Literature DB >> 28303288

[Technical advancements in cochlear implants : State of the art].

A Büchner1, L Gärtner2.   

Abstract

Twenty years ago, cochlear implants (CI) were indicated only in cases of profound hearing loss or complete deafness. While from today's perspective the technology was clumsy and provided patients with only limited speech comprehension in quiet scenarios, successive advances in CI technology and the consequent substantial hearing improvements over time have since then resulted in continuous relaxation of indication criteria toward residual hearing. While achievements in implant and processor electronics have been one key factor for the ever-improving hearing performance, development of electro-acoustic CI systems-together with atraumatic implantation concepts-has led to enormous improvements in patients with low-frequency residual hearing. Manufactures have designed special processors with integrated hearing aid components for this patient group, which are capable of conveying acoustic and electric stimulation. A further milestone in improvement of hearing in challenging listening environments was the adoption of signal enhancement algorithms and assistive listening devices from the hearing aid industry. This article gives an overview of the current state of the art in the abovementioned areas of CI technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic stimulation; Electric stimulation; Hearing aids; Hearing loss; Implants

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28303288     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-017-0339-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  27 in total

1.  The Advanced Bionics High Resolution Mode: stimulation rates up to 5000 pps.

Authors:  Andreas Buechner; Carolin Frohne-Büchner; Lutz Gaertner; Timo Stoever; Rolf D Battmer; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J T Rubinstein; B S Wilson; C C Finley; P J Abbas
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Optogenetic stimulation of the auditory pathway.

Authors:  Victor H Hernandez; Anna Gehrt; Kirsten Reuter; Zhizi Jing; Marcus Jeschke; Alejandro Mendoza Schulz; Gerhard Hoch; Matthias Bartels; Gerhard Vogt; Carolyn W Garnham; Hiromu Yawo; Yugo Fukazawa; George J Augustine; Ernst Bamberg; Sebastian Kügler; Tim Salditt; Livia de Hoz; Nicola Strenzke; Tobias Moser
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Temporal bone results and hearing preservation with a new straight electrode.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Timo Stover; Andreas Buechner; Gerrit Paasche; Robert Briggs; Frank Risi; Joerg Pesch; Rolf-Dieter Battmer
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects.

Authors:  B Townshend; N Cotter; D Van Compernolle; R L White
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Results of a pilot study with a signal enhancement algorithm for HiRes 120 cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Andreas Buechner; Martina Brendel; Hilke Saalfeld; Leonid Litvak; Carolin Frohne-Buechner; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Advanced beamformers for cochlear implant users: acute measurement of speech perception in challenging listening conditions.

Authors:  Andreas Buechner; Karl-Heinz Dyballa; Phillipp Hehrmann; Stefan Fredelake; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Residual Hearing Preservation with the Evo® Cochlear Implant Electrode Array: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Fabiana Danieli; Ana Tereza de Matos Magalhães; Dan Gnansia; Michel Hoen
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-16

10.  Clinical evaluation of the Nucleus 6 cochlear implant system: performance improvements with SmartSound iQ.

Authors:  Stefan J Mauger; Chris D Warren; Michelle R Knight; Michael Goorevich; Esti Nel
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Postoperative legal disputes involving patients with cochlear implants].

Authors:  A Lottner; H Iro; A Schützenberger; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Research Status and Future Development of Cochlear Reimplantation.

Authors:  Xinyi Yao; Haotian Liu; Jinyuan Si; Xiuyong Ding; Yu Zhao; Yun Zheng
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 3.  Cochlear Implantation in Hearing-Impaired Elderly: Clinical Challenges and Opportunities to Optimize Outcome.

Authors:  Angelika Illg; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 5.152

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.