Literature DB >> 28301701

Enrolling in Clinical Research While Incarcerated: What Influences Participants' Decisions?

Paul P Christopher, Lorena G Garcia-Sampson, Michael Stein, Jennifer Johnson, Josiah Rich, Charles Lidz.   

Abstract

As a 2006 Institute of Medicine report highlights, surprisingly little empirical attention has been paid to how prisoners arrive at decisions to participate in modern research. With our study, we aimed to fill this gap by identifying a more comprehensive range of factors as reported by prisoners themselves during semistructured interviews. Our participants described a diverse range of motives, both favoring and opposing their eventual decision to join. Many are well-recognized considerations among nonincarcerated clinical research participants, including a desire for various forms of personal benefit, altruism, and concern about study risks and inconveniences. However, a number of influences seem unique to prisoners. Participants did not report that they were not coerced into enrolling, and they have even been under pressure not to enroll. However, many sought to enroll in order to obtain access to better health care, raising a concern about whether they were unfairly exploited.
© 2017 The Hastings Center.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28301701      PMCID: PMC5356487          DOI: 10.1002/hast.686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep        ISSN: 0093-0334            Impact factor:   2.683


  10 in total

1.  Measuring coercion to participate in research within a doubly vulnerable population: initial development of the coercion assessment scale.

Authors:  Karen Leggett Dugosh; David S Festinger; Jason R Croft; Douglas B Marlowe
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Human subjects research with prisoners: putting the ethical question in context.

Authors:  Osagie K Obasogie; Keramet A Reiter
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  The health and health care of US prisoners: results of a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Andrew P Wilper; Steffie Woolhandler; J Wesley Boyd; Karen E Lasser; Danny McCormick; David H Bor; David U Himmelstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Compensation for incarcerated research participants: diverse state policies suggest a new research agenda.

Authors:  Amy B Smoyer; Kim M Blankenship; Brandis Belt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?

Authors:  A Wertheimer; F G Miller
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Voluntary consent in correctional settings: do offenders feel coerced to participate in research?

Authors:  John F Edens; Monica Epstein; Paul G Stiles; Norman G Poythress
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec

7.  Exploitation of Prisoners in Clinical Research: Perceptions of Study Participants.

Authors:  Paul P Christopher; Michael D Stein; Jennifer E Johnson; Josiah D Rich; Peter D Friedmann; Jennifer Clarke; Charles W Lidz
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

8.  Key Stakeholders' Perceptions of Motivators for Research Participation Among Individuals Who Are Incarcerated.

Authors:  Bridget L Hanson; Sherilyn A Faulkner; Christiane Brems; Staci L Corey; Gloria D Eldridge; Mark E Johnson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Coercion and informed consent in research involving prisoners.

Authors:  David J Moser; Stephan Arndt; Jason E Kanz; Michelle L Benjamin; John D Bayless; Rebecca L Reese; Jane S Paulsen; Michael A Flaum
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.735

10.  Patient motivations surrounding participation in phase I and phase II clinical trials of cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Z A Nurgat; W Craig; N C Campbell; J D Bissett; J Cassidy; M C Nicolson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  "Teach-to-Goal" to Better Assess Informed Consent Comprehension among Incarcerated Clinical Research Participants.

Authors:  Cyrus Ahalt; Rebecca Sudore; Marielle Bolano; Lia Metzger; Anna M Darby; Brie Williams
Journal:  AMA J Ethics       Date:  2017-09-01

2.  A Correctional-Public Health Collaboration for Colorectal Cancer Screening in a State Prison System.

Authors:  Dora M Dumont; Deborah Davis; Radha Sadacharan; Eric Lamy; Jennifer G Clarke
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Do prisoners trust the healthcare system?

Authors:  Lindsey A Vandergrift; Paul P Christopher
Journal:  Health Justice       Date:  2021-07-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.