Leonardo De Luca1,2, Marcello Arca3, Pier L Temporelli4, Furio Colivicchi5, Lucio Gonzini2, Donata Lucci2, Biagio Bosco6, Mariella Callerame7, Giulio V Lettica8, Andrea Di Lenarda9, Michele M Gulizia10. 1. Division of Cardiology, S. Giovanni Evangelista Hospital, Tivoli, Italy. 2. ANMCO Research Center, Firenze, Italy. 3. Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy. 4. Division of Cardiology, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, IRCCS, Novara, Italy. 5. Division of Cardiology, S. Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy. 6. Division of Cardiology, S. Giuseppe e Melorio Hospital, S. Maria Capua Vetere, Italy. 7. Division of Cardiology, V. Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy. 8. Division of Cardiology, R. Guzzardi Hospital, Vittoria, Ragusa, Italy. 9. Cardiology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste, Trieste, Italy. 10. Division of Cardiology, Garibaldi-Nesima Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited disorder characterized by elevated plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) associated with premature cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Using the data from the START (STable Coronary Artery Diseases RegisTry) study, a nationwide, prospective survey on patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), we described prevalence and lipid lowering strategies commonly employed in these patients. The study population was divided into "definite/probable FH," defined as a Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) score ≥6, "possible FH" with DLCN 3-5, and "unlikely FH" in presence of a DLCN <3. RESULTS: Among the 4030 patients with the DLCN score available, 132 (3.3%) were classified as FH (2.3% with definite/probable and 1.0% with possible FH) and 3898 (96.7%) had unlikely FH. Patients with both definite/probable and possible FH were younger compared to patients not presenting FH. Mean on-treatment LDL-C levels were 107.8 ± 41.5, 84.4 ± 40.9, and 85.8 ± 32.3 (P < 0.0001) and a target of ≤70 mg/dL was reached in 10.9%, 30.0%, and 22.0% (P < 0.0001) of patents with definite/probable, possible FH, and unlikely FH, respectively. Statin therapy was prescribed in 85 (92.4%) patients with definite/probable FH, in 38 (95.0%) with possible FH, and in 3621 (92.9%) with unlikely FH (P = 0.86). The association of statin and ezetimibe, in absence of other lipid-lowering therapy, was more frequently used in patients with definite/probable FH compared to patients without FH (31.5% vs 17.5% vs 9.5%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of consecutive patients with stable CAD, FH was highly prevalent and generally undertreated with lipid lowering therapies.
INTRODUCTION:Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited disorder characterized by elevated plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) associated with premature cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Using the data from the START (STable Coronary Artery Diseases RegisTry) study, a nationwide, prospective survey on patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), we described prevalence and lipid lowering strategies commonly employed in these patients. The study population was divided into "definite/probable FH," defined as a Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) score ≥6, "possible FH" with DLCN 3-5, and "unlikely FH" in presence of a DLCN <3. RESULTS: Among the 4030 patients with the DLCN score available, 132 (3.3%) were classified as FH (2.3% with definite/probable and 1.0% with possible FH) and 3898 (96.7%) had unlikely FH. Patients with both definite/probable and possible FH were younger compared to patients not presenting FH. Mean on-treatment LDL-C levels were 107.8 ± 41.5, 84.4 ± 40.9, and 85.8 ± 32.3 (P < 0.0001) and a target of ≤70 mg/dL was reached in 10.9%, 30.0%, and 22.0% (P < 0.0001) of patents with definite/probable, possible FH, and unlikely FH, respectively. Statin therapy was prescribed in 85 (92.4%) patients with definite/probable FH, in 38 (95.0%) with possible FH, and in 3621 (92.9%) with unlikely FH (P = 0.86). The association of statin and ezetimibe, in absence of other lipid-lowering therapy, was more frequently used in patients with definite/probable FH compared to patients without FH (31.5% vs 17.5% vs 9.5%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of consecutive patients with stable CAD, FH was highly prevalent and generally undertreated with lipid lowering therapies.
Authors: Alberico L Catapano; Ian Graham; Guy De Backer; Olov Wiklund; M John Chapman; Heinz Drexel; Arno W Hoes; Catriona S Jennings; Ulf Landmesser; Terje R Pedersen; Željko Reiner; Gabriele Riccardi; Marja-Riita Taskinen; Lale Tokgozoglu; W M Monique Verschuren; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; David A Wood; Jose Luis Zamorano; Marie-Therese Cooney Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2016-08-27 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: David Nanchen; Baris Gencer; Reto Auer; Lorenz Räber; Giulio G Stefanini; Roland Klingenberg; Christian M Schmied; Jacques Cornuz; Olivier Muller; Pierre Vogt; Peter Jüni; Christian M Matter; Stephan Windecker; Thomas F Lüscher; François Mach; Nicolas Rodondi Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-07-04 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Zeljko Reiner; Alberico L Catapano; Guy De Backer; Ian Graham; Marja-Riitta Taskinen; Olov Wiklund; Stefan Agewall; Eduardo Alegria; M John Chapman; Paul Durrington; Serap Erdine; Julian Halcox; Richard Hobbs; John Kjekshus; Pasquale Perrone Filardi; Gabriele Riccardi; Robert F Storey; David Wood Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2011-06-28 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Katrina L Ellis; Jing Pang; Dick C Chan; Amanda J Hooper; Damon A Bell; John R Burnett; Gerald F Watts Journal: J Clin Lipidol Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 4.766
Authors: Paul M Ridker; James Revkin; Pierre Amarenco; Robert Brunell; Madelyn Curto; Fernando Civeira; Marcus Flather; Robert J Glynn; Jean Gregoire; J Wouter Jukema; Yuri Karpov; John J P Kastelein; Wolfgang Koenig; Alberto Lorenzatti; Pravin Manga; Urszula Masiukiewicz; Michael Miller; Arend Mosterd; Jan Murin; Jose C Nicolau; Steven Nissen; Piotr Ponikowski; Raul D Santos; Pamela F Schwartz; Handrean Soran; Harvey White; R Scott Wright; Michal Vrablik; Carla Yunis; Charles L Shear; Jean-Claude Tardif Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jennifer G Robinson; Michel Farnier; Michel Krempf; Jean Bergeron; Gérald Luc; Maurizio Averna; Erik S Stroes; Gisle Langslet; Frederick J Raal; Mahfouz El Shahawy; Michael J Koren; Norman E Lepor; Christelle Lorenzato; Robert Pordy; Umesh Chaudhari; John J P Kastelein Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-03-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sarah D de Ferranti; Angie Mae Rodday; Michael M Mendelson; John B Wong; Laurel K Leslie; R Christopher Sheldrick Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J J Genest; S S Martin-Munley; J R McNamara; J M Ordovas; J Jenner; R H Myers; S R Silberman; P W Wilson; D N Salem; E J Schaefer Journal: Circulation Date: 1992-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Anselm K Gitt; Ulrich Laufs; Winfried März; W Dieter Paar; Peter Bramlage; Nikolaus Marx; Klaus G Parhofer Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 4.964