Literature DB >> 19479460

The Advanced Bionics High Resolution Mode: stimulation rates up to 5000 pps.

Andreas Buechner1, Carolin Frohne-Büchner, Lutz Gaertner, Timo Stoever, Rolf D Battmer, Thomas Lenarz.   

Abstract

CONCLUSION: The technology of stimulation rates between 1500 and 5000 pulses per second per channel (pps/ch) brings a benefit for all users. However, the fastest possible rate does not necessarily lead to best hearing performance in each individual subject. Individual optimization of stimulation rate is recommended.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of high stimulation rates on speech perception ability. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirteen subjects with at least 3 months of experience with conventional Clarion speech coding strategies were recruited into cross-over studies. The first study investigated stimulation rates of 1500, 2000 and 3000 pps/ch, the second study investigated rates of 2500 and 5000 pps/ch. Speech perception data were collected for testing in quiet and in competing noise.
RESULTS: On average, speech perception performance increased significantly when changing from conventional speech coding strategies to High Resolution Mode. Subjects who preferred continous interleaved sampling (CIS) in standard mode appeared to obtain better results with rates of 2500 or 3000 pps/ch than with 5000 pps/ch. The stimulation rate that led to best performance provided the highest stimulation current efficiency in the majority of subjects.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19479460     DOI: 10.3109/00016480902971239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  4 in total

1.  Effect of Stimulation Rate on Speech Understanding in Older Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Maureen J Shader; Nicole Nguyen; Miranda Cleary; Ronna Hertzano; David J Eisenman; Samira Anderson; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  [Technical advancements in cochlear implants : State of the art].

Authors:  A Büchner; L Gärtner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Influence of signal processing strategy in auditory abilities.

Authors:  Tatiana Mendes de Melo; Maria Cecília Bevilacqua; Orozimbo Alves Costa; Adriane Lima Mortari Moret
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.