Importance: In the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaboration (CTTC), in patients starting with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of approximately 3.4 mmol/L (131.5 mg/dL), there was a 22% reduction in major vascular events per 1-mmol/L (38.7-mg/dL) lowering of LDL-C. The magnitude of clinical benefit of further LDL-C lowering in patients already with very low LDL-C levels remains debated. Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of further lowering LDL-C levels in patient populations presenting with median LDL-C levels of 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) or less. Data Sources and Study Selection: The CTTC was used for statin data. For nonstatin therapy, Medline database was searched (2015-April 2018). Key inclusion criteria were a randomized, double-blind, controlled cardiovascular outcome trial of LDL-C lowering with data in populations starting with LDL-C levels averaging 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) or less. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two authors independently extracted data into standardized data sheets, and data were analyzed using meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The risk ratio (RR) of major vascular events (a composite of coronary heart death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or coronary revascularization) per 1-mmol/L (38.7-mg/dL) reduction in LDL-C level. Results: In the subgroup of patients from the CTTC meta-analysis of statins with a mean LDL-C in the control arm of 1.7 mmol/L (65.7 mg/dL), 1922 major vascular events occurred and the RR for major vascular events per 1-mmol/L (38.7-mg/dL) reduction in LDL-C was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65-0.94). For 3 trials of nonstatin LDL-C-lowering therapies added to statins, there were 50 627 patients, the median LDL-C in the control arms ranged from 1.6 mmol/L to 1.8 mmol/L (63 mg/dL to 70 mg/dL), and 9570 major vascular events occurred. Nonstatin therapy lowered LDL-C by 0.3 to 1.2 mmol/L (11 mg/dL to 45 mg/dL), and the RR for major vascular events per 1-mmol/L (38.7-mg/dL) reduction in LDL-C was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.88). For statins and nonstatins combined, the RR was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.71-0.87; P < .001). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering was not associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events, myalgias and/or myositis, elevation in the level of aminotransferases, new-onset diabetes, hemorrhagic stroke, or cancer. Conclusions and Relevance: There is a consistent relative risk reduction in major vascular events per change in LDL-C in patient populations starting as low as a median of 1.6 mmol/L (63 mg/dL) and achieving levels as low as a median of 0.5 mmol/L (21 mg/dL), with no observed offsetting adverse effects. These data suggest further lowering of LDL-C beyond the lowest current targets would further reduce cardiovascular risk.
Importance: In the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaboration (CTTC), in patients starting with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of approximately 3.4 mmol/L (131.5 mg/dL), there was a 22% reduction in major vascular events per 1-mmol/L (38.7-mg/dL) lowering of LDL-C. The magnitude of clinical benefit of further LDL-C lowering in patients already with very low LDL-C levels remains debated. Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of further lowering LDL-C levels in patient populations presenting with median LDL-C levels of 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) or less. Data Sources and Study Selection: The CTTC was used for statin data. For nonstatin therapy, Medline database was searched (2015-April 2018). Key inclusion criteria were a randomized, double-blind, controlled cardiovascular outcome trial of LDL-C lowering with data in populations starting with LDL-C levels averaging 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) or less. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two authors independently extracted data into standardized data sheets, and data were analyzed using meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The risk ratio (RR) of major vascular events (a composite of coronary heart death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or coronary revascularization) per 1-mmol/L (38.7-mg/dL) reduction in LDL-C level. Results: In the subgroup of patients from the CTTC meta-analysis of statins with a mean LDL-C in the control arm of 1.7 mmol/L (65.7 mg/dL), 1922 major vascular events occurred and the RR for major vascular events per 1-mmol/L (38.7-mg/dL) reduction in LDL-C was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65-0.94). For 3 trials of nonstatinLDL-C-lowering therapies added to statins, there were 50 627 patients, the median LDL-C in the control arms ranged from 1.6 mmol/L to 1.8 mmol/L (63 mg/dL to 70 mg/dL), and 9570 major vascular events occurred. Nonstatin therapy lowered LDL-C by 0.3 to 1.2 mmol/L (11 mg/dL to 45 mg/dL), and the RR for major vascular events per 1-mmol/L (38.7-mg/dL) reduction in LDL-C was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.88). For statins and nonstatins combined, the RR was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.71-0.87; P < .001). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering was not associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events, myalgias and/or myositis, elevation in the level of aminotransferases, new-onset diabetes, hemorrhagic stroke, or cancer. Conclusions and Relevance: There is a consistent relative risk reduction in major vascular events per change in LDL-C in patient populations starting as low as a median of 1.6 mmol/L (63 mg/dL) and achieving levels as low as a median of 0.5 mmol/L (21 mg/dL), with no observed offsetting adverse effects. These data suggest further lowering of LDL-C beyond the lowest current targets would further reduce cardiovascular risk.
Authors: Louise Bowman; Jemma C Hopewell; Fang Chen; Karl Wallendszus; William Stevens; Rory Collins; Stephen D Wiviott; Christopher P Cannon; Eugene Braunwald; Emily Sammons; Martin J Landray Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-08-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ulf Landmesser; M John Chapman; Jane K Stock; Pierre Amarenco; Jill J F Belch; Jan Borén; Michel Farnier; Brian A Ference; Stephan Gielen; Ian Graham; Diederick E Grobbee; G Kees Hovingh; Thomas F Lüscher; Massimo F Piepoli; Kausik K Ray; Erik S Stroes; Olov Wiklund; Stephan Windecker; Jose Luis Zamorano; Fausto Pinto; Lale Tokgözoglu; Jeroen J Bax; Alberico L Catapano Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-04-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Dhruv S Kazi; Joanne Penko; Pamela G Coxson; Andrew E Moran; Daniel A Ollendorf; Jeffrey A Tice; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Gregg C Fonarow; Anthony C Keech; Terje R Pedersen; Robert P Giugliano; Peter S Sever; Peter Lindgren; Ben van Hout; Guillermo Villa; Yi Qian; Ransi Somaratne; Marc S Sabatine Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Scott M Grundy; James I Cleeman; C Noel Bairey Merz; H Bryan Brewer; Luther T Clark; Donald B Hunninghake; Richard C Pasternak; Sidney C Smith; Neil J Stone Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-07-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Robert P Giugliano; Anthony Keech; Sabina A Murphy; Kurt Huber; S Lale Tokgozoglu; Basil S Lewis; Jorge Ferreira; Armando Lira Pineda; Ransi Somaratne; Peter S Sever; Terje R Pedersen; Marc S Sabatine Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Robert P Giugliano; Terje R Pedersen; Jeong-Gun Park; Gaetano M De Ferrari; Zbigniew A Gaciong; Richard Ceska; Kalman Toth; Ioanna Gouni-Berthold; Jose Lopez-Miranda; François Schiele; François Mach; Brian R Ott; Estella Kanevsky; Armando Lira Pineda; Ransi Somaratne; Scott M Wasserman; Anthony C Keech; Peter S Sever; Marc S Sabatine Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-08-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: C Baigent; L Blackwell; J Emberson; L E Holland; C Reith; N Bhala; R Peto; E H Barnes; A Keech; J Simes; R Collins Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Maciej Banach; Niloofar Shekoohi; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Gregory Y H Lip; Adrian V Hernandez; Mohsen Mazidi Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 3.707
Authors: Baris Gencer; Nicholas A Marston; KyungAh Im; Christopher P Cannon; Peter Sever; Anthony Keech; Eugene Braunwald; Robert P Giugliano; Marc S Sabatine Journal: Lancet Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 202.731