Literature DB >> 28303677

Examination of CRISPR/Cas9 design tools and the effect of target site accessibility on Cas9 activity.

Ciaran M Lee1, Timothy H Davis1, Gang Bao1.   

Abstract

NEW
FINDINGS: What is the topic of this review? In this review, we analyse the performance of recently described tools for CRISPR/Cas9 guide RNA design, in particular, design tools that predict CRISPR/Cas9 activity. What advances does it highlight? Recently, many tools designed to predict CRISPR/Cas9 activity have been reported. However, the majority of these tools lack experimental validation. Our analyses indicate that these tools have poor predictive power. Our preliminary results suggest that target site accessibility should be considered in order to develop better guide RNA design tools with improved predictive power. The recent adaptation of the clustered regulatory interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) system for targeted genome engineering has led to its widespread application in many fields worldwide. In order to gain a better understanding of the design rules of CRISPR/Cas9 systems, several groups have carried out large library-based screens leading to some insight into sequence preferences among highly active target sites. To facilitate CRISPR/Cas9 design, these studies have spawned a plethora of guide RNA (gRNA) design tools with algorithms based solely on direct or indirect sequence features. Here, we demonstrate that the predictive power of these tools is poor, suggesting that sequence features alone cannot accurately inform the cutting efficiency of a particular CRISPR/Cas9 gRNA design. Furthermore, we demonstrate that DNA target site accessibility influences the activity of CRISPR/Cas9. With further optimization, we hypothesize that it will be possible to increase the predictive power of gRNA design tools by including both sequence and target site accessibility metrics.
© 2017 The Authors. Experimental Physiology © 2017 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR; Gene Targeting; molecular biology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28303677      PMCID: PMC7266697          DOI: 10.1113/EP086043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Physiol        ISSN: 0958-0670            Impact factor:   2.969


  25 in total

1.  Nucleosomes Inhibit Cas9 Endonuclease Activity in Vitro.

Authors:  John M Hinz; Marian F Laughery; John J Wyrick
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Rodolphe Barrangou; Christophe Fremaux; Hélène Deveau; Melissa Richards; Patrick Boyaval; Sylvain Moineau; Dennis A Romero; Philippe Horvath
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Design and Validation of CRISPR/Cas9 Systems for Targeted Gene Modification in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Ciaran M Lee; Haibao Zhu; Timothy H Davis; Harshahardhan Deshmukh; Gang Bao
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

4.  Highly efficient endogenous human gene correction using designed zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Fyodor D Urnov; Jeffrey C Miller; Ya-Li Lee; Christian M Beausejour; Jeremy M Rock; Sheldon Augustus; Andrew C Jamieson; Matthew H Porteus; Philip D Gregory; Michael C Holmes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems.

Authors:  Le Cong; F Ann Ran; David Cox; Shuailiang Lin; Robert Barretto; Naomi Habib; Patrick D Hsu; Xuebing Wu; Wenyan Jiang; Luciano A Marraffini; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9.

Authors:  Prashant Mali; Luhan Yang; Kevin M Esvelt; John Aach; Marc Guell; James E DiCarlo; Julie E Norville; George M Church
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A novel TALE nuclease scaffold enables high genome editing activity in combination with low toxicity.

Authors:  Claudio Mussolino; Robert Morbitzer; Fabienne Lütge; Nadine Dannemann; Thomas Lahaye; Toni Cathomen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Nucleosomes impede Cas9 access to DNA in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  Max A Horlbeck; Lea B Witkowsky; Benjamin Guglielmi; Joseph M Replogle; Luke A Gilbert; Jacqueline E Villalta; Sharon E Torigoe; Robert Tjian; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 9.  Mechanisms and functions of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzymes.

Authors:  Geeta J Narlikar; Ramasubramanian Sundaramoorthy; Tom Owen-Hughes
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Nucleosome breathing and remodeling constrain CRISPR-Cas9 function.

Authors:  R Stefan Isaac; Fuguo Jiang; Jennifer A Doudna; Wendell A Lim; Geeta J Narlikar; Ricardo Almeida
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  7 in total

1.  Deep learning improves prediction of CRISPR-Cpf1 guide RNA activity.

Authors:  Hui Kwon Kim; Seonwoo Min; Myungjae Song; Soobin Jung; Jae Woo Choi; Younggwang Kim; Sangeun Lee; Sungroh Yoon; Hyongbum Henry Kim
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  A CRISPR/dCas9 toolkit for functional analysis of maize genes.

Authors:  Irene N Gentzel; Chan Ho Park; Maria Bellizzi; Guiqing Xiao; Kiran R Gadhave; Colin Murphree; Qin Yang; Jonathan LaMantia; Margaret G Redinbaugh; Peter Balint-Kurti; Tim L Sit; Guo-Liang Wang
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 4.993

3.  Efficient Genome Engineering of a Virulent Klebsiella Bacteriophage Using CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Juntao Shen; Jinjie Zhou; Guo-Qiang Chen; Zhi-Long Xiu
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Prediction of off-target activities for the end-to-end design of CRISPR guide RNAs.

Authors:  Jennifer Listgarten; Michael Weinstein; Benjamin P Kleinstiver; Alexander A Sousa; J Keith Joung; Jake Crawford; Kevin Gao; Luong Hoang; Melih Elibol; John G Doench; Nicolo Fusi
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 25.671

5.  Chromatin accessibility is associated with CRISPR-Cas9 efficiency in the zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Authors:  Meri I E Uusi-Mäkelä; Harlan R Barker; Carina A Bäuerlein; Tomi Häkkinen; Matti Nykter; Mika Rämet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Computational Tools and Resources Supporting CRISPR-Cas Experiments.

Authors:  Pawel Sledzinski; Mateusz Nowaczyk; Marta Olejniczak
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 7.  Advances in the Development of Phage-Based Probes for Detection of Bio-Species.

Authors:  Kameshpandian Paramasivam; Yuanzhao Shen; Jiasheng Yuan; Ibtesam Waheed; Chuanbin Mao; Xin Zhou
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.