilia Persson; Petra Ambolt; Christian Gustafsson; Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson; Lars E Olsson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Using C-Arm X-ray images from marker insertion to confirm the gold fiducial marker identification in an MRI-only prostate radiotherapy workflow.

Authors:  Christian Gustafsson; Emilia Persson; Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson; Lars E Olsson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  A Comparison of the Distortion in the Same Field MRI and MR-Linac System With a 3D Printed Phantom.

Authors:  Xuechun Liu; Zhenjiang Li; Yi Rong; Minsong Cao; Hongyu Li; Chuntao Jia; Liting Shi; Weizhao Lu; Guanzhong Gong; Yong Yin; Jianfeng Qiu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.