Literature DB >> 28303900

Associations Between Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Inhibitory Control and Amphetamine Reward Sensitivity.

Jessica Weafer1, Stephanie M Gorka2, Donald Hedeker3, Mario Dzemidzic4,5, David A Kareken4,5,6,7, K Luan Phan2,8,9,10, Harriet de Wit1.   

Abstract

Poor inhibitory control and sensitivity to drug reward are two significant risk factors for drug abuse. Although the two have been largely viewed as separate and independent risk factors, there is new evidence to suggest that they may be related at both the behavioral and neural level. This study examined associations between behavioral and neural correlates of inhibitory control and sensitivity to the subjective rewarding effects of amphetamine in humans. Healthy volunteers (n=63) first completed the stop signal task, a behavioral measure of inhibitory control. Then they participated in four sessions in which they received amphetamine (20 mg) and placebo in alternating order, providing self-report measures of euphoria and arousal at regular intervals. Finally, a subset of participants (n=38) underwent an fMRI scan to assess neural correlates of inhibitory control. In the first phase of the study, participants with longer stop signal reaction time (SSRT) reported greater amphetamine-induced euphoria and stimulation than those with shorter SSRT. In the second phase, fMRI of response inhibition showed the expected activation in right prefrontal regions. Further, individuals who exhibited less activation in the right middle frontal gyrus during the inhibition task reported more euphoria during the amphetamine sessions. This study is the first to show associations between poor inhibitory control and amphetamine reward sensitivity at both behavioral and neural levels in humans. These findings extend our understanding of risk for drug abuse in individuals with poor inhibitory control and suggest novel targets for prevention efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28303900      PMCID: PMC5520786          DOI: 10.1038/npp.2017.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  48 in total

1.  Striatal dopamine D₂/D₃ receptors mediate response inhibition and related activity in frontostriatal neural circuitry in humans.

Authors:  Dara G Ghahremani; Buyean Lee; Chelsea L Robertson; Golnaz Tabibnia; Andrew T Morgan; Natalie De Shetler; Amira K Brown; John R Monterosso; Adam R Aron; Mark A Mandelkern; Russell A Poldrack; Edythe D London
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Striatal D1- and D2-type dopamine receptors are linked to motor response inhibition in human subjects.

Authors:  Chelsea L Robertson; Kenji Ishibashi; Mark A Mandelkern; Amira K Brown; Dara G Ghahremani; Fred Sabb; Robert Bilder; Tyrone Cannon; Jacqueline Borg; Edythe D London
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Common and unique components of inhibition and working memory: an fMRI, within-subjects investigation.

Authors:  Fiona McNab; Gaëlle Leroux; Fredrik Strand; Lisa Thorell; Sissela Bergman; Torkel Klingberg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Training-induced changes in inhibitory control network activity.

Authors:  Elliot T Berkman; Lauren E Kahn; Junaid S Merchant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Acquisition of responses to a methamphetamine-associated cue in healthy humans: self-report, behavioral, and psychophysiological measures.

Authors:  Leah M Mayo; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  High impulsivity predicts the switch to compulsive cocaine-taking.

Authors:  David Belin; Adam C Mar; Jeffrey W Dalley; Trevor W Robbins; Barry J Everitt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Alcohol-Preferring P Rats Exhibit Elevated Motor Impulsivity Concomitant with Operant Responding and Self-Administration of Alcohol.

Authors:  Steven Wesley Beckwith; Cristine Lynn Czachowski
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Neuroimaging Risk Markers for Substance Abuse: Recent Findings on Inhibitory Control and Reward System Functioning.

Authors:  Mary M Heitzeg; Lora M Cope; Meghan E Martz; Jillian E Hardee
Journal:  Curr Addict Rep       Date:  2015-06

9.  Family history of alcoholism interacts with alcohol to affect brain regions involved in behavioral inhibition.

Authors:  David A Kareken; Mario Dzemidzic; Leah Wetherill; William Eiler; Brandon G Oberlin; Jaroslaw Harezlak; Yang Wang; Sean J O'Connor
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Nucleus accumbens D2/3 receptors predict trait impulsivity and cocaine reinforcement.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Dalley; Tim D Fryer; Laurent Brichard; Emma S J Robinson; David E H Theobald; Kristjan Lääne; Yolanda Peña; Emily R Murphy; Yasmene Shah; Katrin Probst; Irina Abakumova; Franklin I Aigbirhio; Hugh K Richards; Young Hong; Jean-Claude Baron; Barry J Everitt; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  15 in total

1.  Pairing neutral cues with alcohol intoxication: new findings in executive and attention networks.

Authors:  Brandon G Oberlin; Mario Dzemidzic; William J A Eiler; Claire R Carron; Christina M Soeurt; Martin H Plawecki; Nicholas J Grahame; Sean J O'Connor; David A Kareken
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Neural correlates of inhibition and reward are negatively associated.

Authors:  Jessica Weafer; Natania A Crane; Stephanie M Gorka; K Luan Phan; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Striatal activity correlates with stimulant-like effects of alcohol in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Jessica Weafer; Thomas J Ross; Sean O'Connor; Elliot A Stein; Harriet de Wit; Emma Childs
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Executive function moderates naltrexone effects on methamphetamine-induced craving and subjective responses.

Authors:  Aaron C Lim; Erica N Grodin; Rejoyce Green; Alexandra Venegas; Lindsay R Meredith; Kelly E Courtney; Nathasha R Moallem; Philip Sayegh; Edythe D London; Lara A Ray
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.829

5.  Methamphetamine acutely alters frontostriatal resting state functional connectivity in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Jessica Weafer; Kathryne Van Hedger; Sarah K Keedy; Nkemdilim Nwaokolo; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.280

6.  Effects of Amphetamine on Sensorimotor Gating and Neurocognition in Antipsychotic-Medicated Schizophrenia Patients.

Authors:  Neal R Swerdlow; Savita G Bhakta; Jo A Talledo; Daniel M Franz; Erica L Hughes; Brinda K Rana; Gregory A Light
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Neural activation to monetary reward is associated with amphetamine reward sensitivity.

Authors:  Natania A Crane; Stephanie M Gorka; Jessica Weafer; Scott A Langenecker; Harriet de Wit; K Luan Phan
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Poor inhibitory control is associated with greater stimulation and less sedation following alcohol.

Authors:  Jessica Weafer; K Luan Phan; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Anticipation of monetary reward in amygdala, insula, caudate are predictors of pleasure sensitivity to d-Amphetamine administration.

Authors:  Scott A Langenecker; Leah R Kling; Natania A Crane; Stephanie M Gorka; Robin Nusslock; Katherine S F Damme; Jessica Weafer; Harriet de Wit; K Luan Phan
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Sweet taste liking is associated with subjective response to amphetamine in women but not men.

Authors:  Jessica Weafer; Nicholas Lyon; Donald Hedeker; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.